DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Algorithm-Based Simulation Scenario for Emergency Measures with High-Risk Newborns Presenting with Apnea

고위험 신생아 무호흡 응급관리 시뮬레이션 시나리오 평가

  • Shin, Hyunsook (College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Yu-nah (College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Rim, Da Hae (College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University)
  • 신현숙 (경희대학교 간호과학대학) ;
  • 이유나 (경희대학교 간호과학대학) ;
  • 임다해 (경희대학교 간호과학대학)
  • Received : 2014.12.18
  • Accepted : 2015.04.18
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to develop and evaluate an algorithm-based simulation scenario for emergency measures for high-risk newborns presenting with apnea. Methods: A one shot case study design was used to evaluate the algorithm-based simulation scenario. Effects of the developed simulation scenario were evaluated using the Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET) and the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric (LCJR). From March to November 137 senior nursing students completed the simulation using this scenario. Results: The eight-frame simulation scenario was developed based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) and the nursing clinical judgment process. After use of the scenario, overall scores for SET and LCJR were 21.0 out of 26.0 and 32.4 out of 44.0 respectively. There were no significant differences in scores according to general characteristics. Positive correlation coefficients were identified among overall and subcategories of SET and LCJR. In addition, students provided positive feedback on the simulation experience. Conclusion: Considering that nursing students have limited access to high-risk newborns during their clinical experience and that newborns presenting apnea are common in the neonatal intensive care unit, the simulation scenario developed in this study is expected to provide nursing students with more opportunities to practice emergency measures for high-risk newborns.

Keywords

References

  1. Allan, C. K., Thiagarajan, R. R., Beke, D., Imprescia, A., Kappus, L. J., Garden, A., et al. (2010). Simulation-based training delivered directly to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit engenders preparedness, comfort, and decreased anxiety among multidisciplinary resuscitation teams. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 140(3), 646-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.04.027
  2. Anderson, J. M., & Warren, J. B. (2011). Using simulation to enhance the acquisition and retention of clinical skills in neonatology. Seminars in Perinatology, 35(2), 59-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2011.01.004
  3. Andersen, P. O., Jensen, M. K., Lipper, A., & Ostergaard, D. (2010). Identifying non-technical skills and barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams. Resuscitation, 81(6), 695-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.024
  4. Askin, D. F. (2002). Complications in the transition from fetal to neonatal life. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 31(3), 318-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00054
  5. Butler, K. W., Veltre, D. E., & Brady, D. (2009). Implementation of active learning pedagogy comparing low-fidelity simulation versus high-fidelity simulation in pediatric nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(4), 129-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.03.118
  6. Elfrink Cordi, V. L., Leighton, K., Ryan-Wenger, N., Doyle, T. J., & Ravert, P. (2012). History and development of the simulation effectiveness tool (SET). Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(6), 199-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.12.001
  7. Harris, M. A. (2011). Simulation-enhanced pediatric clinical orientation. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(8), 461-465. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3928/01484834-20110429-05
  8. Kassab, M., & Kenner, C. (2011). Simulation and neonatal nursing education. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 11(1), 8-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.nainr.2010.12.006
  9. Kattwinkel, J., Perlman, J. M., Aziz, K., Colby, C., Fairchild, K., Gallagher, J., et al. (2010). Part 15: Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation, 122(18 Suppl 3), S909-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971119
  10. Lasater, K. (2007). High-fidelity simulation and the development of clinical judgment: Students' experiences. The Journal of Nursing Education, 46(6), 269.
  11. Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simualtion to create an assessment rubric. The Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 496-503.
  12. Lee, S. O., Um, M., & Lee, J. H. (2007). Use of simulation in nursing education. The Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Education, 13(1), 90-94.
  13. Lindamood, K. E., & Weinstock, P. (2011). Application of high-fidelity simulation training to the neonatal resuscitation and pediatric advanced life support programs. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 11(1), 23-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.nainr.2010.12.010
  14. Parker, R. A., McNeill, J. A., Pelayo, L. W., Goei, K. A., & Gunter, M. D. (2011). Pediatric clinical simulation: A pilot project. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(2), 105-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20101230-05
  15. Patel, M. R., Jneid, H., Derdeyn, C. P., Klein, L. W., Levine, G. N., Lookstein, R. A., et al. (2010). Arteriotomy closure devices for cardiovascular procedures: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 122(18), 1882-1893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181f9b345
  16. Shin, H., & Kim, M. J. (2014). Evaluation of an integrated simulation courseware in a pediatric nursing practicum. The Journal of Nursing Education, 53(10), 589-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140922-05
  17. Shin, H., Shim, K., & Lee, Y. (2013). Nursing activities identified through pediatric nursing simulation. Child Health Nursing Research, 19(2), 111-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2013.19.2.111.
  18. Tanner, C. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. The Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 204-211.

Cited by

  1. 고충실도 시뮬레이터를 활용한 모성간호 시뮬레이션 교육의 효과 vol.17, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2016.17.3.177
  2. 간호시뮬레이션에서 나타나는 임상판단과정 분석 vol.19, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2018.19.9.130
  3. 천식 아동 간호에 대한 가상현실 시뮬레이션과 블렌디드 시뮬레이션 교육 효과 vol.25, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2019.25.4.496
  4. 신생아집중치료실 간호사를 위한 시뮬레이션 기반 응급기도 관리 교육 프로그램 개발 및 효과 vol.25, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2019.25.4.518
  5. Development and Evaluation of a Home-visit Simulation Scenario for Elderly People with Diabetes Mellitus Who Live Alone vol.37, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2020.1736399
  6. 고위험신생아 간호교육에서의 다큐멘터리 활용에 대한 탐색적 연구 vol.26, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2020.26.2.173
  7. Development and Evaluation of an Algorithm-Corresponding Instrument for Nursing Simulation vol.59, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20201020-04
  8. Effectiveness of Debriefing for Meaningful Learning-based simulation training on high-risk neonatal care: A randomized controlled simulation study vol.61, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.024