Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity

The Korean Society of Systematic Zoology (한국동물분류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New Records of Remora brachyptera and R. osteochir (Perciformes: Echeneidae) from Korea

  • Myoung, Se Hun (Department of Marine Biology, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Myoung, Jung-Goo (East Sea Research Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Koo (Department of Marine Biology, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2015.01.20
  • Accepted : 2015.03.25
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Remora brachyptera and R. osteochir, belonging to the family Echeneidae were collected for the first time off Jeju Island, Korea, in July and August 2013 and off Ganggu-myeon, Yeongdeok-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do in June 2014. Remora brachyptera is characterized by a sucker with 16 pairs of disc laminae and a dorsal fin that originates anterior of the origin of the anal fin. Remora osteochir is characterized by a sucker with 18 pairs of disc laminae and a sucking disc that extends beyond the posterior end of the pectoral fin. New Korean names proposed for the species are "Meo-ri-ppal-pan-i" for R. brachyptera and "Ppyeo-dae-ppal-pan-i" for R. osteochir.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

The family Echeneidae, order Perciformes, comprises 8 species and 3 genera worldwide (Gray et al., 2009), 7 species and 3 genera in Japan (Hatooka and Kai, 2013), and 4 species and 3 genera in Korea (Lee and Joo, 2006). The Korean species are Echeneis naucrates Linnaeus, 1758, Remora remora (Linnaeus, 1758), Remora albescens (Temminck and Schlegel, 1850), and Phtheirichthys lineatus (Menzies, 1791). Echeneidae are distributed worldwide in tropical and subtropical seas (Nelson, 2006). The family is characterized by an elongate body, flattened head, sucking disc on the dorsal surface of the head, lower jaw projecting past the upper jaw, absence of spines on the dorsal and anal fins, and no swim bladder (Nelson, 2006). Echeneidae species attach to numerous species of marine vertebrates including sharks, rays, marlins, sea turtles, whales, and dugong (Carpenter, 2002), and also to ships and various floating objects. Some species show considerable host specificity (Paulin and Habib, 1982), and some are free-swimming (Gomon et al., 2008). Some Remora species feed on the ectoparasites of their host, as well as on any available small prey (Heemstra, 1986).

The remoras have been the subject of numerous studies, including studies on the ontogeny and homology of the skeletal elements (Britz and Johnson, 2012), molecular phylogeny (Gray et al., 2009), morphological phylogeny (O’Toole, 2002), and geographic distribution (Dennis et al., 2004; Lee and Joo, 2006; Tuncer et al., 2012).

In the present study, two specimens of R. brachyptera and one specimen of R. osteochir were collected off Korea; both species, are unrecorded in the Korean fish fauna. Therefore, the aim of the present study is that we described the two newly recorded species. We also provide descriptions and morphological character about two species.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens of R. brachyptera were collected by purse seine and stationary nets off southern Jeju Island (33˚33′N, 128˚ 03′E) in July 2013 and off Ganggu-myeon, Yeongdeok-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do (36˚21′N, 129˚28′E) in June 2014. The specimen of R. osteochir was collected by purse seine off southern Jeju Island (33˚39′N, 127˚13′E) in August 2013. Counts and measurements follow Nakabo (2013) (body parts were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm using Vernier calipers). The number of vertebrae and fin rays were counted from radiographs (SOFTEX HA-100; Softex, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were deposited at the Ichthyological Laboratory, Pukyong National University (PKU), Korea.

 

SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNTS

Order Perciformes

Family Echeneidae

Genus Remora Gill, 1862

1*Remora brachyptera (Lowe, 1839) (Table 1, Fig. 1) (new Korean name: Meo-ri-ppal-pan-i)

Table 1.Comparison of counts and measurements for Remora brachyptera

Fig. 1.A, Remora brachyptera (Lowe, 1839); PKU 9440, standard length (SL), 209.0 mm (up); B, PKU 11044; SL, 180.2 mm (color variation) (down); C, D, Dorsal views of sucking discs. Red arrows represent posterior end of the disc (a), posterior end of the pectoral fin (b), origin of the dorsal fin (c), and origin of the anal fin (d).

