Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제8권5호
  • /
  • Pages.977-994
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of loads in Turkish earthquake code with those computed statistically

  • Firat, Fatih K. (Department of Civil Engineering, Aksaray University) ;
  • Yucemen, M. Semih (Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.12
  • 심사 : 2014.11.06
  • 발행 : 2015.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, earthquake loads are investigated statistically and compared with the nominal earthquake loads calculated according to the Turkish Earthquake Code, namely: "Specifications for Structures to be Built in Earthquake Areas". For this purpose, the "actual" mean load values estimated from statistical methods and the nominal load values computed according the Seismic Code are compared, with respect to some variations in the basic parameters, such as the importance factor, building height, site coefficient, seismic zone and seismic load reduction factor. In addition to the data compiled from different regions of Turkey, the published data and information in the foreign literature are also used in the determination of the earthquake load statistics. Although the dead and live loads acting on a structure are independent of the geographical location of the structure, environmental loads, such as earthquake loads are highly dependent on the location of the structure. Accordingly, for the assessment of statistical parameters associated with earthquake loads, twelve different locations which can represent the different seismic zones of Turkey as accurately as possible are chosen. As a result of the code calibration procedure considered in this study, it is observed that the load values obtained from the Turkish Seismic Code may overestimate or underestimate the actual seismic loads in some of the seismic zones.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ang, A.H.S. and Tang, W.H. (2003), Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, II, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA.
  2. Celep, Z., Erken, A., Taskin, B. and Ilki, A. (2011), "Failures of masonry and concrete buildings during the March 8, 2010 Kovancilar and Palu (Elazig) earthquakes in Turkey", Eng. Fail. Anal., 18(3), 868-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.11.001
  3. Dogangun, A. and Sezen, H. (2012), "Seismic vulnerability and preservation of historical masonry monumental structures", Earthq. Struct., 3(1), 1, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.1.083
  4. Dogangun, A., Ural, A., Sezen, H., Guney, Y. and Firat, F.K. (2013), "The 2011 earthquake in Simav, Turkey and seismic damage to reinforced concrete buildings", Building., 3(1), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings3010173
  5. Ellingwood, B.R., Galambos, T.V., MacGregor, J.G. and Cornell, C.A. (1980), Development of a Probability Based Load Criterion for American National Standards A58, NPS Special Publication 577.
  6. Ellingwood, B.R. (1994), "Probability-based codified design for earthquakes", Eng. Struct., 16(7), 498-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(94)90086-8
  7. Ergunay, O. (2007), "Disaster profile of Turkey", Symposium on Disaster TMMOB, Turkey.
  8. Firat, E. (2009), "The effects of 17 August Marmara earthquake on the Turkish economic crisis of 2000 November", Int. Earthq. Symposium, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  9. Firat, F.K. (2007), "Development of load and resistance factors for reinforced concrete structures in Turkey", Ph. D. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  10. Firat, F.K. and Yucemen, M.S. (2014), "Determination of reliability based new load and resistance factors for reinforced concrete structural members", Teknik Dergi, 25(3), 6805-6829.
  11. Gulkan, P., Kocyigit, A., Yucemen, M.S., Doyuran, V. and Basoz, N. (1993), Seismic Zoning Map of Turkey prepared according to the most recent data, Report No. 93-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University.
  12. Hester, P. (2012), "Epistemic uncertainty analysis: an approach using expert judgment and evidential credibility", Int. J. Qual., Stat. Reliab., 2012, Article ID 617481, 1-9.
  13. Hwang, H.H.M. and Hsu, H.M. (1993), "Seismic LRFD criteria for RC moment-resisting frame buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 119(2921), 1807-1824. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:6(1807)
  14. International Building Code (2003), International Code Council, USA.
  15. Inel, M., Bilgin, H. and Ozmen, H.B. (2008), "Performance of mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings during recent earthquakes in Turkey", Teknik Dergi, 19(1), 4319-4331.
  16. Komurcu, A.M. and Yucemen, M.S. (1996), "Load and resistance factors for reinforced concrete beams considering the design practice in Turkey", Concrete Technology for Developing countries, Fourth International Conference, Eastern Mediterranean University, GaziMagusa, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.
  17. Nowak, A.S. and Szerszen, M.M. (2003), "Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318): Part 1- statistical models for resistance", ACI Struct. J., 100(3), 377-382.
  18. Ozhendekci, N. and Ozhendekci, D. (2012), "Rapid seismic vulnerability assessment of low- to mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings using Bingol's regional data", Earthq. Spectra, 28(3), 1165-1187. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000065
  19. Ozmen, G. (2008), "Determination of equivalent static earthquake loads using the results of mode superposition method", Teknik Dergi, 19(4), 4509-4520.
  20. Real, M.V., Filho, A.C. and Sergio, R.M. (2003), "Response variability in reinforced concrete structures with uncertain geometrical and material properties", Nucl. Eng. Des., 226(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(03)00110-9
  21. Sezen, H., Whittaker, A.S., Elwood, K.J. and Mosalam, K.W. (2003), "Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and the seismic design and construction practice in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 25(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9
  22. Sengoz, A. and Sucuoglu, H. (2009), "Pros and cons of assessment methods in the 2007 Turkish earthquake code", Teknik Dergi, 20(1), 4609-4633.
  23. Turkish Earthquake Code (1996), The Draft of Specifications for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas1996, T.C., Ministry of Environment and City Planning, Turkey.
  24. Turkish Earthquake Code (1998), The Specifications for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas 1998, T.C., Ministry of Environment and City Planning, Turkey.
  25. Turkish Earthquake Code (2007), The Specifications for Structures to be Built in Earthquake Areas 2007, T.C. Ministry of Environment and City Planning, Turkey.
  26. Uniform Building Code (1994), International Conference of Buildings Officials, Whitter, California, USA.
  27. Ural, A. (2013), "19th May 2011 Simav (Kutahya) earthquake and response of masonry Halil Aga Mosque", Earthq. Struct., 4(6), 671-683. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.6.671
  28. Yuksel, S.B. (1997), "A comparative study on seismic codes", Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.