DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reaction of Cauliflower Genotypes to Black Rot of Crucifers

  • Received : 2015.01.28
  • Accepted : 2015.04.13
  • Published : 2015.06.01

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate six cauliflower genotypes regarding their resistance to black rot and their production performance. To do so, it was conducted two field experiments in Ipameri, $Goi\acute{a}s$, Brazil, in 2012 and 2013. It was used a randomized block design, with four replications (total of 24 plots). Each plot consisted of three planting lines 2.5 m long (six plants/line), spaced 1.0 m apart, for a total area of $7.5m^2$. Evaluations of black rot severity were performed at 45 days after transplanting, this is, 75 days after sowing (DAS), and yield evaluations at 90 to 105 DAS. The Verona 184 genotype was the most resistant to black rot, showing 1.87 and 2.25% of leaf area covered by black rot symptom (LACBRS) in 2012 and 2013. However, it was not among the most productive materials. The yield of the genotypes varied between 15.14 and 25.83 t/ha in both years, Lisvera F1 (21.78 and 24.60 t/ha) and Cindy (19.95 and 23.56 t/ha) being the most productive. However, Lisvera F1 showed 6.37 and 9.37% of LACBRS and Cindy showed 14.25 and 14.87% of LACBRS in 2012 and 2013, being both considered as tolerant to black rot.

Keywords

References

  1. Annicchiarico P. 2002. Genotype$\times$environment interaction: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. Rome: FAO.
  2. Camargo, M. S., Mello, S. C., Foltran, D. E. and Carmello, Q. A. C. 2008. Produtividade e podridao parda em couve-flor de inverno influenciadas pelo nitrogenio e boro. Bragantia 67:371-375. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052008000200012
  3. Castoldi, R., Charlo, H. C. O., Vargas, P. F. and Braz, L. T. 2009. Crescimento, acumulo de nutrientes e produtividade da cultura da couve-flor. Hortic Bras. 27:438-446. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362009000400007
  4. Ferreira, D. F. 2011. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Cienc. Agrotec. 35:1039-1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001
  5. Godoy, M. C. and Cardoso, A. I. I. 2005. Produtividade da couveflor em funcao da idade de transplantio das mudas produzidas e tamanhos de celulas na bandeja. Hortic Bras. 23:837-840. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362005000300029
  6. Henz, G. P. and Melo, P. E. 1994. Resistencia de cultivares de repolho a Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 29:411-415.
  7. Hortbrasil. 2014. Normas de classificacao - couve-flor. Campinas, 2011. Available at: . Acess on: 21 June 2014.
  8. Jensen, B. D., Massomo, S. M. S., Swai, I. S., Hockenhull, J. and Andersen, S. B. 2005. Field evaluation for resistance to the black rot pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in cabbage (Brassica oleracea). Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 113:297-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-005-2799-y
  9. Jiang, H., Song, W., Yang, A. L. X. and Sun, D. 2011. Identification of genes differentially expressed in cauliflower associated with resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Mol. Biol. Rep. 38:621-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-010-0148-5
  10. Maringoni, A. C. 2005. Doencas das cruciferas. In: Kimati, H., Amorim, L., Rezende, J. A. M. and Bergamin Filho, A. Manual de fitopatologia. Sao Paulo: Agronomica Ceres, pp. 285-292.
  11. May, A., Tivelli, S. W., Vargas, P. F., Samra, A. G., Sacconi, L. V. and Pinheiro, M. Q. 2007. A cultura da couve-flor. Boletim Tecnico. Campinas: Instituto Agronomico de Campinas.
  12. Monteiro, B. C. B. A., Charlo, H. C. O. and Braz, L. T. 2010. Desempenho de híbridos de couve-flor de verao em Jaboticabal. Hortic Bras. 28:115-119. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362010000100022
  13. Morais Junior, O., Cardoso, A. F., Leao, E. F. and Peixoto, N. 2012. Desempenho de cultivares de couve-flor de verao em Ipameri. Cienc. Rural. 42:1923-1928. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012005000085
  14. Peruch, L. A. M., Michereff, S. J. and Araujo, I. B. 2006. Levantamento da intensidade da alternariose e da podridao negra em cultivos organicos de brassicas em Pernambuco e Santa Catarina. Hortic. Bras. 24:464-469. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362006000400014
  15. Rodrigues, V. J. L. B., Michereff, S. J., Aguiar Filho, M. R., Silva, L. G. C. and Biondi, C. M. 2004. Epidemiologia comparativa da alternariose em cultivares de brassicas sob cultivo convencional e organico. Summa Phytopathol. 30:226-233.
  16. Santos, L. A., Bandeira, D. A., Silva, J. P., Silveira, E. B., Gomes, A. M. A. and Mariano, R. L. R. 2008. Caracterizacao de isolados de Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris de sistemas de producao orgânico e reacao de brassicas a podridao-negra. Hortic Bras. 26:486-491. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362008000400012
  17. Seabra Junior, S., Lalla, J. G., Goto, R., Maringoni, A. C., Villas Boas, R. L., Rouws, J. R. C. and Oriani, E. E. 2013. Suscetibilidade a podridao negra e produtividade de brocolis em funcao de doses de nitrogenio e potassio. Hortic Bras. 31:426-431. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362013000300013
  18. Seabra Junior, S., Paixao, G. S., Maringoni, A. C., Goto, R. and Camara, R. C. 2008. Reacao de hibridos de brocolis 'tipo cabeca unica' a podridao negra. Summa Phytopathol. 34:76-77. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-54052008000100016
  19. Sousa, C. S., Haber, L. L., Santana, D. G., Arruda, A. S. and Takatsu, A. 2003. Metodo de inoculacao de Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris pelo sistema radicular para avaliacao rapida de resistencia de repolho a podridao negra. Biosci. J. 19:53-56.
  20. Villeth, G. R., Reis Junior, F. B., Tonietto, A., Huergo, L., Souza, E. M., Pedrosa, F. O., Franco, O. L. and Mehta, A. 2009. Comparative proteomeanalysis of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in the interaction with the susceptible and the resistant cultivars of Brassica oleracea. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 298:260-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01728.x
  21. Zanuzo, M. R., Ribeiro, L. M., Lange, A., Machado, R. A. F. and Massaroto, J. A. 2013. Desempenho agronomico de genotipos de couve-flor nas condicoes edafoclimaticas de Sinop. Hortic. Bras. 31:332-337. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362013000200026