The Journal of the Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회논문지)

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pathos of S. Eisenstein's Film Form

에이젠쉬테인 영화형식의 파토스

  • Received : 2015.03.02
  • Accepted : 2015.03.24
  • Published : 2015.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Sergei Eisenstein explains pathos as the basic principles of artistic creation in "The Structure of the Film" written in 1939. The definition of pathos is embodied as effect to leap the audience in ecstasy. Pathos aiming at qualitative configuration of the audience's emotions is film form and the core of cinematic expression as important as montage. Eisenstein as one of the greatest film directors sought to theorize cinematic art. He wanted to fuse the creative and theory of film through principles such as the collision montage, intellectual image, and construction of pathos. This study explores the background of the discussion that Eisenstein going beyond the status as an artist wanted to experiment with montage to lead the change in audience and build pathos effect in the extended. This article examines the meaning of pathos in works of art he explained. It should also be understood the construction of pathos for changing the emotion of the audience through the example of the film he analyzed.

에이젠쉬테인은 1939년에 쓴 "영화의 구조The Structure of the Film"에서 파토스(pathos)를 예술 창작의 기본 원리로 설명한다. 그의 페이소스 또는 파토스는 관객을 엑스타시(ecstasy)로 이끄는 효과로 정의된다. 관객의 감정을 질적으로 변화시키는 것을 목표로 하는 파토스 구성은 에이젠쉬테인의 몽타주와 동일선상의 영화형식이며, 영화 표현의 핵심이다. 이 연구는 에이젠쉬테인이 예술가로서의 지위에 머물지 않고, 관객의 변화를 이끌기 위해 몽타주를 실험하고 그 연장에서 파토스 효과를 구축하고자 했던 논의의 배경을 살펴보았다. 에이젠쉬테인이 설명하는 예술작품에서의 파토스적 의미를 고찰하고, 관객의 감정을 변화시키기 위한 목적의 파토스 구성을 그가 분석한 영화의 사례를 통해 살펴보았다. 위대한 영화감독 가운데 하나인 에이젠쉬테인은 영화예술의 이론화를 추구하면서, 충돌 몽타주, 지적 이미지론, 파토스 구성 등의 원리를 통해 영화의 창작과 이론을 융합하고자 했던 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 임석진 외, 철학사전편찬위원회 엮음, 철학사전, 중원문화, 2012.
  2. 한국문학평론가협회 엮음, 문학비평용어사전 상.하, 국학자료원, 2006.
  3. 한용환, 소설학 사전, 문예출판사, 1999.
  4. Sergei Eisenstein, "The Structure of the Film,"Film form: essays in film theory, trans Jay Leyda, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp.174-176, 1977.
  5. Sergei Eisenstein, "The Structure of the Film,"Film form: essays in film theory, trans Jay Leyda, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, p.176, 1977.
  6. Sergei Eisenstein, "The Structure of the Film,"Film form: essays in film theory, trans Jay Leyda, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, p.166, 1977.
  7. Sergei Eisenstein, "The Structure of the Film,"Film form: essays in film theory, trans Jay Leyda, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, p.167, 1977.
  8. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.38, 1987.
  9. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.165, 1987.
  10. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, pp.169-170. 1987.
  11. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.174, 1987.
  12. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.183, 1987.
  13. Sergei Eisenstein, "On the Structure of Things," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.10, 1987.
  14. Sergei Eisenstein, "On the Structure of Things," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.27. 1987.
  15. Sergei Eisenstein, "On the Structure of Things," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.28, 1987.
  16. Sergei Eisenstein, "On the Structure of Things," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.31, 1987.
  17. Sergei Eisenstein, "On the Structure of Things," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.35, 1987.
  18. Sergei Eisenstein, "The Structure of the Film," Film form: essays in film theory, trans Jay Leyda, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp.172-173, 1977.
  19. Sergei Eisenstein, "On the Structure of Things," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, pp.35-36, 1987. 이정하, "작품의 구조에 대하여", 몽타쥬이론, 예건사, p.421, 1990에서 재인용.
  20. Sergei Eisenstein, "On the Structure of Things," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, pp.36-37. 1987.
  21. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, pp.59-199, 1987.
  22. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, pp.38-59. 1987.
  23. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.52. 1987.
  24. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.39. 1987.
  25. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, pp.53-54. 1987.
  26. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.59. 1987.
  27. 김용수, 영화에서의 몽타주 이론, 열화당, p.182, 1996.
  28. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.55, 1987.
  29. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.44, 1987.
  30. Sergei Eisenstein, "Pathos," Nonindifferent Nature, trans Herbert Marshall, Cambridge University Press, p.51, 1987.