DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

색상차이에 따른 FRC-포스트와 코어 사이의 구별

Discrimination between FRC-post and core according to the color difference

  • 김주회 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김진우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조경모 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박세희 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Kim, Jou-Hwe (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.13
  • 심사 : 2015.05.31
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30

초록

목적: 이번 연구의 목적은 FRC-포스트와 코어가 색상차이에 따라 구별되는 정도를 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 실험을 위해 유사한 크기(${\pm}0.5 mm$)와 길이(${\pm}0.5 mm$)의 발치 한 하악 소구치 9개를 근관 형성하고 충전하였다. 3개의 치근을 체온을 재현하기 위해 $37^{\circ}C$ 물이 흐르는 가는 실리콘 튜브로 감은 후 cold mounting resin에 매몰하여 각 3개의 치근이 매몰된 총 3개의 시편을 제작하였다. 개개의 시편 치근에는 3종류의 $Snowpost^{(R)}$, MACRO-$LOCK^{TM}$ POST $ILLUSION^{TM}$ $XRO^{(R)}$, FRC $Postec^{(R)}$ Plus post를 이용하여 각각의 포스트에 맞게 공간을 형성하고 포스트를 접착하였다. 3개의 시편 별로 $Luxacore^{(R)}$ Dual Blue, $Luxacore^{(R)}$ Dual A3 및 $Filtek^{TM}$ Z350 XT A1E로 코어를 축조, 시편 별로 다른 코어를 사용하였다. 각 시편에 대해 온도를 낮추기 위한 압축공기를 불 때와 안 불 때로 나누어 디지털 이미지를 촬영하였다. 치과의사 50명과 치과대학 대학생 50명 총 100명에게 어떤 포스트가 코어와 가장 구별이 잘되는 지를 설문조사 하였다. 결과: $Luxacore^{(R)}$ Dual Blue에서는 $Snowpost^{(R)}$가, $Luxacore^{(R)}$ Dual A3에서는 $Snowpost^{(R)}$가, $Filtek^{TM}$ Z350 A1E에서는 MACRO-$LOCK^{TM}$ POST $ILLUSION^{TM}$ $XRO^{(R)}$가 구별이 가장 잘되었다. 압축공기를 불어 온도를 내리면 나타나는 MACRO-$LOCK^{TM}$ $ILLUSION^{TM}$ $XRO^{(R)}$의 색은 포스트와 코어의 구별을 더 용이하게 하였다. 결론: FRC-포스트와 복합레진 코어가 구별되는 정도는 색상차이에 따라 다름을 알 수 있었다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate which FRC-posts were more distinguishable from core. Materials and Methods: Nine extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars with similar lengths (${\pm}0.5 mm$) and widths (${\pm}0.5 mm$) were endodontically treated and obturated. One specimen which the three roots were embedded in a cold mounting resin was made. 3 specimens were made by this method. Post spaces were prepared for the following post system: FRC $Postec^{(R)}$ Plus, MACRO-$LOCK^{TM}$ POST $ILLUSION^{TM}$ $XRO^{(R)}$, $Snowpost^{(R)}$. After three different posts were placed in the roots of a specimen, each three specimens received a direct core build-up: $Luxacore^{(R)}$ Dual A3, $Luxacore^{(R)}$ Dual blue, $Filtek^{TM}$ Z350 A1E. Digital images were taken of the post and core with and without air-blowing. We asked to fifty dentists and fifty dental college students which post was more clearly discriminated from the core. Results: In surveys, when core was $Luxacore^{(R)}$ Dual blue, among three types of posts people more easily discriminated the $Snowpost^{(R)}$ from core. When core was $Luxacore^{(R)}$ Dual A3, among three types of posts people similarly more easily discriminated $Snowpost^{(R)}$ from core. When core was $Filtek^{TM}$ Z350 A1E, among three types of posts people more easily discriminated distinguished MACRO-$LOCK^{TM}$ POST $ILLUSION^{TM}$ $XRO^{(R)}$ post from core. People more easily distinguished MACRO-$LOCK^{TM}$ POST $ILLUSION^{TM}$ $XRO^{(R)}$ post from core when temperature was lowered by air-blowing. Conclusion: Ability to discriminate between FRC-post and core is different according to color contrast. MACRO-$LOCK^{TM}$ POST $ILLUSION^{TM}$ $XRO^{(R)}$ posts are more discriminable when temperature is lowered by air-blowing.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Sjogren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;30:297-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00714.x
  2. Strindberg LZ. The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors. An analytic study based on radiographic and clinical followup examinations. Acta Odont Scand 1956;14(Suppl 21):1-175. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016355609007499
  3. Dixon EB, Kaczkowski PJ, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. Comparison of two ultrasonic instruments for post removal. J Endod 2002;28:111-5.
  4. Stamos DE, Gutmann JL. Survey of endodontic retreatment methods used to remove intraradicular posts. J Endod 1993;19:366-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81365-8
  5. Lindemann M, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Herrero AA. Comparison of the efficiency and effectiveness of various techniques for removal of fiber posts. J Endod 2005;31:520-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000167397.60943.6e
  6. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. A new concept of corono-radicular reconstruction, the Composipost (2). Chir Dent Fr 1990;60:69-77.
  7. Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers JC. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J Endod 2003;29:125-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200302000-00010
  8. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002;28:629-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200209000-00001
  9. Martelli R. Fourth-generation intraradicular posts for the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:579-84; quiz 586-8.
  10. Quintas AF, Dinato JC, Bottino MA. Aesthetic posts and cores for metal-free restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:875-84; quiz 886.
  11. Gesi A, Magnolfi S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Comparison of two techniques for removing fiber posts. J Endod 2003;29:580-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200309000-00009
  12. Anderson GC, Perdigao J, Hodges JS, Bowles WR. Efficiency and effectiveness of fiber post removal using 3 techniques. Quintessence Int 2007;38:663-70.
  13. Frazer RQ, Kovarik RE, Chance KB, Mitchell RJ. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts. Am J Dent 2008;21:175-8.
  14. Park SJ, Lee HY, Nah MY, Chang HS, Hwang YC, Oh WM, Hwang IN. The evaluation of color and color difference according to the layering placement of Incisal shade composites on the body composites of the indirect resin restoration. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36:37-49. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.1.37
  15. Yu B, Ahn JS, Le e YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol 2009;67:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350802577818
  16. Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:79-86.
  17. Ryan EA, Tam LE, McComb D. Comparative translucency of esthetic composite resin restorative materials. J Can Dent Asso 2010;76:a84.
  18. Goracci C, Corciolani G, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Lighttransmitting ability of marketed fiber posts. J Dent Res 2008;87:1122-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701208
  19. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;16:498-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80180-4
  20. Tronstad L, Asbjørnsen K, Døving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen HM. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:218-21. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016005218.x
  21. Abbott PV. Analysis of a referral-based endodontic practice: part 2. treatment provided. J Endod 1994;20:253-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80289-X
  22. Ferrari M. Introduction. In: Ferrari M, Breschi L, Grandini S, editors. Fiber posts and endodontically treated teeth: a compendium of scientific and clinical perspectives. Wendywood; Modern Dentistry Media; 2008. p. 9-13.
  23. de Rijk WG. Removal of fiber posts from endodontically treated teeth. Am J Dent 2000;13:19B-21B.
  24. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:605-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00149.x
  25. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent Mater 2004;20: 530-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2002.11.001
  26. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018
  27. Ragain JC, Johnston WM. Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers. Color Res Appl 2000;25:278-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6378(200008)25:4<278::AID-COL8>3.0.CO;2-F