DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison analysis of superconducting solenoid magnet systems for ECR ion source based on the evolution strategy optimization

  • Received : 2015.02.23
  • Accepted : 2015.06.11
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

Electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) ion source is an essential component of heavy-ion accelerator. For a given design, the intensities of the highly charged ion beams extracted from the source can be increased by enlarging the physical volume of ECR zone [1]. Several models for ECR ion source were and will be constructed depending on their operating conditions [2-4]. In this paper three simulation models with 3, 4 and 6 solenoid system were built, but it's not considered anything else except the number of coils. Two groups of optimization analysis are presented, and the evolution strategy (ES) is adopted as an optimization tool which is a technique based on the ideas of mutation, adaptation and annealing [5]. In this research, the volume of ECR zone was calculated approximately, and optimized designs for ECR solenoid magnet system were presented. Firstly it is better to make the volume of ECR zone large to increase the intensity of ion beam under the specific confinement field conditions. At the same time the total volume of superconducting solenoids must be decreased to save material. By considering the volume of ECR zone and the total length of solenoids in each model with different number of coils, the 6 solenoid system represented the highest coil performance. By the way, a certain case, ECR zone volume itself can be essential than the cost. So the maximum ECR zone volume for each solenoid magnet system was calculated respectively with the same size of the plasma chamber and the total magnet space. By comparing the volume of ECR zone, the 6 solenoid system can be also made with the maximum ECR zone volume.

Keywords

References

  1. G. D. Alton, Y. Liu, Y. Kawai, and H. Bilheux, "The ECR volume effect and its consequence," IEEE Conference Record - Abstracts, Plasma Science, ICOPS, 2006.
  2. C. Lyneis, D. Leitner, M. Leitner, C. Taylor, and S. Abbott, "The third generation superconducting 28 GHz electron cyclotron resonance ion source VENUS," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 81, pp. 02A201, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3271135
  3. S. Choi, Y. Kim, I. S. Hong and D. Jeon, "Superconducting Magnet for the RAON electron cyclotron resonance ion source," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 85, pp. 02A906, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4825384
  4. J. Ohnishi, A. Goto, Y. Higurashi, K. Kusaka, T. Minato, T. Nakagawa, and H. Okuno, "Construction and test of the superconducting coils for RIKEN SC-ECR ion source," Proc. EPAC08, pp. 43, 2008.
  5. Nikolaus Hansen, The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorial, June 28, 2011.
  6. Claude M. Lyneis, D. Leitner, D. S. Todd, G. Sabbi, S. Prestemon,S. Caspi and P. Ferracin. "Fourth generation electron cyclotron resonance ion sources," Review of scientific instruments, vol. 79, pp. 02A321, 2008.
  7. R. Geller, Electron Cyclotron Resonance Ion Sources and ECR Plasma, IOP, Bristol, 1996.
  8. G. D. Alton, J. Dellwo, and R.F. Welton, "Computational studies for an advanced design ECR ion source," Proceedings of the IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, vol. 2, pp. 1022-1024, 1995.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Optimization of an HTS Quadrupole Magnet System for a Heavy Ion Accelerator Through Evolution Strategy vol.26, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2516907
  2. A Study on the Sextupole Design with Iron Yoke Inside Solenoids for 56 GHz ECR Ion Sources vol.28, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2777861
  3. A Study on the Design of Full-LTS 18-GHz ECR Ion Source for Heavy Ion Accelerator vol.26, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2517324
  4. A study on the design of hexapole in an 18-GHz ECR ion source for heavy ion accelerators vol.18, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9714/psac.2016.18.2.025
  5. Control the length of beam trajectory with a quadruple triplet for heavy ion accelerator vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9714/psac.2016.18.4.040