Echeneis brachyptera Lowe, 1839: 89 (type locality: Madeira, eastern Atlantic).

Echeneis nieuhofii Bleeker, 1853: 279 (Indonesia).

Echeneis pallida Temminck and Schlegel, 1850: 271, Pl. 120 (Japan).

Echeneis quatuordecimlaminatus Storer, 1839: 496 (USA).

Echeneis sexdecimlamellata Eydoux and Gervais, 1837: 1, Pl. 16 (Indian Ocean); Bauchot and Desoutter, 1989: 14 (France).

Remora brachyptera: Lachner, 1973: 639 (north-eastern Atlantic, Mediterranean); Bañón et al., 2010: 16 (Spain); Hatooka and Kai, 2013: 874 (Japan); Wirtz et al., 2013: 123 (Australia).

Material examined. One specimen, 209.0 mm standard length (SL), collected by purse seine net off southern Jeju Island, Korea (33˚33′N, 128˚03′E), Jul 2013, PKU 9440; one specimen, 180.2 mm SL, collected by stationary net, Ganggu-myeon, Yeongdeok-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea (36˚21′N, 129˚28′E), Jun 2014, PKU 11044.

Description. Disc laminae, 16; dorsal fin rays, 30; anal fin rays, 25-27; pectoral fin rays, 25; pelvic fin rays I, 5; vertebrae, 27; gill rakers 1 and 10 or 11 (Table 1).

Body stout and elongate (Fig. 1). Head flattened, with an oval and elongate sucking disc on the dorsal surface; sucking disc with 16 pairs of laminae; sucking disc does not extend to the posterior end of the pectoral fin. Scales of small and oval type, and irregularly arranged on body surface. Lower jaw rounded, protruding anteriorly; upper jaw pointed; both jaws with many rows of conical and curved teeth; posterior margin of upper jaw extending slightly beyond a line vertical to the anterior margin of the eye. Eyes small. Two pairs of nostrils; anterior nostrils smaller than posterior nostrils. Dorsal and anal fins without spines; origin of dorsal fin located more anterior than that of anal fin; posterior end of anal fin not reaching to posterior end of dorsal fin; pectoral fin rounded; origin of the pectoral fin anterior to origin of the pelvic fin. Lateral line starts at upper end of gill opening and reaches to base of caudal fin. Caudal peduncle stout; caudal fin slightly rounded (PKU 9440, PKU 11044).

Color. When fresh: body uniformly pale brown, except margins of fins are grayish to white. Head and body uniformly white (of PKU 11044) or brown (PKU 9440) (Fig. 1). In ethanol: color similar to that when fresh.

Distribution. Korea (present study); worldwide in warm waters (Lachner, 1986; O’Toole, 2002); New Zealand (Weber and de Beaufort, 1962; Paulin and Habib, 1982); Puerto Rico (Williams and Bunkley-Williams, 1996).

Remarks. The examined specimens belong to the genus Remora on the basis of body not elongate, pectoral fins rounded, and 18-28 anal fin soft rays (Carpenter, 2002). On the other hand, the other two genera occurring in Korea, Phtheirichthys, and Echeneis, are characterized by having a very elongate body, pectoral fins pointed, usually a dark longitudinal band on the sides, and 29-41 anal fin soft rays (Carpenter, 2002). The specimens were identified as R. brachyptera based on the sucking disc with 16 pairs of laminae, a total of 11-20 gill rakers, and 27-34 dorsal fin soft rays (Paulin and Habib, 1982; Carpenter, 2002; O’Toole, 2002; Hatooka and Kai, 2013). Remora brachyptera is similar to R. remora (Linnaeus, 1758) in having 27 vertebrae and 15-19 sucking disc pairs of laminae on the sucking disc, but differs from the latter in having a total of 10-16 gill rakers (vs. 28-37 in R. remora) (Paulin and Habib, 1982), the location of the dorsal fin origin before the anal fin origin (vs. corresponding to the anal fin origin in the R. remora), and truncate shape of the caudal fin (vs. forked in R. remora) (Carpenter, 2002).

