DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Correlation between Big 5 Personality Traits and SRQ of Brain Quotient

Big 5 성격특성과 뇌기능 분석지수(BQ)의 자기조절지수 (Self Regulation Quotient)와의 상관관계 연구

  • Im, Giyong (Dept. of Neuroscience Seoul University of Buddhism) ;
  • Park, Hee-Rae (Dept. of Neuroscience Seoul University of Buddhism) ;
  • Choi, Nam-Sook (Dept. of Neuroscience Seoul University of Buddhism) ;
  • Park, Pyong-Woon (Dept. of Neuroscience Seoul University of Buddhism)
  • 임기용 (서울불교대학원대학교 뇌과학 전공) ;
  • 박희래 (서울불교대학원대학교 뇌과학 전공) ;
  • 최남숙 (서울불교대학원대학교 뇌과학 전공) ;
  • 박병운 (서울불교대학원대학교 뇌과학 전공)
  • Received : 2015.03.03
  • Accepted : 2015.06.11
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

This study was to examine the correlation of Personality and EEG. Personality test and EEG of the 40 team leader of a business enterprise were carried out at the same time and the correlation of test results were analyzed. Personality test was done by Big 5 and brain waves were measured by 2-Channel EEG System at Fp1 and Fp2. The analysis showed a positive correlation between the Big 5 agreeableness and SRQ(Self Regulation Quotient) relaxation status which is related with alpha rhythm, and showed a negative correlation between the Big 5 openness and SRQ concentration status which is related with low_beta rhythm. It means that the personality is closely correlated with human brain cortex activation and can be checked by brainwave analysis.

본 연구는 인성과 뇌파의 상관관계를 알아보고자 하는 것이 목적이다. 연구의 대상자로는 기업체에 근무하는 팀장급 40명을 대상으로 인성검사와 뇌파측정을 동시에 진행하고 결과에 대한 상관관계를 분석하였다. 인성검사는 Big 5 검사지를 이용하였고, 뇌파검사는 2-Channel System 뇌파측정기를 이용하여 Fp1과 Fp2에서 측정하였다. 연구결과는 Big 5의 수용성은 BQ의 자기조절지수중 휴식상태 즉, 알파파의 활성화 정도와 정적 상관관계가 있고, 개방성은 자기조절지수중 집중상태 즉, 저베타파와 부적 상관관계가 있다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 이는 사람의 인성이 대뇌피질의 활성화와 관련이 있으며 뇌파분석을 통해서도 알 수 있다는데 의미가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barney, J.B. "Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  2. Baum, J.R. & S. Wally "Strategic Decision Speed and Firm Performance", Strategic Management journal, 2003
  3. Hogan,R. & Roberts,B.W. "Personality measurement and employment decision", American psychologist, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.5.469
  4. Salgado J.F. "The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community", Journal of Applied psychology, 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30
  5. Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. "The BIG Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance : A Meta-Analysis, Personnel Psychology", 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
  6. In-suk Lee, "An Analysis of Big 5 Personality Model and Business Ethics as Factors for Organizational Effectiveness", Journal of Korean Academic Society of Business and Administration, Vol 32, No.6, pp 1593-1621, 2003
  7. Dong-hoon Lee, "The Comparison Between Job Performance and Big Five Personality Traitors in Workplace", Vocational education and research, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2010
  8. Yeon-Tack Choi, "A study on the MBTI, task type and Performance of organizational member : Focusing on behavior patterns, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2009
  9. Seong-Bum Kim, "A study on the Top Executives; MBTI", Industrial Economic Research, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2003
  10. Naumann E.(1998) "Extraversion, neuroticism, and event-related brain potentials in response to emotional stimuli, Personality and Individual", 1998
  11. Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa, Jr. NEO Personality Inventory Revised (NEO-PI-R), 1992
  12. Bruce Thompson, "Construct Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164486463032
  13. Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa, Jr. "Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 52(1), pp. 81-90, Jan 1987. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
  14. Laursen,K. & Salter,A. "Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K Manufacturing Firms.",Strategic Management Journal, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  15. Y. J. Kim, "Development of Brain Circulation Learning Model Based on EEG Analysis of Learning Activities", Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University, 2000.
  16. P. W. Park, "Foundation of Neurofeedback" Seoul:Korea Research Institute Jungshin Science, 2005a
  17. H. R. Park, "The Effects of Neurofeedback Training on the Children of the Socio-Economically Weak Class", Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul University of Buddhism, 2015
  18. D.S. Kim and J.W Choi,, EEG Analysis, Koryo Medicine. 2001
  19. M .H. Ahn "Analysis on The Reflection Degree of Worker's Stress by Brain-waves based Anti-Stress Quotient", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society Vol. 11, No. 10 pp. 3833-3838, 2010 https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.10.3833
  20. Bruce, J. & Fisch, M. D. Fisch & Spehlmann's EEG primer, (3rd ED.) Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam. 1999
  21. Kamiya, J. (1972). Self-Regulation as An Aid to Human Performance: Annual Progress Report, SanFrancisco: Submitted to The San Diego University Foundation, Langhy Porte Neuropsychiatric Institute.
  22. Sterman, M. B. (1977). Sensory-motor EEG operant conditioning: Experimental and Clinical effect, Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 12, pp. 63-92.
  23. Lubar, Joel F., et al. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in TOVA scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance." Biofeedback and Self-regulation 20.1 (1995): 83-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01712768
  24. Samuel D. Gosling, Peter J. Rentfrow, and William B. Swann Jr. "A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains", Journal of Research in Personality 37 (2003) 504-528 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1