디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제13권6호
  • /
  • Pages.205-212
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

거울되먹임 융합 치료가 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 근활성도와 상지 기능에 미치는 영향

The Feedback Mirror Therapy in Stroke Patients Effect of Muscle Activity and Function of the Upper Extremity

  • 투고 : 2015.04.02
  • 심사 : 2015.06.20
  • 발행 : 2015.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 거울되먹임치료를 이용하여 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 근육 활성도와 상지 기능적 평가에 미치는 효과에 대하여 알아보고자 하였다. 환자는 거울되먹임 치료군 8명과 동작관찰 훈련군 8명으로 나누어 총 8주간 주 5회, 30분간 시행하였고, 상지 기능을 평가하기 위해 뇌졸중 기능회복 평가와 도수 기능 검사를 이용하였다. 위등세모근, 중간어깨세모근, 위팔두갈래근, 노쪽손목굽힘근, 긴노쪽손목폄근의 근활성도를 평가하기 위해 표면 근전도 시스템을 이용하였고, 연구 결과 노쪽손목굽힘근을 제외한 위등세모근, 중간어깨세모근, 위팔두갈래근, 긴노쪽손목폄근의 근활성도와 뇌졸중 기능회복 검사, 도수 기능 검사 점수에서 대조군과 실험군 모두 전, 후 유의한 차이를 보였다. 이에 따라 거울되먹임 치료가 동작관찰 훈련보다 상지 근활성도와 상지 기능을 향상시키는데 효과적임을 알 수 있었다.

