Computers and Concrete

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical simulation of hollow steel profiles for lightweight concrete sandwich panels

  • Brunesi, E. (ROSE Programme, UME School, IUSS Pavia, Institute for Advanced Study Via Ferrata 1) ;
  • Nascimbene, R. (EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering Via Ferrata 1) ;
  • Deyanova, M. (EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering Via Ferrata 1) ;
  • Pagani, C. (B.S.Italia, Styl-Comp group Via Stezzano 16) ;
  • Zambelli, S. (B.S.Italia, Styl-Comp group Via Stezzano 16)
  • Received : 2014.10.21
  • Accepted : 2015.04.20
  • Published : 2015.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The focus of the present study is to investigate both local and global behaviour of a precast concrete sandwich panel. The selected prototype consists of two reinforced concrete layers coupled by a system of cold-drawn steel profiles and one intermediate layer of insulating material. High-definition nonlinear finite element (FE) models, based on 3D brick and 2D interface elements, are used to assess the capacity of this technology under shear, tension and compression. Geometrical nonlinearities are accounted via large displacement-large strain formulation, whilst material nonlinearities are included, in the series of simulations, by means of Von Mises yielding criterion for steel elements and a classical total strain crack model for concrete; a bond-slip constitutive law is additionally adopted to reproduce steel profile-concrete layer interaction. First, constitutive models are calibrated on the basis of preliminary pull and pull-out tests for steel and concrete, respectively. Geometrically and materially nonlinear FE simulations are performed, in compliance with experimental tests, to validate the proposed modeling approach and characterize shear, compressive and tensile response of this system, in terms of global capacity curves and local stress/strain distributions. Based on these experimental and numerical data, the structural performance is then quantified under various loading conditions, aimed to reproduce the behaviour of this solution during production, transport, construction and service conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Adalier, K. and Aydingun, O. (2001), "Structural engineering aspects of the June 27, 1998 Adana-Ceyhan (Turkey) earthquake", Eng. Struct., 23(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00046-8
  2. Architectural Precast Concrete (2007), Chicago, Illinois: PCI Architectural Precast Concrete Manual Committee. (Vols. 3rd Edition, First Printing).
  3. Belleri, A., Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R., Pagani, M. and Riva, P. (2014), "Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory", J. Peform. Constr. Fac.-ASCE, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000617.
  4. Biscaia, H.C., Chastre, C. and Silva, M.A.G. (2013), "A smeared crack analysis of reinforced concrete T-beams strengthened with GFRP composites", Eng. Struct., 56, 1346-1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.010
  5. Bournas, D.A., Negro, P. and Taucer, F.F. (2014), "Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in Northern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 12(5), 2383-2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9466-z
  6. Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R., Bolognini, D. and Bellotti, D. (2015a), "Experimental investigation of the cyclic response of reinforced precast concrete framed structures", PCI. J., 60(2), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012015.57.79
  7. Brunesi, E., Bolognini, D. and Nascimbene, R. (2015b), "Evaluation of the shear capacity of precast-prestressed hollow core slabs: numerical and experimental comparisons", Mater. Struct., 48(5), 1503-1521. DOI: 10.1617/s11527-014-0250-6.
  8. Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R., Pagani, M. and Beilic, D. (2014a), "Seismic performance of storage steel tanks during the May 2012 Emilia, Italy, earthquakes", J. Perform. Constr. Fac.-ASCE, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000628.
  9. Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R. and Rassati, G.A. (2014b), "Response of partially-restrained bolted beam-to-column connections under cyclic loads", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 97, 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.014
  10. Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R. and Rassati, G.A. (2015c), "Seismic response of MRFs with partially-restrained bolted beam-to-column connections through FE analyses", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 107, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.12.022
  11. Brunesi, E. and Nascimbene, R. (2014), "Extreme response of reinforced concrete buildings through fiber force-based finite element analysis", Eng. Struct., 69, 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.020
  12. Casarotti, C. and Pinho, R. (2006), "Seismic response of continuous span bridges through fiber-based finite element analysis", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 5(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-006-0631-0
  13. Charney, F.A. and Harris, J.R. (1989), The Effect of Architectural Precast Concrete Cladding on the Lateral Response of Mutlistory Buildings, Chicago, Illinois: PCI.
