Smart Structures and Systems

  • 제15권5호
  • /
  • Pages.1253-1270
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1738-1584(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-1991(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Damage detection based on MCSS and PSO using modal data

  • Kaveh, Ali (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Maniat, Mohsen (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.20
  • 심사 : 2014.04.28
  • 발행 : 2015.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper Magnetic Charged System Search (MCSS) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are applied to the problem of damage detection using frequencies and mode shapes of the structures. The objective is to identify the location and extent of multi-damage in structures. Both natural frequencies and mode shapes are used to form the required objective function. To moderate the effect of noise on measured data, a penalty approach is applied. A variety of numerical examples including two beams and two trusses are considered. A comparison between the PSO and MCSS is conducted to show the efficiency of the MCSS in finding the global optimum. The results show that the present methodology can reliably identify damage scenarios using noisy measurements and incomplete data.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arumugam, M. and Rao, M. (2008), "On the improved performances of the particle swarm optimization algorithms with adaptive parameters, cross-over operators and root mean square (RMS) variants for computing optimal control of a class of hybrid systems", Appl. Soft Comput., 8(1), 324-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2007.01.010
  2. Carden, E. and Fanning, P. (2004), "Vibration based condition monitoring: a review", Struct. Health Monit., 3(4), 355-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921704047500
  3. S., Farrar, C. and Prime, M. (1998), "A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods", Shock Vib.Ddigest, 30(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000201
  4. Esfandiari, A., Bakhtiari-Nejad, F., Rahai, A. and Sanayei, M. (2009), "Structural model updating using frequency response function and quasi-linear sensitivity equation", J. Sound Vib., 326(3), 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.07.001
  5. Fan, W. and Qiao, P. (2011), "Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study", Struct. Health Monit., 10(1), 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921710365419
  6. Friswell, M. and Mottershead, J. (2001), "Physical understanding of structures by model updating", Proceedings of the COST F3 International Conference on Structural System Identification.
  7. Friswell, M., Penny, J. and Garvey, S. (1998), "A combined genetic and eigensensitivity algorithm for the location of damage in structures", Comput. Struct., 69(5), 547-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00125-4
  8. Kaveh, A. (2014), Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures, Springer Verlag, Switzerland, May 2014.
  9. Kaveh, A., Javadi, S.M. and Maniat, M. (2014), "Damage assessment via modal data with a mixed particle swarm strategy, ray optimizer, and harmony search", Asian J. Civil Eng., 15(1), 95-106.
  10. Kaveh, A., Share, M. and Moslehi, M. (2013), "Magnetic charged system search: a new meta-heuristic algorithm for optimization", Acta Mech., 224 (1), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-012-0745-6
  11. Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A. (2015), "An improved CSS for damage detection of truss structures using changes in natural frequencies", Adv. Eng. Softw., 80, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.010
  12. Kim, J.T., Ryu, Y.S., Cho, H.M. and Stubbs, N. (2003), "Damage identification in beam-type structures: frequency-based method vs mode-shape-based method", Eng. Struct., 25(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00118-9
  13. Liszkai, T. and Raich, A. (2005), "Solving inverse problems in structural damage identification using advanced genetic algorithm representations", Proceeding of the 6th Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. ISSMO.
  14. Maity, D. and Tripathy, R. (2005), "Damage assessment of structures from changes in natural frequencies using genetic algorithm", Struct. Eng. Mech., 19, 21-42. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.19.1.021
  15. Majumdar, A., Maiti, D. and Maity, D. (2012), "Damage assessment of truss structures from changes in natural frequencies using ant colony optimization", Appl. Math. Comput., 218(19), 9759-9772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.03.031
  16. Miguel, L., Miguel, L., Kaminski Jr, J. and Riera, J. (2012), "Damage detection under ambient vibration by harmony search algorithm", Expert Syst. Appl., 39(10), 9704-9714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.147
  17. Parsopoulos, K. and Vrahatis, M. (2007), "Parameter selection and adaptation in unified particle swarm optimization", Math. Comput. Model., 46(1), 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.12.019
  18. Ratnaweera, A., Halgamuge, S. and Watson, H. (2004), "Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients", IEEE T. Evolut. Comput., 8(3), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2004.826071
  19. Sahoo, B. and Maity, D. (2007), "Damage assessment of structures using hybrid neuro-genetic algorithm", Appl. Soft Comput ., 7(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2005.04.001
  20. Shi, Y. and Eberhart, R. (2001), "Fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization", Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation.
  21. Villalba, J. and Laier, J. (2012), "Localising and quantifying damage by means of a multi-chromosome genetic algorithm", Adv. Eng. Softw., 50, 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.02.002
  22. Yang, Q.W. and Liu, J.K. (2007), "Structural damage identification based on residual force vector", J. Sound Vib., 305(1), 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.03.033

피인용 문헌

  1. Dolphin Echolocation Optimization: Continuous search space vol.1, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2016.1.2.175
  2. Detection of damage in truss structures using Simplified Dolphin Echolocation algorithm based on modal data vol.18, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.18.5.983
  3. A combination of damage locating vector method (DLV) and differential evolution algorithm (DE) for structural damage assessment 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0379-1
  4. Structural damage detection using improved particle swarm optimization 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2017.1347168
  5. Multi-class teaching–learning-based optimization for truss design with frequency constraints vol.106, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.039
  6. Cost optimum design of post-tensioned concrete bridges using a modified colliding bodies optimization algorithm vol.98, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.03.003
  7. Damage identification in three-dimensional structures using single-objective evolutionary algorithms and finite element model updating: evaluation and comparison 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2017.1414206
  8. Natural Computing Applied to the Underground System: A Synergistic Approach for Smart Cities vol.18, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124094
  9. Detecting width-wise partial delamination in the composite beam using generalized fractal dimension vol.19, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.19.1.091
  10. A novel heuristic search algorithm for optimization with application to structural damage identification vol.19, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.19.4.449
  11. School based optimization algorithm for design of steel frames vol.171, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.085
  12. An Improved Objective Function for Modal-Based Damage Identification Using Substructural Virtual Distortion Method vol.9, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050971
  13. Structural damage assessment with incomplete and noisy modal data using model reduction technique and LAPO algorithm vol.15, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1624785
  14. Feasibility study on model-based damage detection in shear frames using pseudo modal strain energy vol.25, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.1.047
  15. Structural damage identification of truss structures using self-controlled multi-stage particle swarm optimization vol.25, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.3.345
  16. Baseline updating method for structural damage identification using modal residual force and grey wolf optimization vol.52, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2019.1593400
  17. A fast-convergent approach for damage assessment using CMA-ES optimization algorithm and modal parameters vol.10, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00397-1
  18. Damage detection in truss bridges using transmissibility and machine learning algorithm: Application to Nam O bridge vol.26, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.26.1.035
  19. A novel sensitivity-based method for damage detection of a structural element vol.21, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00263-x
  20. A fast damage detecting technique for indeterminate trusses vol.75, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.75.5.585
  21. Optimization of fuzzy controller for nonlinear buildings with improved charged system search vol.76, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.6.781
  22. Damage detection in structures using Particle Swarm Optimization combined with Artificial Neural Network vol.28, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2021.28.1.001