DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measuring the Economic Value of Restoring Hampyeong Stream Space

  • Lee, Hee-Chan (College of Hospitality and Tourism, Sejong Univ.) ;
  • Leem, Joo-Whan (College of Hospitality and Tourism, Sejong Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Kyu-Ho (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
  • Received : 2015.02.05
  • Accepted : 2015.04.08
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the spatial restoration of Hampyeong Stream and to analyze the determinants of demand for the multi-functionalities of the stream. A Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) was used to estimate the multi-functional public benefits of restored stream area, and major determinants were scrutinized by establishing a demand model. The research data was collected by conducting a survey intended for Hampyeong's local residents, resulting in 284 valid samples. In terms of determinants that affect willingness to pay (WTP), 'physical factor of waterfront area' and 'experience factor of stream space' showed a significantly positive influence on WTP. As a result of applying a double-bounded CVM, the willingness to pay for the restored Hampyeong Stream area indicated a potential contribution of 22,523 won (17,362~27,459 won, 95% confidence interval). When multiplying the number of households in Hampyeong-gun, the total annual value of Hampyeong Stream spatial restoration is approximately 302million won.

Keywords

References

  1. Alam, K.(2008) Cost-benefit analysis of restoring Buriganga River. Bangladesh Water Resources Development 24(4): 593-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620802224486
  2. Bishop, R.C. and T.A. Heberlein(1979) Measuring values of extra-market goods: Are indirect measures biased. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(5): 926-930. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180348
  3. Byen, K.O., K.D. Han, Y.J. Sung, S.H. Oh, J,E. Sang and S.H. Choi(2011) River Amenity restoration planning guide. ECORIVER21. (in Korean)
  4. Cho, H.J., J.H. Ra, H.T. Lee and J.N. Ku(2009) A study on the evaluation of wide-scale site suitability for waterfront recreation area planning. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(2): 1-13 (in Korean with English abstract)
  5. Eom, Y.S., C.Y. Kim, T.H. You and C.S. Kim(2001) Valuing intentions to visit Man Kyoung ecological river. Korea Environmental Policy and Administration Society 9(1): 81-100. (in Korean with English abstract)
  6. Fleming, M.C. and A. Cook(2008) The recreational value of Lake McKenzie, Fraser Island; An application of the travel cost method. Tourism Management 29(6): 1197-1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.022
  7. Hanemann, W.M. and B. Kanninen(1998) The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. University of California at Berkeley. Working Paper 798.
  8. Hanemann, W.M.(1984) Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(3): 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  9. Holms, T.P. J.C. Bergstrom, E. Huszar, S.B. Kask and F. Orr(2004) Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits and the scale riparian ecosystem restoration. Ecological Economics 49(1): 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.015
  10. Hong, J.Y., H.C. Lee and A.K. Kim(2014) Study about the effect of destination selection attributes on estimating the value of Cheonggae stream's public benefit functions. Korean Journal of Hospitality Administration 23(1): 219-233. (in Korean with English abstract)
  11. Kim, D.C. and I.S. Park(1999) A study on the evaluation criteria of stream naturalness for ecological environment restoration of stream corridors. Jounal of Korean Wetland Society 17(3): 123-134. (in Korean with English abstract)
  12. Kim, J.O., O.S. Kim and S.H. Kim(2004) A study on the quantified evaluation and application of stream environment. Jounal of Korean Wetland Society 6(3): 83-93. (in Korean with English abstract)
  13. Kim, S.Y., S.I. Choi and T.G. Kim(2012) Valuing Tourism Resource Using the CVM: Focusing Ara-Waterway. Korean Journal of Hospitality Administration 21(5): 207-218. (in Korean with English abstract)
  14. Koo, Y.M,. H,S, Kang and M.S. Lee(2014) An economic value for construction of ecological in Hong Cheon Area, Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Ecology 28(1): 71-79. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.1.71
  15. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements(2011) Socio-economic evaluation of river restoration project.
  16. Krinsky, I. and A. Robb(1986) On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4): 715-719. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
  17. Krutilla, J.V.(1967) Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review 57(4): 777-786.
  18. Kwak, S.J., S.H. Yoo and J.I. Chang(2006) Valuing the Han-river estuary: Using conjoint analysis. The Korean Economic Review 54(4): 141-160. (in Korean with English abstract)
  19. Kwon, O.S.(2006) Valuing recreational benefits of dam lakes Using a choice experiment approach. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 15(3): 555-574. (in Korean with English abstract)
  20. Lee, H.-C. and H.-S. Chun(1999) Valuing environmental quality change on recreational hunting in Korea: A contingent valuation analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 57(1): 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0284
  21. Lee, H.S.(2014) A study on analysis of importance weights of river-front assessment items using analytic hierarchy process: Focused on the Gyeong-An stream in Gyeonggi Province. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning 20(1): 27-36. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.1.027
  22. Leem, Y.T. and J.Y. Lee(2005)An Estimation of the value of urban ecological riverside park. The Korean Regional Development Association 17(3):95-110. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1966.tb01343.x
  23. Loomis. J., P. Kent, L. Strange, K. Fausch and A, Covich(2000) Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 33(1): 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7
  24. Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson(1989) Using Survey to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resource for the Future. Washington. D.C.
  25. Poor, P.J., K,L. Pessagno and R.W. Paul(2007) Exploring the hedonic value of ambient water quality: A local watershed-based study. Ecological Economics 60(4): 797-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.013
  26. Son, M.S., W.Y. Cho and H.S. Kim(2012) Elicitation of WTP before and after waterfront restoration -Ca-se study of Cheonggyecheon stream restoration project. Journal of the KRSA 28(2); 23-37. (in Korean with English abstract)
  27. Song, J.I., J.H. Lee and S.E.Yoon(2008) Development of stream assessment technique for restoration and management of urban stream. Journal of The Korean Society of Civil Engineers 28(3b): 283-296.(in Korean with English abstract)
  28. Weisbrod, B.(1964) Collective-consumption services of in- dividual-consumption goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 78(3): 471-477. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879478
  29. Willis, K., G. Garrod and C. Saunders(1995) Benefits of environmentally sensitive area policy in England: A contingent valuation assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 44(2): 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1995.0034
  30. Yoo, S.H. and J.S. Lee(2011) Economic valuation of the river environment improvement. Journal of Water Policy and Economy 17: 63-77. (in Korean with English abstract)
  31. Yoo, S.H., J.H. Han and S.H. Park(2009) The economic benefits from restoring the ecological integrity of the Anseong River. Journal of the KRSA 25(1): 57-73. (in Korean with English abstract)