DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Observed Discharge Data on Regional Flood Frequency Analysis in the Han River Basin

한강유역 관측유출자료가 지역홍수빈도분석 결과에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Nam Won (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Eun (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jeongwoo (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Jung, Yong (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wonkwang University)
  • 김남원 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 이정은 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 이정우 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 정용 (원광대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • Received : 2015.04.03
  • Accepted : 2015.05.21
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of uncertainties in flood data on the results of flood frequency analysis for Han river basin. To meet this aim, this study quantified assessment focused on the index flood and quantile by regional flood frequency analysis using the flood data from 17 water level gauges in Han river basin. We analysed the results categorized by three cases according to the characteristics of the measured data. Firstly, we analyzed the regional flood frequency for the water level gauge in the Pyungchang river basin to investigate the impact of water level data. The results has the error of 0.240 with respect to the mean flood. Secondly, we examined the impact of uncertainty in measurement data generated by the application of rating on the results of regional flood frequency analysis. We have compared the results by applying the rating estimated for each year to the one by the recently estimated rating. The results showed that the mean error has 0.246 in terms of the mean flood. Finally, we have inferred the regional flood frequency analysis results with the regulated flow in the downstream area of dams. The regulated specific discharge in the downstream area of dams controlled by dam operation showed a large difference to the estimated specific discharge in the downstream area of dams by extension of the natural specific discharge in the upstream area using the regionalization method.