The two specimens showed large differences in body color. Their heads and bodies were uniformly purple in PKU 9440 but uniformly white in PKU 11044; similar variations in color have been mentioned by Hatooka and Kai (2013). We propose the new Korean name “Meo-ri-ppal-pan-i” for R. brachyptera.

1*Remora osteochir (Cuvier, 1829) (Table 2, Fig. 2) (new Korean name: Ppyeo-dae-ppal-pan-i)

Table 2.Comparison of counts and measurements for Remora osteochir

Fig. 2.A, Remora osteochir (Cuvier, 1829); PKU 9646, standard length (SL), 241.5 mm; B, Laminae (dorsal view). Red arrows represent posterior end of the disc (a), posterior end of the pectoral fin (b), origin of the dorsal fin (c), and origin of the anal fin (d).

Echeneis osteochir Cuvier, 1829: 348 (type locality: Martinique Island, West Indies, western Atlantic); Bauchot and Desoutter, 1989: 13 (France).

Echeneis jacobaea Lowe, 1839: 89 (Portugal).

Echeneis musignani Costa, 1840: 9 (Mediterranean Sea); Vanni, 1991: 225 (Italy).

Echeneis tetrapturorum Poey, 1868: 256 (Cuba); Howell-Rivero, 1938: 216 (USA).

Echeneis pediculus Girard, 1893: 611 (Portugal).

Echeneis megalodiscus Franz, 1910: 69 (Japan); Neumann, 2006: 274 (Germany).

Remora osteochir: Lachner, 1973: 639 (north-eastern Atlantic, Mediterranean); Randall et al., 2005: 121 (Marshall Islands); McCosker and Rosenblatt, 2010: 192 (Galápagos Archipelago); Hatooka and Kai, 2013: 874 (Japan); Page et al., 2013: 146 (USA, Canada, and Mexico).

Material examined. PKU 9646, one specimen, 241.5 mm SL, collected by purse sein off southern Jeju Island, Korea (33˚39′N, 127˚13′E) in Aug 2013.

Description. Disc laminae, 18; dorsal fin rays, 25; anal fin rays, 24; pectoral fin rays, 22; pelvic fin rays I, 5; vertebrae, 27; gill rakers 2 and 13 (Table 2).

Body stout and elongate. Scales small and irregularly arranged over entire body surface. Head flattened and short. Sucking disc oval and elongate on dorsal surface. Eye moderately small. Lower jaw rounded, projecting past upper jaw; both jaws with many rows of conical and curved teeth; upper jaw does not extend to anterior margin of eye. Two pairs of nostrils; anterior nostril with a well-developed membranous rim; posterior nostril smaller than anterior nostril. Posterior end of sucking disc posterior to the posterior end of the pectoral fin. Pectoral fin obtuse; posterior end of pelvic fin extending beyond the posterior end of pectoral fin; shape of dorsal fin similar to anal fin; both dorsal and anal fins begin behind middle of body; dorsal and anal fins long and without spines; origin of dorsal fin located slightly anterior to that of anal fin; posterior end of anal fin not reaching to posterior end of dorsal fin; soft portions of dorsal and anal fins angular; pectoral fin rounded; origin of pectoral fin anterior to origin of pelvic fin; caudal peduncle slender; caudal fin truncated.

Color. When fresh: upper part of body blackish and lower part of body dark greyish; dorsal, anal, and caudal fins blackish; pectoral and pelvic fins dark greyish; iris dark brownish (Fig. 2). In ethanol: coloration shows no change after fixation.

Distribution. Korea (present study), worldwide in most tropical and subtropical pelagic environments (Lachner, 1986; O’Toole, 2002); Papua New Guinea and North Atlantic (Maul 1956; Paulin and Habib, 1982); Mediterranean (Tortonese, 1973); southeastern Aegean Sea (Kaspiris and Ondrias, 1984); Turkish waters, Aegean Sea (Tuncer et al., 2012); Japan (Hatooka and Kai, 2013).

