Computers and Concrete

  • 제15권6호
  • /
  • Pages.921-933
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1598-8198(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-818X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Earthquake performance investigation of R/C residential buildings in Turkey

  • Korkmaz, Kasim Armagan (Istanbul Technical University, Civil Engineering Department) ;
  • Demir, Fuat (Suleyman Demirel University, Civil Engineering Department) ;
  • Yenice, Tugce (Suleyman Demirel University, Civil Engineering Department)
  • 투고 : 2014.09.02
  • 심사 : 2015.03.04
  • 발행 : 2015.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The aim of this study is to determine the earthquake performances of reinforced concrete (R/C) residential buildings in Turkey and to analyze the parameters that affect the performance. The performance of Turkish residential buildings, determined by their levels of damage, directly relates to their structural systems. Damage parameters observed from previous earthquakes define structural parameters selected to be used in the present study. Five different types of frame R/C buildings were modeled. For the analysis, the model buildings vary according to the number of stories, column sizes, and reinforcement and concrete strength parameters. The analyses consider gravity forces and earthquake loads through 1975 and 2007 Turkish design codes. In a total of 720 different R/C buildings were investigated for the analysis to obtain capacity curves. A performance evaluation was employed by considering the Turkish design code (TDC-2007). The current study ignores irregularities such as soft stories or short columns. The study's analysis considers a comparison of the parameters' influence on the structural performance of the model buildings.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American ACI 318-95 Code (1996), Building code requirements for structural concrete: ACI manual of concrete practice part 3: Use of concrete in buildings-design, specifications, and related topics. Michigan: American Concrete Institute.
  2. Arslan, M.H. (2010), "An evaluation of effective design parameters on earthquake performance of RC buildings using neural networks", Eng. Struct., 32(7), 1888-1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.010
  3. Arslan, M.H., Yuksel, I. and Kaltakci, M.Y. (2010), "An investigation on global ductility of strengthened 2 story 2 bay RC frames", Struct. Build. J., 163(3), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2010.163.3.177
  4. ATC (Applied Technology Council) (1996), Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Report ATC-40, Redwood City (CA).
  5. Bal, I.E., Crowly, H., Pinho R. and Gulay F.G. (2007), Structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock in northern Marmara region for loss assesment applications, IUSS Press.
  6. Bruneau, M. (2002), "Building damage from the Marmara, Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999", J. Seismol., 6(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020035425531
  7. Dogangun, A. (2004), "Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingol earthquake in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 26(6), 841-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.005
  8. Elnashai, A.S. (2000), "Analysis of the damage potential of the Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake of 17 August 1999", Eng. Struct., 22(7), 746-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00104-2
  9. Eurocode-8 (2003), Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1, Pr-EN 1998-1, Final Draft, Brussels, European Committee for Standardization.
  10. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1996), "The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 25(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::AID-EQE534>3.0.CO;2-V
  11. FEMA (2000), Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 356, Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Washington DC, USA.
  12. FEMA (1996), Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-273, NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Washington DC, USA.
  13. Garcia, J.R. and Miranda, E. (2010), "Probabilistic estimation of residual drift demands for seismic assessment of multi-story framed buildings", Eng. Struct., 32(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.010
  14. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (2000), "Estimation of seismic drift demands for frame structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 29(9), 1287-1305. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1287::AID-EQE971>3.0.CO;2-B
  15. Inel, M., Ozmen, H.B. and Bilgin, H. (2008), "Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 30(2), 412-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.012
  16. Irtem, E., Turker, K. and Hagul, U. (2007), "Causes of collapse and damage to low-rise RC buildings in recent Turkish earthquakes", J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 21(5), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:5(351)
  17. Korkmaz, K.A. (2009), "Earthquake disaster risk assessment and evaluation for Turkey", Environ. Geol., 57(2), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1439-1
  18. Miranda, E. (2005), Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, July 18-20.
  19. Miranda, E. and Reyes, C.J. (2002), "Approximate lateral drift demands in multistory buildings with nonuniform stiffness", J.Struct. Eng., 128(7), 840-849. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:7(840)
  20. Otani, S., Hiraishi, H., Midorikawa, M. and Teshigawara, M. (2000), New seismic design provisions in Japan, Proceeding of Uzumeri symposium, ACI Annual Convention.
  21. Priestley, M.J.N. and Kowalsky, M.J. (1998), "Aspects of drift and ductility capacity of rectangular cantilever structural walls", Bull. NZ. Nat. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 31(2), 73-85.
  22. Paulay, T. (1993), The fourth Malnet-Milne lecture simplicity and confidence in seismic design, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  23. Paulay, T. (2002), "The displacement capacity of reinforced concrete coupled walls", Eng. Struct., 24(9), 1165-1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00050-0
  24. Paulay, T. (2002), "An estimation of displacement limits for ductile systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31(3), 583-599. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.157
  25. Saiidi, M. and Sozen, M.A. (1981), "Simple non-linear seismic analysis of RC structures", J. Struct. D., 107(5), 937-953.
  26. Sezen, H., Whittaker, A.S., Elwood, K.J. and Mosalam, K.W. (2003), "Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and the seismic design and construction practice in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 25(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9
  27. Shakeri, K., Shayanfar, M.A. and Kabeyasawa, T. (2010), "A story shear-based adaptive pushover procedure for estimating seismic demands of buildings", Eng. Struct., 32(1), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.004
  28. TDC-1975, Turkish Design Code, Regulations on structures constructed in disaster regions, Ankara: Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, 1975 [in Turkish].
  29. TDC-2007, Turkish Design Code, Regulations on structures constructed in disaster regions, Ankara: Ministry of Public Works and Settlement [in Turkish].
  30. Turkish Standard (2000), TS500: Restrictions for design and construction of R/C structures [in Turkish]. Ankara, The Minister of Public Works and Settlement.
  31. UBC (1997), Uniform Building Code International Council of Building Officials (ICBO).
  32. Villaverde, R. (2007), "Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity of building structures: state of the art", J. Struct. Eng., 133(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(57)
  33. Vision 2000 (1995), Performance based seismic engineering of buildings. Conceptual framework, vols. I-II. Sacramento (CA): Structural Engineers Association of California; 1995 CEN.
  34. Yakut, A., Gulkan, P., Bakir, S.B. and Yilmaz, M.T. (2005), "Re-examination of damage distribution in Adapazari: structural consideration", Eng. Struct., 27(7), 990-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.001
  35. Yenice, T. (2010), Investigation of Seismic Safety and The Effecting Parameters for Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Ms. Thesis Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
  36. Yuksel, I. and Polat, Z. (2005), "Yield state investigation of reinforced concrete frames from a new point of view", Eng. Struct., 27(1),119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.09.006

피인용 문헌

  1. Seismic performance of RC buildings subjected to past earthquakes in Turkey vol.11, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.483
  2. Shear stress indicator to predict seismic performance of residential RC buildings vol.19, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.283
  3. The investigation of seismic performance of existing RC buildings with and without infill walls vol.22, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.5.439
  4. Evaluation of Structural Properties of Existing Turkish RC Building Stock vol.43, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0207-z