The purpose of this study was to find out the effect that muscle activity of upper extremity and functional test in the case of the stroke patient by using the feedback mirror therapy. Sixteen subjects were recruited and randomly divided into two groups. one group was trained feedback mirror therapy and other group was action observation training. This process was carried out five times a week for eight weeks. To upper extremity test was used to MFT, FMA and in order to test UT, DM, BB, FCR, ECRL used to muscle activity. After the training, exclude FCR an upper extremity motor function of target showed significant difference between two groups and especially an experimental group showed significant muscle activity and MFT, FMA score improvement of UT, DM, BB, ECRL. Therefore, feedback mirror therapy is more upper extremity motor function and muscle activity improvement effect than action observation training.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. B. J. Jeon, A Case Study on the SS-QOL of Stroke Patients Receiving CIMT, The Journal of korean Society Occupational Therapy Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 39-48, 2004.
  2. Park S, Patten C, Strengthening to promote functional recovery poststroke: an evidence based review. Top Stroke Rehabil. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 177-199, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1503-177
  3. Canning C.G, Ada L, Adams R, Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity, Clinical Rehabilitaion, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 300-308, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr715oa
  4. Patten C, Lexell J, Brown, H.E, Weakness and strength training in persons with poststroke hemiplegia: rationale, method, and efficacy. journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 41, No. 3A, pp. 293-312, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2004.03.0293
  5. Hufschmidt A, Mauritz. K.H, Chronic transformation of muscle in spasticity: a peripheral contribution to increased ton. Journal of Neurology. Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. Vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 676-685, 2007.
  6. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke rehabilitation: Guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill, pp.42, Butterworth -Heinemann, 2003.
  7. Langhorn P, Coupar F, Pollock A, Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review, The LANCET Neurology. Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 741-754, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4
  8. Van der Lee J.H, Wagenaar R.C, Lankhorst G.J, Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial, Stroke, Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 2369-2375, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2369
  9. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar R.C, Kollen B.J, Predicting disability in stroke - A critical review of the literature. Age Ageing, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 479-489, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/25.6.479
  10. M. K. Son, E. S. Kim, S. W. Park, The Effect of Modified Constraint induced Movement Therapy for the Stroke Patients in Inpatient Setting, J Korean Acad Rehab Med, Vol. 31, pp. 56-62, 2007.
  11. S. Y. Park, I. S. Shin, Meta-Analysis of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Hemiplegic Stroke Patient in Korea, Phys Ther Kor, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2012.
  12. Prange G.B, Jannink M.J, Groothuis-Oud shoorn, C.G, Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke, Journal of Reha bilitation Research and Development, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 171-184, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0076
  13. Ramachandran V.S, Rogers Ramachandran D, Synaesthesia in phantom limb sinduced with mirrors. ProBiolSci,Vol. 263, No. 1369, pp. 377-386, 1996.
  14. W. H. Soon, K. Y. Chang W. K. B. Park, The Effects of Mirror Therapy on the Hand Function Recovery in Chronic Stroke Patients, The Journal of korean Society Occupational Therapy, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 93-103, 2011.
  15. Garry M.I, Loftus A, Summers J.J, Mirror, mirroron thewall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1excitability, Exp BrainRes, Vol. 163, pp. 118-122, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9
  16. Rothgangel, Bruan, Beurskens, Seitz & Wade,2011
  17. Page S.J, Levine P, Sisto S.A, Mental practice combined with physical practice for upper-limb motor deficit in subacute stroe, Phys Ther, Vol. 81, No. 8, pp. 1455-1462, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/81.8.1455
  18. Jack D, Boian R, Merians A.S, Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation, Tran sactions on Neural Systems and Reha bilitation Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 308-318, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/7333.948460
  19. Van Vliet P.M, Wulf G, Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? DisabRehabil, Vol. 28, pp. 831 -840, 2003.
  20. Rizzo A.A, Bowerly T, Buckwalter J.G, A virtual reality scenario for allseasons: the virtual classroom, CNS Spectrums, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 35-44, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900024196
  21. Stevens, J.A, Stoykov M.E.P, Using Motor Imagery in the Rehabilitation of Hemiparesis, Archives of Physical Medicine and Reha bilitation, Vol. 84, No. 7, pp. 1090-1092, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00042-X
  22. M. M. Lee, H. Y. Cho, C. H. Song, The mirror therapy program enhances upper limb motor recovery and motor function in acute stroke patients, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vol. 91, No. 8, pp. 689-696, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31824fa86d
  23. Cools A.M, Declercq G.A, Cambier D.C, Trapezius activity and intramuscular balance during isokinetic exercise in overhead with impingement syndrome, Scand J Med Sports, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 23-33, 2007.
  24. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson L.R, Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke, Physical Therapy, Vol. 73, No. 7, pp. 447-454, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/73.7.447
  25. Miyamoto S, Kondo T, Suzukamo Y, Reliability and validity of the manual function test in patients with stroke, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 247-55, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181951133
  26. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Mirror Therapy Improves Hand Function in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Arch PhysMedRehabil, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 393-398, 2008.
  27. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning, Nature, Vol. 377, No. 6545, pp. 155-158, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1038/377155a0
  28. Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Wissel J, Early consolidation in human primary cortex, Nature, Vol. 415, No. 6872, pp. 640-644, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature712
  29. Holm T, Maria B, Marco W, Mirror therapy for patients with severe arm paresis after stroke -A randomized controlled trial, Clin ical Rehabilitation, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 314-324, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215512455651
  30. Sathian K, Greenspan A.I, Wolf S.L, Doing it with mirrors: A case tudy of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation, Neuroreha bilitation Neural Repair, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 73-76, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596830001400109
  31. Stevens J.A, Stoykov M.E.P, Using Motor Imagery in the Rehabilitation of Hemiparesis, Archives of Physical Medicine and Reha bilitation, Vol. 84, No. 7, pp. 1090-1092, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00042-X
  32. Giraux P, Sirigu A, Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity, Neuroimage, Vol. 20, pp. 107-111, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.024
  33. Summers J.J, Kagerer F.A, Garry M.I, Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: A TMS study, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Vol. 252, No. 1, pp. 76- 82, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2006.10.011
  34. Carson R.G, Neural pathways mediating bilateral interactions between the upper limbs, Brain Res Brain Res Rev, Vol. 49, pp. 641-662, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.03.005
  35. Cauraugh J.H, Summers J.J, Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke, Prog Neurobiol, Vol. 75, pp. 309-320, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001
  36. Sutbeyaz S, Yavuzer G, Sezer N, Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: A randomized controlled trial, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 555-559, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.034