  14. Dorr, K. (1980), Ein Beitrag yur Berechnung von Stahlbetonscheiben unter besondere Berucksichtigung des Verbundverhaltens. PhD Thesis, University of Darmstadt.
  15. Ghosh, S.K. and Cleland, N. (2012), "Observations from the February 27, 2010, earthquake in Chile", PCI. J., 57(1), 52-75. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012012.52.75
  16. Girao Coelho A.M. (2013), "Rotation capacity of partial strength steel joints with three-dimensional finite element approach", Comput. Struct., 116, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.10.024
  17. Henry, R.M. and Roll, F. (1986), "Cladding-Frame Interaction", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE., 112(4), 815-834. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:4(815)
  18. Hordijk D.A. (1991), Local Approach to Fatigue of Concrete. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.
  19. Hung, C.C. and El-Tawil, S. (2010), "Hybrid rotating/fixed-crack model for high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites", ACI. Mater. J., 107(6), 569-577.
  20. Hung, C.C. and Li, S.H. (2013), "Three-dimensional model for analysis of high performance fiber reinforced cement-based composites", Compos. B. Eng., 45(1), 1441-1447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.004
  21. Hung, C.C., Su, Y.F. and Yu, K.H. (2013), "Modeling the shear hysteretic response for high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites", Constr. Build. Mater., 41, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.010
  22. Hunt, J.P. and Stojadinovic, B. (2010), Seismic Performance Assessment and Probabilistic Repair Cost Analysis of Precast Concrete Cladding Systems for Multistory Buildings. PEER.
  23. Le Nguyen, K., Brun, M., Limam, A., Ferrier, E. and Michel, L. (2014), "Pushover experiment and numerical analyses on CFRP-retrofit concrete shear walls with different aspect ratios", Compos. Struct., 113, 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.026
  24. Liberatore, L., Sorrentino, L., Liberatore, D. and Decanini, L.D. (2013), "Failure of industrial structures induced by the Emilia (Italy) 2012 earthquakes", Eng. Fail. Anal., 34, 629-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.009
  25. Magliulo, G., Ercolino, M., Petrone, C., Coppola, O. and Manfredi, G. (2014), "Emilia Earthquake: the Seismic Performance of Precast RC Buildings", Earthq.Spectra., 30(2), 891-912. https://doi.org/10.1193/091012EQS285M
  26. Medina, R.A., Sankaranarayanan, R. and Kingston, K.M. (2006), "Floor response spectra for light components mounted on regular moment-resisting frame structures", Eng. Struct., 28(14), 1927-1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.022
  27. MIDAS (2010) Nonlinear and Detail FE Analysis System for Civil Structures-FEA Analysis and Algorithm Manual (www.cspfea.net).
  28. Mosqueda, G., Retamales, R., Filiatrault, A. and Reinhorn, A. (2009), "Testing facility for experimental evaluation of non-structural components under full-scale floor motions", Struct. Des. Tall. Spec., 18(4), 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.441
  29. Mpampatsikos, V., Nascimbene, R. and Petrini, L. (2008), "A critical review of the R.C. frame existing building assessment procedure according to Eurocode 8 and Italian Seismic Code", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(1), 52-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801925020
  30. Pecce, M., Ceroni, F., Bibbo, F.A. and De Angelis, A. (2014), "Behaviour of RC buildings with large lightly reinforced walls along the perimeter", Eng. Struct., 73, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.038
  31. Petrone, C., Magliulo, G. and Manfredi, G. (2014), "Shake table tests for the seismic assessment of hollow brick internal partitions", Eng. Struct., 72, 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.044
  32. Retamales, R., Mosqueda, G., Filiatrault, A. and Reinhorn, A. (2011), "Testing protocol for experimental seismic qualification of distributed nonstructural systems", Earthq.Spectra., 27(3), 835-856. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3609868
  33. Retamales, R., Davies, R., Mosqueda, G. and Filiatrault, A. (2013), "Experimental seismic fragility of cold-formed steel framed gypsum partition walls", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 139(2), 1285-1293. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000657
  34. Sezen, H. and Whittaker, A.S. (2006), "Seismic performance of industrial facilities affected by the 1999 Turkey earthquake", J. Perform. Constr. Fac.-ASCE, 20(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:1(28)
  35. Spacone, E., Filippou, F.C. and Taucer, F.F. (1996), "Fibre beam-column model for non-linear analysis of RC frames: part I. Formulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 25, 711-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199607)25:7<711::AID-EQE576>3.0.CO;2-9
  36. Taghavi, S. and Miranda, E. (2003), Response Assessment of Nonstructural Building Elements. University of california. Berkeley: PEER.
