DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth of Containerized Chamaecyparis obtusa Seedlings as Affected by Fertilizer and Container Volume

시비수준 및 용기용적에 따른 편백 용기묘의 생장 특성

  • Jae, Dai-Young (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Seo, Huiyeong (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Seo (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ahn, Hyun-Chul (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Choonsig (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
  • 제대영 (경남과학기술대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 서희영 (경남과학기술대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 조현서 (경남과학기술대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 안현철 (경남과학기술대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 김춘식 (경남과학기술대학교 산림자원학과)
  • Received : 2014.07.25
  • Accepted : 2014.09.29
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the growth characteristics, carbon and nitrogen content of containerized 1-0 Chamaecyparis obtusa seedlings at various levels of fertilizer (2 g/L, 1 g/L, control) and three container volumes (500 mL, 400 mL, 320 mL). The growth of root collar diameter was highest in the 2 g/L (3.14 mm), followed by the 1 g/L (2.75 mm) and control (2.41 mm) treatments, while the height of seedling was significantly higher in the 1 g/L (21.88 cm) than other treatments (2 g/L: 20.92 cm; control: 19.06 cm). The growth of root collar diameter by container volume was better in the 500 mL than in the 320 mL. Dry weight of seedling was the highest in the 1 g/L ($4.41g\;seedling^{-1}$), followed by the control ($3.67g\;seedling^{-1}$) and the 2 g/L ($2.92g\;seedling^{-1}$) treatments. The dry weight of seedlings by container volume was significantly higher in the 500 mL than in the 320 mL. Nitrogen concentration in foliage was ranged from 1.51% in the control to 2.45-2.60% in the fertilizer treatments. However, carbon concentration of seedlings was not affected by the fertilizer or the container volume treatments. The growth of seedlings following planting in mountain area was better in the fertilized seedlings compared with in the unfertilized seedlings. The results indicate that the 1 g/L fertilization was an optimum rate for growth following planting of Chamaecyparis obtusa seedlings.

