Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제54권4호
  • /
  • Pages.741-754
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of engineering demand parameters for RC wall structures

  • Pavel, Florin (Department of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest) ;
  • Pricopie, Andrei (Department of Strength of Materials, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest)
  • 투고 : 2014.05.05
  • 심사 : 2015.04.04
  • 발행 : 2015.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study evaluates prediction models for three EDPs (engineering demand parameters) using data from three symmetrical structures with RC walls designed according to the currently enforced Romanian seismic design code P100-1/2013. The three analyzed EDPs are: the maximum interstorey drift, the maximum top displacement and the maximum shear force at the base of the RC walls. The strong ground motions used in this study consist of three pairs of recordings from the Vrancea intermediate-depth earthquakes of 1977, 1986 and 1990, as well as two other pairs of recordings from significant earthquakes in Turkey and Greece (Erzincan and Aigion). The five pairs of recordings are rotated in a clockwise direction and the values of the EDPs are recorded. Finally, the relation between various IMs (intensity measures) of the strong ground motion records and the EDPs is studied and two prediction models for EDPs are also evaluated using the analysis of residuals.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arias, A. (1970), "A measure of earthquake intensity", Ed. Hansen, R.J., Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  2. Athanatopoulou, A.M. (2005), "Critical orientation of three correlated seismic components", Eng. Struct., 27(2), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.011
  3. Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C.A. (2008), "Vector-valued intensity measures incorporating spectral shape for prediction of structural response", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(4), 534-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701673076
  4. Belletti, B., Damoni, C. and Gasperi, A. (2013), "Modeling approaches suitable for pushover analyses of RC structural wall buildings", Eng. Struct., 57, 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.023
  5. Bradley, B.A., Cubrinovski, M., MacRae, G.A. and Dhakal, R.P. (2009), "Ground-motion prediction equation for SI based on spectral acceleration equations", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 99(1), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080044
  6. Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2011), "Prediction equations for the standardized version of cumulative absolute velocity for use in the shutdown of US nuclear power plants", Nucl. Eng. Des., 241, 2558-2569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.04.020
  7. Cantagallo, C., Camataa, G. and Spacone, B. (2015), "Influence of ground motion selection methods on seismic directionality effects", Earthq. Struct., 8(1), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.185
  8. CR 2-1-1.1/2013, Design code for RC structural wall building, Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania.
  9. Del Carpio Ramos, M., Whittaker, A.S. and Gulec, C.K. (2012), "Predictive equations for the peak shear strength of low-aspect ratio reinforced concrete walls", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(2), 159-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.613529
  10. EPRI - Electrical Power Research Institute (1988), "A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake", Report no. EPRI NP-5930, Palo Alto, California.
  11. Eurocode 8 (2004), Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part I: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
  12. Gunay, M.S. and Sucuoglu, H. (2009), "Predicting the seismic response of capacity-designed structures by equivalent linearization", J. Earthq. Eng., 13(5), 623-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802632310
  13. Hancock, J. and Bommer, J.J. (2007), "Using spectral matched records to explore the influence of strongmotion duration on inelastic structural response", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 27(4), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.09.004
  14. Kalkan, E. and Reyes, J.C. (2013), "Significance of rotating ground motions on behavior of symmetric- and asymmetric-plan structures: part 2. Case studies", Earthq. Spectra, doi: 10.1193/072012EQS242M.
  15. Kalkan, E. and Kwong, N.S. (2014), "Pros and cons of rotating ground motions records to fault normal/parallel directions for response history analysis of buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 140(3), 04013062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000845
  16. Kappos, A.J. and Antoniadis, A. (2011), "Evaluation and suggestions for improvement of seismic design procedures for R/C walls in dual systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1019
  17. Kazaz, I., Gulkan, P. and Yakut, A. (2012), "Deformation limits for structural walls with confined boundaries", Earthq. Spectra, 28(3), 1019-1046. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000059
  18. Kempton, J.J. and Stewart, J.P. (2006), "Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects", Earthq. Spectra, 22(4), 985-1013. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2358175
  19. Nguyen, V.T. and Kim, D. (2013), "Influence of incident angles of earthquakes on inelastic responses of asymmetric-plan structures", Struct. Eng, Mech., 45(3), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.3.373
  20. P100-1/2013, Code for seismic design - Part I - Design prescriptions for buildings, Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania.
  21. Pavel, F., Aldea, A. and Vacareanu, R. (2013), "Near-field strong ground motions records from Vrancea earthquakes", Proceedings of the International Conference on Earthquake Engineering SE-50 EEE, Skopje, Macedonia.
  22. Rathje, E.M., Abrahamson, N.A. and Bray, J.D. (1998), "Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(2), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150)
  23. Reyes, J.C. and Kalkan, E. (2013), "Significance of rotating ground motions on behavior of symmetric- and asymmetric-plan structures: part 1. Single story structures", Earthq. Spectra, doi: 10.1193/072012EQS241M.
  24. Riddell, R. (2007), "On ground motion intensity indices", Earthq. Spectra, 23(1), 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2424748
  25. Rigato, A.B. and Medina, R.A. (2007), "Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions", Eng. Struct., 29(10), 2593-2601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.008
  26. Romao, X., Delgado, R. and Costa A. (2012a), "Statistical characterization of structural demand under earthquake loading. Part 1: robust estimation of the central value of the data", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(6), 686-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.669514
  27. Romao, X., Delgado, R. and Costa A. (2012a), "Statistical characterization of structural demand under earthquake loading. Part 1: robust estimation of the dispersion of the data", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(6), 864-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.669515
  28. Shabestari, K. and Yamazaki, F. (2001), "A proposal of instrumental seismic intensity scale compatible with MMI evaluated from three-component acceleration records", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 17(4), 711-723.
  29. Stafford, P.J., Strasser, F.O. and Bommer, J.J. (2008), "An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 6(2), 149-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9053-2
  30. Valoroso, N., Marmo, F. and Sessa, S. (2014), "Limit state analysis of reinforced shear walls", Eng. Struct., 61, 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.032
  31. Von Thun, J.L., Roehm, L.H., Scott, G.A. and Wilson, J.A. (1988), "Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams", Ed. Von Thun, J.L., Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II - Recent Advances in Ground-Motion Evaluation, Geotechnical Special Publication no. 20, 463-481.
  32. Wang, X., Masaki, K. and Irikura, K. (2011), "Building damage criteria from strong ground motion characteristics during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake", J. Earthq. Eng., 15(7), 1117-1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.552311
  33. Watson-Lamprey, J. (2009), Chapter 4 "Point of comparison", Ed. Haselton, C., Evaluation of ground motion selection and modification methods: predicting median interstorey drift response for buildings, PEER Report 2009/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  34. Zhai, C., Chang, Z., Li, S. and Xie, L. (2013), "Selection of the most unfavorable real ground motions for low-and mid-rise RC frame structures", J. Earthq. Eng., 17(8), 1233-1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.837415
  35. http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/net/saito/stera3d/

피인용 문헌

  1. Flexural behavior of anchor horizontal boundary element in steel plate shear wall vol.17, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-9017-6
  2. Influence of Rotating Strong Ground Motions on the Response of Doubly Symmetrical RC Wall Structures in Romania and Its Implication on Code Provisions vol.17, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0346-4