References
- Baltas, E.A., Dervos, N.A., and Mimikou, M.A. (2007). Technical Note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 1825-1829. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1825-2007
- Beck, H.E., De Jeu, R.A.M., Schellekens, J., van Dijk, A.I.J.M., and Bruijnzeel, L.A. (2009). Improving curve number based storm runoff estimates using soil moisture proxies. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Appl. Earth Observ. Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2031227
- Chung, W.H., Wang, I.T., and Wang, R.Y. (2010). Theorybased SCS-CN method and its applications. J. Hydrol. Eng. Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 1045-1058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000281
- D'Asaro, F., and Grillone, G. (2012). Empirical investigation of curve number method parameters in the Mediterranean area. J. Hydrol. Eng. Vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 1141-1152. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000570
- Ebrahimian, M., Nuruddin, A.A.B., Soom, M.A B.M., Sood, A.M., and Neng, L.J. (2012). Runoff estimation in steep slope watershed with standard and slopeadjusted curve number methods. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 1191-1202.
- Hawkins, R.H., Hjelmfelt, A.T., and Zevenbergen, A.W. (1985). Runoff probability, storm depth, and curve numbers. J. Irri. Drain. Eng. Vol. 111, No. 4, pp. 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:4(330)
- Hawkins, R.H., Ward, T.J., Woodward, D.E., and Van Mullem, J.A. (2009). Curve number hydrology-state of practice. The ASCE/EWRI, Curve Number Hydrology Task Committee.
- Kim, N.W., and Lee, J. (2008). Temporally weighted average curve number method for daily runoff simulation. Hydrol. Process. Vol. 22, No. 25, pp. 4936-4948. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7116
- Kim, N.W., Lee, J.W., Lee, J., and Lee, J.E. (2010). SWAT application to estimate design runoff curve number for South Korean conditions. Hydrol. Process. Vol. 24, No. 15, pp. 2156-2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7638
- Marquardt, D.W. (1963). An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters." J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1137/0111030
- McCormick, B.C., and Eshleman, K.N. (2011). Assessing hydrologic change in surface-mined watersheds using the curve number method. J. Hydrol. Eng. Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 575-584.
- Mishra, S.K., and Singh, V.P. (1999). Another look at SCSCN method. J. Hydrol. Eng. Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(257)
- Mishra, S.K., and Singh, V.P. (2003). Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology. Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, The Netherlands, ISBN 1-4020-1132-6.
- Mishra, S.K., Singh, V.P., Sansalone, J.J., and Aravamuthan, V. (2003). A modified SCS-CN method: characterization and testing. Water Resour. Manage. Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 37-68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023099005944
- Mishra, S.K., Jain, M.K., and Singh, V.P. (2004). Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture.Water Resour. Manage. Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-004-8765-1
- Mishra, S.K., Sahu, R.K., Eldho, T.I., and Jain, M.K. (2006). An improved Ia-S relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Water Resour. Manage. Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 643-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-9000-4
- Moriasi, D.N., Arnold, J.G., Van Liew, M.W., Binger, R.L., Harmel, R.D., and Veith, T.L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transac. of the ASABE Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 885-900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
- Ponce, V.M. (1989). Engineering Hydrology, Principles and Practices. San Diego State University, 508 San Diego.
- Ponce, V.M., and Hawkins, R.H. (1996). Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? J. Hydrol. Eng. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11)
- Ritter, A., and Muoz-Carpena, R. (2013). Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. J. Hydrol. Vol. 480, pp. 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004
- Schneider, L.E., and McCuen, R.H. (2005). Statistical guidelines for curve number generation. J. Irrig. Drain Eng. Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:3(282)
- Shi, Z.H., Chen, L.D., Fang, N.F., Qin, D.F., and Cai, C.F. (2009). Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall-runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China. Catena, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.006
- Soulis, K.X., Valiantzas, J.D., Dercas, N., and Londra, P.A. (2009). Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 605-615. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-605-2009
- Soulis, K.X., and Valiantzas, J.D. (2012). SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds-the two-CN system approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 1001-1015. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1001-2012
- Stewart, D., Canfield, E., and Hawkins, R.H. (2012). Curve number determination methods and uncertainty in hydrologic soil groups from semiarid watershed data. J. Hydrol. Eng. Vol. 17, No. 11, pp. 1180-1187. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000452
- Tedela, N.H., McCutcheon, S.C., Rasmussen, T.C., Hawkins, R.H., Swank, W.T., Campbell, J.L., Adams, M.B., Jackson, C.R., and Tollner, E.W. (2012). Runoff curve number for 10 small forested watersheds in the mountains of the Eastern United States. J. Hydrol. Eng. Vol. 17, No. 11, pp. 1188-1198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000436
- USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDANRCS) (2004a). National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 Hydrology, Chapter 9: Hydrologic soil-cover complexes, Washington DC.
- USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDANRCS) (2004b). National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 Hydrology, Chapter 10: Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall, Washington DC.
- Van Liew, M., Veith, T., Bosch, D., and Arnold, J. (2007). Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: comparison on USDA agricultural research service watersheds. J. Hydrol. Eng. Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(173)
- Woodward, D.E., Hawkins, R.H., Jiang, R., Hjelmfelt, A.T., van Mullem, J.A., and Quan, Q.D. (2003). Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio. World Water & Environ. Resour. Congress, June 23-26, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, pp. 1-10.
- Yuan, Y., Nie, W., McCutcheon, S.C., and Taguas, E.V. (2014). Initial abstraction and curve numbers for semiarid watersheds in southeastern Arizona. Hydrol. Process. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 774-783. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9592