Journal of Gastric Cancer

The Korean Gastric Cancer Association (대한위암학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Unaided Stapling Technique for Pure Single-Incision Distal Gastrectomy in Early Gastric Cancer: Unaided Delta-Shaped Anastomosis and Uncut Roux-en-Y Anastomosis

  • Suh, Yun-Suhk (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Ji-Ho (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae Han (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Huh, Yeon-Ju (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Young Gil (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Jun-Young (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kong, Seong-Ho (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hyuk-Joon (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Han-Kwang (Department of Surgery and Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.04.27
  • Accepted : 2015.05.15
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Intracorporeal anastomosis is the most difficult procedure during pure single-incision distal gastrectomy (SIDG) that affects its generalization. We introduced unaided delta-shaped anastomosis (uDelta), a novel anastomosis technique, for gastroduodenostomy after pure SIDG, and compared the results with those of previously reported Roux-en-Y anastomosis (RY). Materials and Methods: Between March 2014 and March 2015, SIDG with D1+ lymph node dissection was performed for early gastric cancer through a 2.5-cm transumbilical incision without any additional port. uDelta was performed by the operator alone, without any intracorporeal assistance. Results: uDelta was performed on 11 patents, and uncut RY was performed on 5-patients without open or multiport conversion. R0 resection was performed in all cases. No significant differences were observed in mean age and body mass index between patients who underwent uDelta or RY. Mean operation times were $214.5{\pm}36.2$ minutes for uDelta and $240.8{\pm}65.9$ minutes for RY, which was not significantly different. Reconstruction time for uDelta was shorter than that for RY, with marginal statistical significance ($26.1{\pm}8.3$ minutes vs. $38.0{\pm}9.1$ minutes, P=0.05). There were no intraoperative transfusions, 30-day mortality, or anastomosis-related complications in either group. Average length of hospital stay was $8.2{\pm}1.9$ days in the uDelta group and $7.2{\pm}0.8$ days in the RY group (P=0.320). Conclusions: After carefully considering indications, uDelta can be a feasible and can be a reproducible reconstruction method after SIDG in early gastric cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Yang HK, Suh YS, Lee HJ. Minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer-Korean experience. J Surg Oncol 2013;107:277-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23179
  2. Oh SY, Kwon S, Lee KG, Suh YS, Choe HN, Kong SH, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution. Surg Endosc 2014;28:789-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3256-1
  3. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report: a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 2010;251:417-420. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b
  4. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1205-1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0
  5. Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Abellan I, Parrilla P. Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 2013;257:413-418. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318278d225
  6. Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, Tori M, Ueshima S, Nishida T. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2400-2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1563-3
  7. Omori T, Tanaka K, Tori M, Ueshima S, Akamatsu H, Nishida T. Intracorporeal circular-stapled Billroth I anastomosis in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1490-1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2034-1
  8. Ahn SH, Son SY, Lee CM, Jung do H, Park do J, Kim HH. Intracorporeal uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy reconstruction in pure single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: unaided stapling closure. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:e17-e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.009
  9. Ahn SH, Son SY, Jung do H, Park do J, Kim HH. Pure singleport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: comparative study with multi-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2014;219:933-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.009
  10. Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 2011;11:69-77. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69
  11. Lee HJ, Shiraishi N, Kim HH, Hiki N, Uyama I, Choi SH, et al. Standard of practice on laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in Korea and Japan: experts' survey. Asian J Endosc Surg 2012;5:5-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00111.x
  12. Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H, Tamaki N, Isobe H, Katayama T, et al. Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:284-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01239-5
  13. Okabe H, Obama K, Tsunoda S, Tanaka E, Sakai Y. Advantage of completely laparoscopic gastrectomy with linear stapled reconstruction: a long-term follow-up study. Ann Surg 2014;259:109-116. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828dfa5d
  14. Park do J, Lee JH, Ahn SH, Eng AK, Kim HH. Single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+${\beta}$ lymph node dissection for gastric cancers: report of 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:e214-e216. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e318253df9b
  15. Omori T, Masuzawa T, Akamatsu H, Nishida T. A simple and safe method for Billroth I reconstruction in single-incision laparoscopic gastrectomy using a novel intracorporeal triangular anastomotic technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2014;18:613-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2419-7
  16. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4
  17. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2009.
  18. Ozdemir BA, Thomas RL, Soon Y. Single-port laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with DI${\alpha}$ lymphadenectomy. Surg Innov 2011;18:NP1-NP4.
  19. Kong J, Wu SD, Su Y. Translumenal single-incision laparoscopy radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer: primary experience with less invasive surgery in China. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013;23:141-145. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2012.0332
  20. Kanaya S, Kawamura Y, Kawada H, Iwasaki H, Gomi T, Satoh S, et al. The delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: analysis of the initial 100 consecutive procedures of intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:365-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0054-0
  21. Kitagami H, Morimoto M, Nozawa M, Nakamura K, Tanimura S, Murakawa K, et al. Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2137-2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6
  22. Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, et al; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a largescale Korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2692-2700. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0075-z

Cited by

  1. Single Port Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer vol.19, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2016.19.2.45
  2. Single-Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Tract Reconstruction for Early Gastric Cancer: Report of a Case vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.200
  3. Uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.10, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2016.1248404
  4. A comparative study of delta-shaped and conventional Billroth I anastomosis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.31, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5344-5
  5. Single-incision Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer vol.17, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e29
  6. Three-Port Right-Side Approach-Duet Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Uncut Roux-en-Y Reconstruction vol.28, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0331
  7. Curative Effect of Digestive Tract Reconstruction After Radical Gastrectomy for Distal Gastric Cancer vol.28, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0605
  8. Revisiting Laparoscopic Reconstruction for Billroth 1 Versus Billroth 2 Versus Roux-en-Y After Distal Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in the Modern Era vol.43, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04943-x
  9. Comparing the surgical outcomes of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and three-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.100, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2021.100.1.18
  10. Uncut Roux-en-Y might reduce the rate of reflux gastritis after radical distal gastrectomy: An evidence mapping from a systematic review vol.97, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106184