DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Emission Characteristics of Blue Fluorescent OLED with Anode Materials

양극 물질에 따른 청색 형광 OLED의 발광 특성

  • Kong, Do-Hoon (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Daejin University) ;
  • Lee, Yo-Seb (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Daejin University) ;
  • Ju, Sung-Hoo (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Daejin University) ;
  • Yang, Jae-Woong (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Daejin University)
  • 공도훈 (대진대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 이요셉 (대진대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 주성후 (대진대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 양재웅 (대진대학교 신소재공학과)
  • Received : 2015.06.17
  • Accepted : 2015.06.26
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

We studied the blue fluorescent OLED with Mg:Ag, Al, Ni as anode materials. Blue fluorescent OLEDs were fabricated using Anode / $MoO_3$ (3 nm) / 2-TNATA (60 nm) / NPB (30 nm) / SH-1 : BD-2 (5 vol.%, 30 nm) / Bphen (40 nm) / Liq (1 nm) / Al (150 nm). Current density of OLED with Mg:Ag was not measured due to too low work function, and that of OLED with Al showed $45.2mA/cm^2$ at 12 V. Luminance and Current efficiency of OLED with Al showed $385.1cd/m^2$ and 0.9 cd/A. Current density of OLED with Ni of 8, 10, 12 nm thickness showed 10, 12.9, $37.2mA/cm^2$, respectively. Luminance and Current efficiency of OLED with Ni of 8, 10, 12 nm thickness showed 670.9, 991.2, $1,320cd/m^2$ and 6.7, 7.7, 3.6 cd/A, respectively. Transmittance of Al was 52.2% at 476 nm wavelength and that of Ni of 8, 10, 12 nm thickness was 79, 77, 74 %, respectively. In spite of best current density, OLED with Al showed the lowest luminance and current efficiency because of low work function and poor transmittance. When thickness of Ni was increased to 12nm, current efficiency was sharply lower owing to bad transmittance and unbalance of holes and electrons. Finally, OLED with Ni of 10 nm thicknes showed the highest current efficiency.

Keywords

References

  1. T.H. Kwak, S.H. Ju, J. Kor. Inst. Surf. Eng., 47 (2014) 201
  2. K.Y. Lee, S.I. Kim, J.Y. Kim, K.E. Kwon, Y.W. Kang, J.W. Son, J.W. Jeon, M.C. Kim, C.W. Lee, Journal of the Korean Vacuum Society, 21 (2012) 328 https://doi.org/10.5757/JKVS.2012.21.6.328
  3. S.M. park, H.G. kim, D.C. Lee, The Transactions of the Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers, 52 (2003) 261
  4. Xinjun Xu, Gui Yu, Yunqi Liu, Daoben Zhu, Oraganic Displays, 27 (2006) 24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2005.02.008
  5. Nam-Gyu Hwang, Young-Chan Kim, Se-Won Choi, Chang-Seok Kang, Sung-Kil Hong, Korea Institute of industrial Technology, 31 (2011) 130
  6. Samuel J. Rosenberg, Nationl Bureau of Standards Monograph, 106 (1968) 19
  7. Heqing Tang, Haixing Liao, Lihua Zhu, Chemical Physics Letters, 381 (2003) 605 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2003.10.047
  8. F. Garten, J. Vrijmoeth, A.R. Schlatmann, R.E. Gill, T.M. Klapwijk, G. Hadziioannou, Syntheric Metals, 76 (1996) 85 https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-6779(95)03424-I
  9. S. Cheylan, D.S. Ghosh, D. Krautz, T.L. Chen, V. Pruneri, Organic Electronics, 12 (2011) 818 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2011.02.015