DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing Technology Innovation Capability Evaluation Model for Small and Medium Enterprises

중소기업 육성을 위한 기술혁신역량 평가모형개발

  • Cho, Joonggil (School of Industrial Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Sun (Graduate School of Consulting, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Byun, Min-Seok (School of Industrial Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jonghwan (School of Industrial Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kang, Kyungsu (Department of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Kwangju Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Seongbin (Graduate School of Consulting, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 조중길 (금오공과대학교 산업공학부) ;
  • 이상순 (금오공과대학교 컨설팅대학원) ;
  • 변민석 (금오공과대학교 산업공학부) ;
  • 이종환 (금오공과대학교 산업공학부) ;
  • 강경수 (광주여자대학교 대체의학과) ;
  • 이승빈 (금오공과대학교 컨설팅대학원)
  • Received : 2015.02.24
  • Accepted : 2015.03.10
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

In this research, technology innovation capability evaluation model for small and medium enterprises was developed. To develop technology innovation capability evaluation model, two analytic technic was used. First one is AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to give weight to each main index. Second one is fuzzy set theory to represent ambiguous index to numerical value. Finally, technology innovation capability evaluation model was achieved in combination with the same weight to AHP analysis and fuzzy set theory. With these results, small and medium enterprises can know important point in terms of strengthening the innovation capability evaluation.

Keywords

References

  1. Evaluating SME's innovation capability and analyzing SME innovation policy(I), Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2010.
  2. Evaluating SME's innovation capability and analyzing SME innovation policy(II), Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2011.
  3. Saaty, T.L., Fundaments of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, PA : RWS publication, 1994.
  4. Kim, B.-C., Priority Analysis on Corporate Social Contribution Programs Through Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Advertising Research, 2006, Vol. 71, pp. 131-151.
  5. Jang, C.-Y., Park, D.-K., and Kwak, H.-R., The Developing Model for Evaluation Performance of Local Police Organization : Application of Fuzzy Set Theory and AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). Korean Association of Public Safety and Criminal Justice, 2009, pp. 47-89.
  6. Zadeh, L.A., Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 1965, Vol. 8, pp. 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  7. Al-Najjar, B. and Alsyourf, I., Selecting the Most Efficient Maintenance Approach using fuzzy multiple criteria Decision Making. International Journal of production Economics, 2003, Vol. 84, pp. 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8
  8. Tsaur, S.H., Chang, T.Y., and Yen, C.H., The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 2002, Vol. 23, pp. 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00050-4
  9. Rhee, H.-C., Lee, K.-Y., and Lee, I.-J., Fuzzy Set Theory As a Method of Policy Evaluation. The Korean Association for Policy Studies, 2007, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 67-91.
  10. Rhee, H.-C. and Sim, W.I., Evaluation of Programs Designed to Enhance the Personnel Structure of SMEs in Korea : Using Fuzzy Set Theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 2010, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 67-91.