DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental research on seismic behavior of novel composite RCS joints

  • Men, Jinjie (College of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology) ;
  • Guo, Zhifeng (College of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology) ;
  • Shi, Qingxuan (College of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology)
  • Received : 2014.05.21
  • Accepted : 2014.12.30
  • Published : 2015.07.25

Abstract

Results from an experimental study on the seismic response of six composite reinforced concrete column-to-steel beam interior joints are presented. The primary variable investigated is the details in the joint. For the basic specimen, the main subassemblies of the beam and column are both continuous, and the steel beam flanges extended to the joint are partly cut off. Transverse beam, steel band plates, cove plates, X shape reinforcement bars and end plates are used in the other five specimens, respectively. After the joint steel panel yielded, two failure modes were observed during the test: local failure in Specimens 1, 2 and 4, shear failure in Specimens 3, 5 and 6. Specimens 6, 3, 5 and 4 have a better strength and deformation capacity than the other two specimens for the effectiveness of their subassemblies. For Specimens 2 and 4, though the performance of strength degradation and stiffness degradation are not as good as the other four specimens, they all have excellent energy dissipation capacity comparing to the RC joint, or the Steel Reinforced Concrete (SRC) joint. Based on the test result, some suggestions are presented for the design of composite RCS joint.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China

References

  1. ASCE Task Committee on Design Criteria for Composite Structures in Steel and Concrete (1994), "Guidelines for design of joints between steel beams and reinforced concrete columns", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 120(8), 2330-2357. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:8(2330)
  2. Bahman, F.A., Hosein, G. and Nima, T. (2013), "Seismic performance of composite RCS special moment frames", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 17(2), 450-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1431-5
  3. Chen, C.H., Cordova, P., Lai, W.C., Deierlein, G.G. and Tsai, K.C. (2004), "Pseudo-dynamic test of full-scale RCS frame. I: Design, construction and testing", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August.
  4. Chou, C.C. and Wu, C.C. (2007), "Performance evaluation of steel reduced flange plate moment connections", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(14), 2083-2097. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.714
  5. Chou, C.C. and Chen, J.H. (2010), "Tests and analyses of a full-scale post-tensioned RCS frame subassembly", J. Construct. Steel Res., 66(11), 1354-1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.013
  6. Chou, C.C., Wang, C.Y. and Chen, J.H. (2008), "Seismic design and behavior of post-tensioned connections including effects of a composite slab", Eng. Struct., 30, 3014-3023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.013
  7. Cordova, P., Lai, W.C., Chen, C.H. and Tsai, K.C. (2004), "Pseudo-dynamic test of full-scale RCS frame. II: Analyses and design implication", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August.
  8. Deierlein, G.G. and Noguchi, H. (2004), "Overview of U.S.-Japan research on seismic design of composite reinforced concrete and steel moment frame", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 130(2), 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(361)
  9. Fargier-Gabaldon, L.B. and Parra-Montesinos, G.J. (2006), "Behavior of reinforced concrete column-steel beam roof level T-connections under displacement reversals", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 132(7), 1041-1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:7(1041)
  10. Griffis, L.G. (1986), "Some design considerations for composite-frame structures", Eng. J., AISC Second Quarter, 59-64.
  11. Guo, Z.X., Zhu, Q.Y. and Liu, Y. (2012), "Experimental study on seismic behaviors of a new type of prefabricated RCS frame connections", J. Build. Struct., 33(7), 98-105. [In Chinese]
  12. Hiroshi, K. and Isao, N. (2004), "Seismic performance and stress transferring mechanism of throughcolumn-type joints for composite reinforced concrete and steel frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 130(2), 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(352)
  13. Liang, X.M. and Parra-Moniesinos, G.J. (2004), "Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete column-steel beam subassemblies and frame systems", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE 130(2), 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(310)
  14. Michael, N.B., Joseph, M.B. and Walter, P.M.J. (2000), "Seismic behavior of composite RCS frame systems", J. Struct. Eng, ASCE, 126(4), 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(429)
  15. Sheikh, T.M., Deierlein, G.G., Yura, J.A. and Jirsa, J.O. (1989), "Beam-column moment connections for composite frames: Part 1", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 115(11), 2858-2876. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:11(2858)

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Hoek-Brown and Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion for deep open coal mine slope stability vol.60, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.60.5.809
  2. Analytical Investigation of the Flexural Capacity of Precast Concrete Frames with Hybrid Joints vol.2019, pp.1687-8094, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7470128
  3. Studies on restoring force model of concrete filled steel tubular laced column to composite box-beam connections vol.22, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.6.1217
  4. Experimental investigation on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete column-steel beam subassemblies vol.28, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.4.471
  5. Simplified method for modeling reinforced concrete column-steel beam connections with tube plate vol.23, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220906224