Remarks. The examined specimen was identified as R. osteochir based on the presence of 18 disc laminae and a sucking disc extending well beyond the posterior end of the pectoral fin. Remora osteochir is easily distinguished from the four other Korean remoras by the location of the sucking disc (extending beyond the posterior end of the pectoral fin vs. not extending to the posterior end of the pectoral fin) (Hatooka and Kai, 2013). Remora osteochir is most similar to Remora australis (Bennett, 1840) in external shape, but differs in the number of disc laminae (18 in R. osteochir vs. 24-28 in R. australis) and total number of gill rakers (16 in R. osteochir vs. 17-20 in R. australis) (Carpenter, 2002). Therefore, we propose the new Korean name ‘Ppyeo-dae-ppal-pan-i’ for R. osteochir.

References

  1. Banon R, Villegas-Rios D, Serrano A, Mucientes G, Arronte JC, 2010. Marine fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an updated checklist. Zootaxa, 2667:1-27.
  2. Bauchot ML, Desoutter M, 1989. Critical catalog of type of fishes from the Natural Museum for Natural History: Percoidei suborder. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Section A, Zoologie, Biologie et Ecologie Animales, 11:1-58.
  3. Bennett FD, 1840. Narrative of a whaling voyage round the globe from the year 1833 to 1836. R. Bentley, London, pp. 1-822.
  4. Bleeker P, 1853. Diagnostische beschrijvingen van nieuwe of weinig bekende vischsoorten van Sumatra. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch-Indie, 4:243-302.
  5. Britz R, Johnson GD, 2012. Ontogeny and homology of the skeletal elements that form the sucking disc of remoras (Teleostei, Echeneoidei, Echeneidae). Journal of Morphology, 273:1353-1366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20063
  6. Carpenter KE, 2002. The living marine resources of the Western Central Atlantic. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 1-600.
  7. Costa OG, Costa A, 1840. Fauna del Regno di Napoli ossia Enumerazione di tutti gli animali che abitano le diverse regioni di questo regno e le acque che le bagnano contenente la descrizione de nuovi poco esattamente conosciuti. Napoli, pp. 1-8.
  8. Cuvier G, 1829. Le regne animal. distribue d'apres son organisalion, pour sevir de base a l'histoire naturelle des animaux et d'introduction a l'anatomie comparee. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Deterville, Paris, pp. 1-406.
  9. Dennis GD, Hensley D, Colin PL, Kimmel JJ, 2004. New records of marine fishes from the Puerto Rican Plateau. Caribbean Journal of Science, 40:70-87.
  10. Eydoux F, Gervais P, 1837. Voyage de la 'Favorite', poissons. Echeneis sexdecimlamellata et Syngnatus blainvillianus. Magazine Zoologique, 7:1-4.
  11. Franz V, 1910. Die Japonischen Knochenfische der Sammlungen Haberer und Doflein. Abhandlungen der Historischen Klasse der Koniglich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 4, Supply Board, 1:1-133.
  12. Gill T, 1862. Remarks on the relations of the genera and other groups of Cuban fishes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 14:235-242.
  13. Girard AA, 1893. Description d'un Echeneis nouveau des cotes du Portugal. Boletim da Sociedade de Geographia de Lisbon, 11:603-610.
  14. Gomon MF, Bray DJ, Kuiter RH, 2008. Fishes of Australia's southern coast. Museum Victoria, Melbourne, pp. 1-928.
  15. Gray KN, McDowell JR, Collette BB, Graves JE, 2009. A molecular phylogeny of the remoras and their relatives. Bulletin of Marine Science, 84:183-197.
  16. Hatooka K, Kai Y, 2013. Echeneidae. In: Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species (Ed., Nakabo T). 3rd ed. Tokai University Press, Kanagawa, pp. 872-874.
  17. Heemstra PC, 1986. Family Echeneidae. In: Smith's sea fishes (Eds., Smith MM, Heemstra PC). Springer-Verlag, Grahamstown, pp. 662-664.
  18. Howell-Rivero LUIS, 1938. List of the fishes, types of Poey, in the Museum of Comparative Zoology. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 82:169-227.
  19. Kaspiris P, Ondrias J, 1984. Some rare fishes from the Greek sea waters. Biljeske-Notes, 61:1-4.