  37. Thorenfeldt, E., Tomaszewicz, A. and Jensen, J.J. (1987), "Mechanical properties of high-strength concrete and applications in design", In: Proceedings symposium utilization of high-strength concrete, Trondheim, Norway, Tapir.
  38. Toniolo, G. and Colombo, A. (2012), "Precast concrete structures: the lessons learned from the L'Aquila earthquake", Struct. Concr., 13(2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201100052
  39. Vecchio, F.J. and Collins, M.P. (1986), "The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear", ACI. Struct. J., 83(2), 219-231.
  40. Vecchio, F.J. and Collins, M.P. (1993), "Compression response of cracked reinforced concrete", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 119(12), 3590-3610. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3590)
  41. Venini, P. and Nascimbene, R. (2003), "A new fixed-point algorithm for hardening plasticity based on non-linear mixed variational inequalities", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 57(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.672
  42. Villaverde, R. (2006), "Simple method to estimate the seismic nonlinear response of nonstructural components in buildings", Eng. Struct., 28(8), 1209-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.016
  43. Wanitkorkul, A. and Filiatrault, A. (2008), "Influence of passive supplemental damping systems on structural and nonstructural seismic fragilities of a steel building", Eng. Struct., 30(3), 675-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.013

Cited by

  1. Bond-slip responses of stainless reinforcing bars in grouted ducts vol.141, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.049
  2. Mechanical model for seismic response assessment of lightly reinforced concrete walls vol.11, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.461
  3. Numerical web-shear strength assessment of precast prestressed hollow core slab units vol.102, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.013
  4. Experimental and numerical investigation of the seismic response of precast wall connections vol.15, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0166-y
  5. Application of dynamic analysis and modelling of structural concrete insulated panels (SCIP) for energy efficient buildings in seismic prone areas vol.128, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.049
  6. Quasi-static cyclic tests of precast bridge columns with different connection details for high seismic zones vol.158, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.035
  7. Seismic analysis of high-rise mega-braced frame-core buildings vol.115, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.019
  8. Effects of structural openings on the buckling strength of cylindrical shells pp.2048-4011, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218764625
  9. Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Precast Wall Connections: Experimental Observations and Numerical Modeling pp.1559-808X, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1469440
  10. Push-out test on the web opening shear connector for a slim-floor steel beam: Experimental and analytical study vol.163, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.047
  11. Numerical simulation of seismic tests on precast concrete structures with various arrangements of cladding panels vol.23, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.23.2.081
  12. Structural Behavior of Composite Panels Made of Lightly Profiled Steel Skins and Lightweight Concrete under Concentric and Eccentric Loads vol.145, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002380
  13. Seismic Performance of Precast Bridge Columns with Socket and Pocket Connections Based on Quasi-Static Cyclic Tests: Experimental and Numerical Study vol.24, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001463
  14. Damage mechanics-based modeling approaches for cyclic analysis of precast concrete structures: A comparative study vol.29, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789519900783
  15. Seismic behaviors of precast assembled bridge columns connected with prestressed threaded steel bar: Experimental test and hysteretic model vol.23, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220903988
  16. Mechanical performance test and finite element analysis of prefabricated utility tunnel L‐shaped joint vol.29, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1748
  17. Cyclic tests of steel tee energy absorbers for precast exterior wall panels in steel building frames vol.242, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112561