Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal (한국실내디자인학회논문집)

Korean Institute of Interior Design (한국실내디자인학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Similarity Measurement of Interior Design Images - Comparison between Measurement based on Perceptual Judgment and Measurement through Computing the Algorithm -

실내디자인 이미지의 유사성 측정 - 관찰자 직관 기반 측정법과 알고리즘 기반 정량적 측정법의 결과 비교를 중심으로 -

  • 유호정 (연세대학교 실내건축학과) ;
  • 하미경 (연세대학교 실내건축학과)
  • Received : 2015.01.12
  • Accepted : 2015.03.06
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We live in the era of unlimited design competition. As the importance of design is increasing in all areas including marketing, each country does its best effort on design development. However, the preparation on protecting interior design rights by intellectual property laws(IPLs) has not been enough even though they occupy an important place in the design field. It is not quite easy to make a judgement on the similarity between two images having a single common factor because the factors which are composed of interior design have complicated interactive relations between them. From the IPLs point of view, designs with the similar overall appearance are decided to be similar. Objective evaluation criteria not only for designers but also for design examiners and judges are required in order to protect interior design by the IPLs. The objective of this study is the analysis of the possibility that a computer algorithm method can be useful to decide the similarity of interior design images. According to this study, it is realized that the Img2 which is one of content-based image retrieval computer programs can be utilized to measure the degree of the similarity. The simulation results of three descriptors(CEDD, FCTH, JCD) in the Img2 showed the high degree of similar patterns compared with the results of perceptual judgment by observers. In particular, it was verified that the Img2 has high availability on interior design images with a high score of similarity below 60 which are perceptually judged by observers.

Keywords

References

  1. ATTNEAVE, Fred. Dimensions of similarity. The American journal of psychology, 1950, 63.4 : 516-556 https://doi.org/10.2307/1418869
  2. Chang Chang Wu, "Repetition-based dense single-view reconstruction" IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), 2011
  3. Chatizichristofis, Savvas A.; Boutalis, Yiannis S.; LUZ, Mathias. Img(rummager): An interactive content based image retrieval system. In: Similarity Search and Applications, SISAP'09. Second International Workshop on. IEEE, 2009
  4. Datta, Rittendra; Joshi, Dhiraj; Wang, James Z. (2008), Image Retrieval: Ideas, Influences, and Trends of the New Age, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol.40, No.2
  5. David P, "Detection of Building Facades in Urban Environments," Proc. of the SPIE, Vol.6978, 2008
  6. GENTNER, Dedre; RATTERMANN, Mary Jo; FORBUS, Kenneth D. The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive psychology, 1993, 25.4: 524-575 https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1013
  7. GOLDSTONE, Robert L. The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 1994, 52.2: 125-157 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90065-5
  8. GOLDSTONE, Robert L.; GENTNER, Dedre; MEDIN, Douglas L. Relational similarity and the non-independence of features in similarity judgments, Cognitive Psychology, 1991, 23 : 222-262 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90010-L
  9. GOODMAN, Nelson. Seven strictures on similarity. In N. Goodman(Ed.), Problems and projects, New York : Bobs-Merril, 1972. 445
  10. HALFORD, Graeme S.; Wilson, W. H.; Guo, J.; Gayler, R. W.; Wiles, J.; & Stewart, J. E. M. Connectionist implications for processing capacity limitations in analogies. Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, 1994, 2: 363-415
  11. Jan Bohm, Nobert Haala, Peter Kapusy, "Automated Appearance-Based Building Detection in Terrestrial Images," In ISPRS Commission V Symposium, International Archives on Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol.34 No.5, 2002
  12. MARKMAN, Arthur B.; GENTNER, Dedre. Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 1993a, 32.4: 517-535 https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1027
  13. SMITH, Linda B.; HEISE, Diana. Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure. Advances in psychology, 1992, 93: 233-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61009-2
  14. T. Deselaers, D. Keysers, H Ney, "Features for Image retrieval: an experimental comparison," Image Retrieval, Vol.11, No.2, 2008
  15. TVERSKY, Amos., Features of similarity, Psychological Review, 1977, 84 : 327-352 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
  16. WHARTON, Charles M.; HOLYOAK, K. J.; DOWNING, P. E.; LANGE, T. E.; WICKENS, T. D.; & MELZ, E. R., Below the surface: Analogical similarity and retrieval competition in reminding. Cognitive Psychology, 1994, 26.1: 64-101 https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1003
  17. 김병옥, 박규원, 디자인의 시각적 유사성 판단을 위한 체크리스트 설정 연구, 디지털디자인학연구, Vol.11, 2006년 11월
  18. 김지훈, 주정규, 디자인보호법에서 규정하고 있는 디자인의 유사성에 대한 개념적 이해, 한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집 2011년 10월
  19. 모영일, 이철규, 내용기반 이미지 검색에 있어 이미지 속성정보를 활용한 검색 효율성 향상, 한국시뮬레이션학회 논문지, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2009년 6월
  20. 박하나, "특허청, 헤이그협정 가입.. 7월부터 달라지는 국제디자인 출원", 파이낸셜 뉴스, 2014년 4월 3일
  21. 유호정, 실내디자인 보호체계 및 현황에 관한 연구 - 미국과 한국의 디자인 및 상표등록 사례비교를 중심으로-, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 제23권 3호, 2014년 6월
  22. 이명숙, 디자인 보호제도 발전방향에 관한 연구-디자인의 특허제도를 중심으로-, 한남대 행정정책대학원 석사논문, 2005년 12월
  23. 이상열, 황병곤, 예제 이미지와 사용자 스케치 질의에 의한 웹기반 이미지 검색 시스템, 대구대학교 정보통신연구소 정보통신연구, 제2권 제2호, 2004년
  24. 이재준, 신민기, 백우진, 신문선, SOM을 이용한 등록상표에 대한 내용기반 이미지 검색, 한국정보처리학회 춘계학술논문집 제14권 제1호, 2007년
  25. 진선태, 디자인의 유사성 및 창작성 판단에 관한 프레임워크 연구, 지식재산연구 제8권 제1호, 2013년 3월
  26. 특허청, 헤이그 협정 및 로카르노 분류 도입에 따른 디자인 심사 및 무심사 품목 재조정 방안 연구, 특허청 보고서, 2011년 12월
  27. 디자인 보호법, 법률 제 11962호, 제2조
  28. www.img-rummager.com