Acknowledgement
이 논문은 2013년도 충북대학교 학술연구지원사업의 연구비 지원에 의하여 연구되었음.
References
- 강동우 (2013). 형사법상 합리적 의심에 관한 연구. 홍익법학, 14(1), 419-443.
- 김성민 (2006). 증거능력과 증명력. 고시연구, 33(4), 455-468.
- 박미숙, 이정민, 황지태, 김광준, 추형관, 임유석 (2008). 형사정책과 사법개혁에 관한 조사.연구 및 평가(II): 국민참여재판에 대한 참관 및 조사연구. 형사정책연구원 연구총서, 17-492.
- 석동현, 김미진 (2013). 평결 판단에서 웰스효과의 확인과 평결 오류 위험성 지각의 영향. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 19(2), 159-178.
- 황일호 (2010). 국민참여재판의 배심원에 대한 실증적 연구. 한양법학, 29, 513-540.
- Cohen, N. P. (2000). The Timing of Jury Instructions. Tennessee Law Review, 67, 681-699.
- Dane, F. C. (1985). In search of reasonable doubt. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 141-158.
- Dhami, M. K. (2008). On measuring quantitative interpretations of reasonable doubt. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 353-363.
- Ellsworth, P. C. (1989). Are twelve heads better than one?. Law and Contemporary Problems, 205-224.
- Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?. Law and Human Behavior, 1(2), 163.
- Federal Judicial Center. (1987). Pattern criminal jury instructions. Washington, DC: Author.
- ForsterLee, L., & Horowitz, I. A. (2003). The effects of jury-aid innovations on juror performance in complex civil trials. Judicature, 86(4), 184-190.
- ForsterLee, L., Horowitz, I. A., & Bourgeois, M. J. (1993). Juror competence in civil trials: Effects of preinstruction and evidence technicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 14.
- Fried, M., Kaplan, K. J., & Klein, K. W. (1975). Juror selection: An analysis of voir dire. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The juror system in America: A critical overview (pp.58-64). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Gigerenzer & Todd (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Evolution and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Goldberg, J. C. (1981). Memory, Magic, and Myth: The Timing of Jury Instructions. Oregon Law Review, 59(4), 451-454.
- Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 13(4), 409.
- In re Winship (1970). 397 U.S. 358.
- Ingriselli, E. (2015). Mitigating Jurors' Racial Biases: The Effects of Content and Timing of Jury Instructions. Yale LJ, 124, 1690-1825.
- Kagehiro, D. K., & Stanton, W. C. (1985). Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 159-178.
- Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1979). On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1877.
- MacCoun, R. J. (1984). Modeling the impact of extralegal bias and defined standards of proof on the decisions of mock jurors and juries. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 700B.
- MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21-33.
- MacCoun, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The basis of citizen's perceptions of the criminal jury. Law and Human Behavior, 12(3), 333-352.
- McBride, R. L. (1969). The art of instruction the jury. Cincinnate, Ohio: W. H. Anderson.
- McCauliff, C. M. A. (1982). Burdens of proof: Degrees of belief, quanta of evidence, or constitutional guarantees? Vanderbilt Law Review, 35, 1293-1335.
- McCullough v. State (1983). 657 P. 2d 1157.
- Nagel, S. S. (1979). Bringing the values of jurors in line with the law. Judicature, 63, 189-195.
- Nagel, S., Lamm, D., & Neef, M. (1981). Decision theory and juror decision-making. Perspectives in law and psychology: The trial process, 2, 353-386.
- Newman, J. (1993). Beyond reasonable doubt. New York University Law Review, 68, 979-1002.
- Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534-552.
- Simon, D. (2004). A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. The University of Chicago Law Review, 511-586.
- Simon, R. J. (1969). Judges' translations of burdens of proof into statements of probability. Trial Lawyer's Guide, 13, 103-114.
- Simon, R. J., & Mahan, L. (1971). Quantifying burdens of proof. A view from the bench, the jury, and the classroom. Law and Society Review, 319-330.
- Smith, V. L. (1991). Impact of pretrial instruction on jurors' information processing and decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 220-228.
- Stoffelmayr, E., & Diamond, S. S. (2000). The Conflict between Precision and Flexibility in Explaining "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt". Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6, 769-787.
- Sullivan v. Louisiana (1993). 508 U.S. 275.
- Thomson, W. C., Cowan, C. L., Ellsworth, P. C., & Harrington, J. C. (1984). Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness: The translation of attitudes into verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 95-113.
- Tribe, L. H. (1971). Trial by mathematics: Precision and ritual in the legal process. Harvard Law Review, 84, 1329-1393.
- United States v. Fatico (1979). 458 F. Supp. 388 (E.D.N.Y. 1978), aff'd, 603 F.2d 1053.
- Wells, G. L. (1992). Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 739-752.