본 연구는 편백나무 1-0 용기묘를 대상으로 시비수준(2 g/L, 1 g/L, 대조구)과 용기용적(500 mL, 400 mL, 320 mL)에 따른 생육특성, 묘목 내 탄소 및 질소함량, 320 mL 용기용적에서 생육한 편백 2-0 용기묘의 산지 식재 후 생장상태를 조사하였다. 편백나무 용기묘의 근원경 생장량은 2 g/L 시비처리구 3.14 mm, 1 g/L 시비처리구 2.75 mm, 대조구 2.41 mm순이었으며, 묘고의 경우 1 g/L 시비처리구는 21.88 cm로, 대조구 20.92 cm나 2 g/L 시비처리구 19.06 cm에 비해 유의적으로(P<0.05) 높게 나타났다. 용기용적의 경우 500 mL가 320 mL보다 유의적으로 높은 근원경과 묘고 생장을 보였다. 시비 수준에 따른 묘목 건중량은 1 g/L 처리구가 $4.41g\;seedling^{-1}$로 대조구 $3.67g\;seedling^{-1}$나 2 g/L 처리구 $2.92g\;seedling^{-1}$에 비해 유의적으로 높았다. 또한 500 mL이나 400 mL 용기용적이 320 mL 용기용적에 비해 유의적으로 묘목 건중량이 높았다. 잎 내 질소 함량은 시비처리구(2.45-2.60%)가 대조구(1.51%)에 비해 유의적으로 높았으나 묘목 각 부위 별 탄소함량의 경우 시비처리나 용기용적에 따른 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 편백나무 2-0 용기묘를 산지 식재한 후 근원경과 묘고 생장을 조사한 결과 시비처리 용기묘가 대조구에 비해 생장이 양호하였다. 편백나무 용기묘 생장 및 산지 식재 후 생육특성을 고려할 때 용기묘 양성을 위한 적정시비수준은 1 g/L로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bert, D. and Danjon, D. 2006. Carbon concentration variations in the roots, stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.). Forest Ecology and Management 222: 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.030
  2. Cho, M.S., Lee, S.W., Bae, J.H., and Park, G.S. 2011. Effect of different fertilization on physiological characteristics and growth performances of Eucalyptus pellita and Acacia mangium in a container nursery system. Journal of Bio-Environment Control 20: 123-133.
  3. Cho, M.S., Lee, S.W., Hwang, J.H., and Kim, S.G. 2012. Growth performances of container seedlings of deciduous hardwood plantation species grown at different container types. Journal of Korean Forest Society 101: 324-332.
  4. Dominguez-Lerena, S., Sierra, N.H., Manzano, I.C., Bueno, L.O., Rubira, J.L.P., and Mexal, J.G. 2006. Container characteristics influence Pinus pinea seedling development in the nursery and field. Forest Ecology and Management 221: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.031
  5. Dumroese, R.K. 2003. Hardening fertilization and nutrient loading of conifer seedlings. USDA Forest Service, Proceeding RMRS-P-28: 31-36.
  6. Dumroese, R.K., Parkhurst, J., and Barnett, J.P. 2005. Controlled release fertilizer improves quality of container longleaf pine seedlings. USDA Forest Service, Proceedings RMRS-P-35: 3-8.
  7. Entry, J.A., Runion, G.B., Prior, S.A, Mitchell, R.J., and Rogers, H.H. 1998. Influence if $CO_2$ enrichment and nitrogen fertilization on tissue chemistry and carbon allocation in longleaf pine seedling. Plant and Soil 200: 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004305320030
  8. Fraysse and Cremiere. 1998. Nursery factors influencing containerized Pinus pinaster seedlings' initial growth. Silva Fennica 32: 261-270.
  9. Gough, C.M., Seiler, J.R., and Maier, C.A. 2004. Short-term effects of fertilization on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) physiology. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 876-886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01193.x
  10. Hwang, J.O., Son, Y., Yi, M.J., Byoun, J.K., Jung, J.H., and Lee, C.Y. 2003. Studies on relationship between composition and type of fertilizer and seedling I. Influence on biomass, specific leaf area and chlorophyll content. Journal of Korean Forestry Energy 22: 44-53.
  11. Hwang, J.O., Son, Y., Yi, M.J., Byoun, J.K., Jung, J.H., and Lee, C.Y. 2005. Relationship between composition and type of fertilizer and seedling growth II. Nutrient concentration of seedling components. Journal of Korea Forestry Energy 24: 13-27.
  12. Jackson, D.P., Dumroese, R.K., Barnett, J.P., and Patterson, W.B. 2007. Container longleaf pine seedling morphology in response to varying rates of nitrogen fertilization in nursery and subsequent growth after outplanting. USDA Forest Service, Proceeding RMRS-P-50: 114-119.
  13. Jacobs, D.F. and Timmer, V.R. 2005. Fertilizer-induced changes in rhizosphere electrical conductivity: relation to forest tree seedling root system growth and function. New Forests 30: 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-6572-z
  14. Jeong, J. Park. JH, Kim, JK, Lim, JT. Lee, S.R., and Kim C. 2010. Effects of caontainer volumes and fertilization on red (Pinus densiflora) and black pine (Pinus thunbergii) seedlings growth. Forest Science and Technology 6: 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2010.9671975
  15. Kim, C., Jeong, J., Moon, T.S., Park, J.H., Lim, J.T., Kim, J.I., and Goo, G.H. 2009. Growth, carbon and nitrogen status of container grown black pine (Pinus thunbergii) seedlings at various levels of fertilization. Journal of Korean Forest Society 98: 558-562.
  16. Kim, J.J., Lee, K.J., Song, K.S., Cha, Y.G., Chung, Y.S., Lee, J.H., and Yoon, T.S. 2010. Exploration of optimum container for production of Larix leptolepsis container seedlings. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99: 638-644.
  17. Korea Forest Research Institute. 2007. Manual for Production of 2-0 Pine Container Seedlings. Research Report on Korea Forest Research Institute. pp. 45.
  18. Kwon, K.W., Cho, M.S., Kim, G.N., Lee, S.W., and Jang, K.H. 2009. Photosynthetic characteristics and growth performances of containerized seedling and bare root seedling of Quercus acutissima growing at different fertilizing schemes. Journal of Korean Forest Society 98: 331-338.
  19. Landis, T.D., Tinus, R.W., McDonald, S.E., and Barnett, J.P. 1989. Seedling Nutrition and Irrigation. Vol. 4. The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Agricultural Handbook 674. pp. 119.
  20. McConnaughay, K.D.M. and F.A. Bazzaz. 1991. Is physical space a soil resource? Ecology 72: 94-103. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938905
  21. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2005. Development of Production Method for Container Seedling with High Quality. pp. 180.
  22. Oliet, J., Planelles, R., Segura, M.L., Artero, F., and Jacobs, D.F. 2004. Mineral nutrition and growth of containerized Pinus halepensis seedlings under controlled-release fertilizer. Scientia Horticulture 103: 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.019
  23. Ortega, U., Majada, J., Mena-Petite, A., Sanchez-Zabala, J., Rodriguez-Iturrizar, N., Txarterina, K., Azpitarte, J., and Dunabeitia, M. 2006. Field performance of Pinus radiata D.Don produced in nursery with different types of container. New Forests 31: 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-004-7364-6
  24. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT Statistical Software. Version 9.1. SAS publishing Cary, NC.
  25. Song, K.S., Cha, Y.G., Cho, J.Y., and, Kim, J.J. 2012. Comparison of growth characteristics of 1- and 2-year-old bare root and container seedling of Chamaecyparis obtusa. Journal of Korean Forest Society 101: 317-323.
  26. South, D.B., Harris, S.W., Barnett, J.P. Hainds, M.J., and Gjerstad, D.H. 2005. Effects of container type and seedling size on survival and early height growth of Pinus palustris seedlings in Alabama, U.S.A. Forest Ecology and Management 204: 385-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.016
  27. William, H. and Stroupe, M. 2002. First-year survival and growth of bareroot and container water oak and willow oak seedlings grown at different levels of mineral nutrition. In Outcalt, K.W., ed. Proceedings of the Eleventh Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-48: 338-341.
  28. Zhang, Q., Wang, C., Wang, X., and Quan, X. 2009. Carbon concentration variability of 10 Chinese temperate tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.009

Cited by

  1. 편백림의 1차 솎아베기 방법에 따른 생장효과와 적절성 연구 vol.108, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2019.108.3.349
  2. Effects of shading and fertilizer treatments on the growth characteristics of Chamaecyparis obtusa (S. et Z.) Endlicher seedlings vol.17, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2021.1957722