Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition

The Korean Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (대한소아소화기영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Benefits of a Dedicated Breastfeeding Facility and Support Program for Exclusive Breastfeeding among Workers in Indonesia

  • Basrowi, Ray W (Occupational Medicine Study Program) ;
  • Sulistomo, Astrid B (Division of Occupational Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia) ;
  • Adi, Nuri Purwito (Division of Occupational Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia) ;
  • Vandenplas, Yvan (Department of Pediatrics, Universitair Kinderziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
  • Received : 2015.03.30
  • Accepted : 2015.04.29
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: A mother's working environment is believed to be a major determinant of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) practice. We aimed to define the influence of a facility dedicated to breastfeeding and a breastfeeding support program at the workplace on breastfeeding practice. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in five workplaces. The inclusion criteria were female workers whose last child was between 6 and 36 months old. Observational data were obtained and a questionnaire was filled out. The World Health Organization definition for EBF was used. Results: Data from 186 subjects (74 office workers and 112 factory workers) were collected. Just over half (52%) of the mothers were between 20 and 46 years old, 75.3% had graduated from high school and university, 12.9% had more than two children and 36.0% owned a house. The prevalence of EBF during the last 6 months was 32.3%. A proper dedicated breastfeeding facility was available for 21.5% of the mothers, but only 7.5% had been in contact with a breastfeeding support program. The presence of a dedicated breastfeeding facility increased EBF practice almost threefold, by an odds ratio (OR) of 2.74 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.34-5.64 (p<0.05). Knowledge of the breastfeeding support program increased EBF practice by almost six times (OR, 5.93; 95% CI, 1.78-19.79) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Governments should make it obligatory for employers to offer a breastfeeding support program and a dedicated breastfeeding facility at the workplace as these simple measures significantly increase EBF.

Keywords

References

  1. Teh SC, Chong SI, Tan HH, Ho J. Chinese mothers intention to breastfeed, actual achievement and early postnatal experience. Med J Malaysia 2000;55:347-51.
  2. Chuang CH, Chang PJ, Hsieh WS, Guo YL, Lin SH, Lin SJ, et al. The combined effect of employment status and transcultural marriage on breast feeding: a population- based survey in Taiwan. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:319-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00828.x
  3. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. National basic health research (Riskesdas). Jakarta: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2007.
  4. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 33 year 2012 on exclusive breastfeeding. Jakarta: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2012.
  5. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2002: reducing risks. promoting healthy life. Geneva: WHO, 2002.
  6. Susiloretni KA, Hadi H, Prabandari YS, Soenarto YS, Wilopo SA. What works to improve duration of exclusive breastfeeding: lessons from the exclusive breastfeeding promotion program in rural Indonesia. Matern Child Health J 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
  7. Mekuria G, Edris M. Exclusive breastfeeding and associated factors among mothers in Debre Markos, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J 2015;10:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-014-0027-0
  8. Seid AM, Yesuf ME, Koye DN. Prevalence of Exclusive Breastfeeding Practices and associated factors among mothers in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J 2013;8:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-8-14
  9. Petrova A, Ayers C, Stechna S, Gerling JA, Mehta R. Effectiveness of exclusive breastfeeding promotion in low-income mothers: a randomized controlled study. Breastfeed Med 2009;4:63-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2008.0126
  10. Vitolo MR, Louzada ML, Rauber F. Positive impact of child feeding training program for primary care health professionals: a cluster randomized field trial. Rev Bras Epidemiol 201417:873-86. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4503201400040007
  11. Johnson AM, Kirk R, Muzik M. Overcoming workplace barriers: a focus group study exploring african american mothers' needs for workplace breastfeeding support. J Hum Lact 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
  12. Hojnacki SE, Bolton T, Fulmer IS, Olson BH. Development and piloting of an instrument that measures company support for breastfeeding. J Hum Lact 2012;28:20-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334411430666
  13. Abdulwadud OA, Snow ME. Interventions in the workplace to support breastfeeding for women in employment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012(10):CD006177.
  14. Weber D, Janson A, Nolan M, Wen LM, Rissel C. Female employees' perceptions of organisationalsupport for breastfeeding at work: findings from an Australian health service workplace. Int Breastfeed J 20116:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-6-19
  15. Garvin CC, Sriraman NK, Paulson A, Wallace E, Martin CE, Marshall L. The business case for breastfeeding: a successful regional implementation, evaluation, and follow-up. Breastfeed Med 2013;8:413-7. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2012.0104

Cited by

  1. Employer-Based Programs to Support Breastfeeding Among Working Mothers: A Systematic Review vol.12, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2016.0182
  2. Violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes: Indonesia context vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016001567
  3. Barriers to exclusive breast-feeding in Indonesian hospitals: a qualitative study of early infant feeding practices vol.21, pp.14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980018001453
  4. Challenges and Supports of Breastfeeding at Workplace in Indonesia vol.21, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2018.21.4.248
  5. Positive Effect of Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiatives on Improving Mothers' Intention for Successful Breastfeeding in Korea vol.33, pp.43, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e272
  6. Developing a workplace lactation promotion model in Indonesia using Delphi technique vol.76, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-018-0312-2
  7. Breastfeeding Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among White-Collar and Blue-Collar Workers in Indonesia vol.34, pp.45, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e284
  8. Progress towards reducing sociodemographic disparities in breastfeeding outcomes in Indonesia: a trend analysis from 2002 to 2017 vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09194-3
  9. Breastfeeding Support Rooms and Their Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals: A Qualitative Study vol.9, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.732061
  10. Exclusive breastfeeding among working mothers in Kenya: Perspectives from women, families and employers vol.17, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13194
  11. Breastfeeding at the workplace: a systematic review of interventions to improve workplace environments to facilitate breastfeeding among working women vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01432-3
  12. How do breastfeeding workplace interventions work?: a realist review vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01490-7
  13. The yearly financing need of providing paid maternity leave in the informal sector in Indonesia vol.16, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-021-00363-7