본 연구에서는 한강유역을 대상으로 관측홍수량 자료의 불확실성이 홍수빈도분석 결과에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 한강유역 내의 17개 수위관측지점의 홍수량 자료를 이용하여, 지역홍수빈도분석을 수행한 결과인 지수홍수와 분위수를 중심으로 정량적인 평가를 수행하였다. 연구결과는 관측자료의 특성에 따라 3가지 경우로 분류하여 분석하였다. 첫 번째로 수위자료의 영향을 파악하기 위해 평창강 유역의 수위관측지점을 대상으로 지역홍수빈도분석 결과를 분석하면, 평균홍수량에 대한 오차는 0.240으로 평가되었다. 두 번째로 레이팅 적용에 따른 관측자료의 불확실성이 지역홍수빈도분석 결과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 해당연도에 개발된 레이팅을 각각 적용한 결과와 가장 최근 개발된 레이팅을 적용한 결과를 분석해보면, 평균홍수량에 대한 오차는 평균 0.246으로 평가되었다. 마지막으로 인위적으로 유량이 조절된 댐하류의 통제된 흐름영역에서의 지역홍수빈도 분석 결과를 유추하였다. 댐하류에서의 홍수량 거동은 댐운영에 의해 조절된 것으로 댐상류의 자연유역에서의 비유량 지역화 결과를 연장할 경우, 댐하류의 조절유역에서의 비유량 거동과 큰 차이를 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Burnham, M.W. (1980). Adoption of flood flowfrequency estimates at ungaged location, Training Document 11, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
  2. Chow, V.T. (1951). "A general formula for hydrologic frequency analysis." Transactions, American Geophysical Union, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR032i002p00231
  3. Darymple, T. (1960). Flood frequency analysis, manual of hydrology, Part 3, Flood-flowTechniques, U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply paper 1543-A, pp. 1-79.
  4. Di Baldassarre, G., Laio, F., and Montanari, A. (2012). "Effect of observation errors on the uncertainty of design floods." Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, Vol. 42-44, pp. 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.05.001
  5. Domeneghetti, A., Castellarin, A., and Brath, A. (2012). "Assessing rating-curve uncertainty and its effects on hydraulic model calibration." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 16, pp. 1191-1202. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1191-2012
  6. EU ISO EN 748:1997 (1997). Measurement of liquid flow in open channel -velocity- area methods.
  7. Fuller, W.E. (1914). "Flood flows." Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 77, No. 1293, pp. 564-617.
  8. Hosking, J.R.M., and Wallis, J.R. (1997). Regional frequency analysis, An Approach Based on L-Moment, Cambridge University Press.
  9. IACWD (1982). Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency, Bulletin 17B (revised and corrected), Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Office of Water Data Coordination, Reston, VA.
  10. IE (1987). Australian rainfall and runoff: A guide to flood estimation, Volume 1, Editor: D. H. Pilgrim, Institution of Engineers, Australia.
  11. IH (1999). Flood estimation handbook, 5 Volumes. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
  12. Kennedy, E.J. (1984). Discharge ratings at gaging stations, Techniques of water-resources investigations of the U. S. Geological Survey, USGS-TWRI Book 3, Chapter A10.
  13. Kim, N.W. (1996). Study on reservoir operations during the dry and flood season in Soyanggang dam watershed, Korea Institute of Construction Technology.
  14. Kim, N.W. (1998). "Current state and improvement direction of Hydrological observation." Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Engineering and Construction Technology Information, Vol. 176, pp. 9-15.
  15. Kim, N.W., and Won, Y.S. (2004). "Estimates of regional flood frequency in Korea." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 1019-1032. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.12.1019
  16. Kim, N.W., Yong, J., and Lee, J.E. (2014). "Spatial extension of runoff data in the applications of a lumped concept model." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 921-932. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.9.921
  17. Ko, J.U. (1977). "Regional flood frequency studies in Korean rivers." The Magazine of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 95-102.
  18. Kuczera, G. (1996). "Correlated rating curve error in flood frequency inference."Water Resources Research, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 2119-2127. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00804
  19. MC (1985). International hydrological programme research report, Ministry of Construction.
  20. MC (1986). International hydrological programme research report, Ministry of Construction.
  21. MC (1991). Research on development of water resource management technology, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Ministry of Construction, 1991.
  22. MC (1993). Research on development of water resource management technology, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Ministry of Construction, 1993.
  23. MCT (2000a). Research on development ofwater resource management technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, Analysis of Temporal Variations of Determining the Local Design Storms, Ministry of Construction and Transportation, 1999.
  24. MCT (2000b). Research on development ofwater resource management technology, Vol. 1, Estimation of probability rainfall in Korea, Ministry of Construction and Transportation, 1999.
  25. MCT (2007). Guideline for design flood estimation, Ministry of Construction and Transportation
  26. Merz, B., and Thieken, A.H. (2005). "Separating natural and epistemic uncertainty in flood frequency analysis." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 309, No. 1, pp. 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.11.015
  27. MLTM (2010a). Annual hydrological report on Korea, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  28. MLTM (2010b). Research on advancement of design flood estimation, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  29. MLTM (2011). Improvement and supplement of probability rainfall in South Korea, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  30. MLTM (2012). Hydrologic investigation report, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  31. NERC (1975). Flood studies report, 5 Volumes, Natural Environment Research Council, London.
  32. O'Connell, P.P.L. (1868). "On the relation of the freshwater floods of rivers to the areas and physical features of their basins and on a method of classifying rivers and streams with reference to the magnitude of their floods." Minutes Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 27, Session 1868, pp. 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1680/imotp.1868.23121
  33. Potter, K.W., and Walker, J.F. (1981). "A model of discontinuous measurement error and its effects on the probability distribution of flood discharge measurements." Water Resources Research, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 1505-1509. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR017i005p01505
  34. Potter, K.W., and Walker, J.F. (1985). "An empirical study of flood measurement error."Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 403-406. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i003p00403
  35. Rantz, S.E., and others (1982). Measurement and computation of streamflow: Volume 2. Computation of discharge, U. S. Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 2175.

Cited by

  1. Regional frequency analysis using spatial data extension method : II .Flood frequency inference for ungaged watersheds vol.49, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.5.451
  2. Regional frequency analysis using spatial data extension method : I. An empirical investigation of regional flood frequency analysis vol.49, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.5.439
  3. Estimating design floods for ungauged basins in the geum-river basin through regional flood frequency analysis using L-moments method vol.49, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.8.645