DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bone and Soft Tissue Changes after Two-Jaw Surgery in Cleft Patients

  • Yun, Yung Sang (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Uhm, Ki Il (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jee Nam (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Dong Hyeok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Hyun Gon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Soon Heum (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Cheol Keun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jo, Dong In (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2014.12.26
  • Accepted : 2015.04.22
  • Published : 2015.07.15

Abstract

Background Orthognathic surgery is required in 25% to 35% of patients with a cleft lip and palate, for whom functional recovery and aesthetic improvement after surgery are important. The aim of this study was to examine maxillary and mandibular changes, along with concomitant soft tissue changes, in cleft patients who underwent LeFort I osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (two-jaw surgery). Methods Twenty-eight cleft patients who underwent two-jaw surgery between August 2008 and November 2013 were included. Cephalometric analysis was conducted before and after surgery. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of the bone and soft tissue were compared. Results The mean horizontal advancement of the maxilla (point A) was 6.12 mm, while that of the mandible (point B) was -5.19 mm. The mean point A-nasion-point B angle was $-4.1^{\circ}$ before surgery, and increased to $2.5^{\circ}$ after surgery. The mean nasolabial angle was $72.7^{\circ}$ before surgery, and increased to $88.7^{\circ}$ after surgery. The mean minimal distance between Rickett's E-line and the upper lip was 6.52 mm before surgery and 1.81 mm after surgery. The ratio of soft tissue change to bone change was 0.55 between point A and point A' and 0.93 between point B and point B'. Conclusions Patients with cleft lip and palate who underwent two-jaw surgery showed optimal soft tissue changes. The position of the soft tissue (point A') was shifted by a distance equal to 55% of the change in the maxillary bone. Therefore, bone surgery without soft tissue correction can achieve good aesthetic results.

Keywords

References

  1. DeLuke DM, Marchand A, Robles EC, et al. Facial growth and the need for orthognathic surgery after cleft palate repair: literature review and report of 28 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:694-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90579-6
  2. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:5-77.
  3. Chang IH, Lee YJ, Park YG. A comparative study of soft tissue changes with mandibular one jaw surgery and double jaw surgery in Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 2006; 36:63-73.
  4. Sumi Y, Hata KI, Sawaki Y, et al. Clinical application of cultured oral epithelium for palatal wounds after palatoplasty: a preliminary report. Oral Dis 1999;5:307-12.
  5. Dua G, Navin Kumar A, Roy ID, et al. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate cases with midface hypoplasia using rigid external distractor: an alternative technique. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:746-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000735
  6. Lee TS, Kim HY, Kim TH, et al. Contouring of the lower face by a novel method of narrowing and lengthening genioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:274e-282e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438054.21634.4a

Cited by

  1. Large-Scale Study of Long-Term Anteroposterior Stability in a Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach Without Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment vol.28, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003853
  2. Can a surgery-first orthognathic approach reduce the total treatment time? vol.46, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.006
  3. Change in Posterior Pharyngeal Space After Counterclockwise Rotational Orthognathic Surgery for Class II Dentofacial Deformity Diagnosed With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Cephalometric Analysis vol.28, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003761
  4. Airway Changes after Cleft Orthognathic Surgery Evaluated by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography and Overnight Polysomnographic Study vol.7, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12251-4
  5. Cleft-Related Orthognathic Surgery Based on Maxillary Vertical Lengthening of the Anterior Facial Height vol.141, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004172
  6. Relapse after Le Fort I surgery in oral cleft patients: a 2-year follow-up using digitized and 3D models vol.106, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0351-8
  7. Ampliação e validação do protocolo de avaliação miofuncional orofacial para indivíduos com fissura labiopalatina vol.31, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182018109
  8. Skeletal, dental and facial aesthetic changes following anterior maxillary segmental distraction by tooth-borne device in patients with cleft lip and palate vol.50, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.09.010