The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences (한국통신학회논문지)

The Korean Institute of Commucations and Information Sciences (한국통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Throughput Performance Evaluation According to The State Change of A Primary Ship in Maritime Cognitive Radio Networks

해상 인지 무선 네트워크에서 선순위 선박의 상태 변화를 고려한 수율 성능 평가

  • Received : 2015.03.20
  • Accepted : 2015.05.28
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The maritime cognitive radio networks (MCRNs) provide the high throughput with a low communication cost because the secondary ships opportunistically access to unused licensed bands of primary ships. In the ground cognitive radio networks, the busy and idle state of a primary user during a frame is not nearly changed because the state of the primary user are slowly changed. However, the state of the primary ship in the MCRNs may be frequently changed in the frame. Therefore, this paper evaluates the throughput of a primary ship and secondary ships in the MCRNs taking the state change of a primary ship into consideration when the fusion center uses the cooperative spectrum sensing. The simulation results show that trade-off between the throughput of a primary ship and that of secondary ships according to the system parameter such as the cooperative spectrum sensing scheme, the number of secondary ships, and the target detection probability.

해상 인지 무선 네트워크에서는 선순위 선박이 미사용 중인 스펙트럼 자원을 차순위 선박이 기회주의적으로 사용함으로써 낮은 통신비용으로 높은 수율을 제공할 수 있다. 기존 육상 인지 무선 네트워크에서는 선순위 사용자의 사용과 유휴간의 동작상태 변화가 드물게 발생하므로 선순위 사용자의 동작상태가 차순위 사용자의 한 프레임 시간 내에서 변하지 않는다. 하지만 해상 인지 무선 네트워크에서는 육상 인지 무선 네트워크와 달리 선순위 선박의 동작상태 변화가 빈번히 발생하므로 차순위 선박의 한 프레임 시간 내에서 선순위 선박의 상태가 변할 수 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 해상 인지 무선 네트워크에서 선순위 선박의 동작상태 변화를 고려한 시스템 레벨 시뮬레이션을 통해서 협력적 스펙트럼 센싱을 사용하는 해상 인지 무선 네트워크에서 선순위 선박과 차순위 선박의 수율 성능을 분석한다. 선순위 선박과 차순위 선박의 수율 분석을 통해서 선순위 선박과 차순위 선박의 수율이 파라미터 변화에 따라 서로 상호 배타적인 관계를 가지는 것을 확인할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. ITU-R M.1371-5, Technical characteristics for an automatic identification system using time division multiple access in the VHF maritime mobile frequency band, Feb. 2014.
  2. E. Waleed, H. Najam, A. A. Muhammad, and K. H. Seok, "Cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks application: performance analysis for realistic channel conditions," Advances in Comput. Sci., Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 225, pp. 197-206, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00951-3_20
  3. Z. Ming-Tuo, "Cognitive maritime wireless mesh/ad hoc networks," J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 518-526, Mar. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2010.12.018
  4. H. Urkowitz, "Energy detection of unknown deterministic signals," in Proc. IEEE, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1379-1380, Aug. 1968.
  5. F. Digham, M. Alouini, and M. Simon, "On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 21-24, Jan. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2006.887483
  6. P. Sutton, K. Nolan, and L. Doyle, "Cyclostationary signatures in practical cognitive radio applications," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 13-24, Jan. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2008.080103
  7. S. V. Nagaraj, "Entropy based spectrum sensing in cognitive radio," Signal Process., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 174-180, Feb. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.07.022
  8. Y. Nam, Y. Lee, S. R. Lee, M. Jeong, and J. So, "Performance evaluation of cooperative spectrum sensing in maritime cognitive radio networks," J. KICS, vol. 39C, no. 11, pp. 1192-1200, Nov. 2014. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2014.39C.11.1192
  9. M. Lim, K. Kim, Y. Lee, and S. R. Lee, "Dynamic spectrum allocation algorithm for maritime communications using spectrum sharing and priority," J. KICS, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1001-1008, Jul. 2010.
  10. K. S. Kim, M. S. Lim, Y. Lee, K. H. Kim, and S. R. Lee, "Dynamic spectrum allocation algorithm for maritime communications network applying spectrum reuse," J. KICS, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 999-1005, Oct. 2010.
  11. B. Rassouli and A. Olfat, "Periodic spectrum sensing parameters optimization in cognitive radio networks," IET Commun., vol. 6, no. 18, pp. 3329-3338, Dec. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2012.0113
  12. W. Y. Lee and I. F. Akyildiz, "Optimal spectrum sensing framework for cognitive radio networks," IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 3845-3857, Oct. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-WC.2008.070391
  13. K. Chang and B. Senadji, "Spectrum sensing optimization for dynamic primary user signal," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 3632-3640, Dec. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2012.091712.110856
  14. E. Pei, B. Shen, F. Cheng, and X. Jing, "Optimal sensing time and power allocation in dynamic primary-user traffic model based cognitive radio networks," IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E97-B, no. 1, pp. 196-203, Jan. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.E97.B.196
  15. L. Tang, Y. Chen, E. L. Hines, and M. S. Alouini, "Effect of primary user traffic on sensing-throughput trade off for cognitive radios," IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1063-1068, Apr. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2011.020111.101870
  16. S. Geirhofer, L. Tong, and B. M. Sadler, "Cognitive radios for dynamic spectrum access-dynamic spectrum access in the time domain: modeling and exploiting white space," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 66-72, May 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2007.358851