  20. Lachner EA, 1973. Echeneididae. In: Check-list of the fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and of the Mediterranean (Eds., Hureau JC, Monod T). UNESCO, Paris, pp. 637-640.
  21. Lachner EA, 1986. Echeneididae. In: Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Vol. III (Eds., Whitehead PJP, Bauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E). UNESCO, Paris, pp. 1329-1334.
  22. Lee CL, Joo DS, 2006. First record of the remora, Phtheirichthys Lineatus (Perciformes: Echeneidae) from Korea. Korean Journal of Ichthyology, 18:59-61.
  23. Linnaeus C, 1758. Systema Naturae, edition X, Vol. 1 (Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata). Salvii, Holmiae, pp. 1-824.
  24. Lowe RT, 1839. A supplement to the synopsis of the fishes of Madeira. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 7:76-92.
  25. Maul GE, 1956. Monografia dos Peixes do Museu Municipal do Funchal. Ordem Discocephali. Buletim do Museum MuniCipal do Funchal, 9:5-75.
  26. McCosker JE, Rosenblatt RH, 2010. The fishes of the Galapagos Archipelago: an update. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences Series 4, 61:167-195.
  27. Menzies A, 1791. XXXI. Descriptions of three new animals found in the Pacific Ocean. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 1:187-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1791.tb00401.x
  28. Nakabo T, 2013. Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species. 3rd ed. Tokai University Press, Hadano, pp. 1-2530 (in Japanese).
  29. Nelson JS, 2006. Fishes of the world. 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, p. 431.
  30. Neumann D, 2006. Type catalogue of the ichthyological collection of the Zoologische Staatssammlung Munchen. Part I:Historic type material from the "Old Collection", destroyed in the night 24/25 April 1944. Spixiana, 29:259.
  31. O'Toole B, 2002. Phylogeny of the species of the superfamily Echeneoidea (Perciformes: Carangoidei: Echeneidae, Rachycentridae, and Coryphaenidae), with an interpretation of echeneid hitchhiking behaviour. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80:596-623. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-031
  32. Page LM, Espinosa-Perez H, Findley LT, Gilbert CR, Lea RN, Mandrak NE, Mayden RL, 2013. New seventh edition of common and scientific names of fishes: changes include capitalization of common names. Fisheries, 38:188-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2013.767244
  33. Paulin CD, Habib G, 1982. Remoras (Pisces: Echeneidae) from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 9:33-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1982.10423834
  34. Poey F, 1868. Memorias sobre la historia natural de la Isla de Cuba, acompanadas de sumarios Latinos y extractos en Frances. Vol. 2. Imprente de la Viuda de Barcina, Habana, pp. 413-415.
  35. Randall JE, Myers RF, Trevor MN, Johnson SR, Johnson JL, Yoshii S, Greene BD, 2005. Ninety-one new records of fishes from the Marshall Islands. Aqua, Journal of Ichthyology and Aquatic Biology, 9:115-132.
  36. Storer DH, 1839. A report on the fishes of Massachusetts. Boston Journal of Natural History, 2:289-558.
  37. Temminck CJ, Schlegel H, 1850. Description des oiseaux observés au Japon par les voyageurs hollandois (partim) (Ed., Siebold TF). Fauna japonica. A. Arnz and Socios, Lugduni Batavorum, Leiden, pp. 1-141.
  38. Tortonese E, 1973. Les poissons de la famille Echeneididae (Remoras) de la mer Ligure et de la mer Tyrrhenienne. Revue des Travaux de l'Institut des Peches Maritimes, 37:197-202.
  39. Tuncer S, Orlov AM, Ozen O, 2012. First record of marlin sucker, Remora osteochir (Cuvier, 1829), from the northeastern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Ichthyology, 52:400-408. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945212040145
  40. Vanni S, 1991. Cataloghi del Museo Zoologico "La Specola" dell'Universita di Firenze. VIII. Osteichthyes: tipi. Atti della Società Toscana di Scienze Nataurali Residente in Pisa, Memorie, Serie B, 97:219-230.
  41. Weber MCW, de Beaufort LF, 1962. The fishes of the Indo-Australian archipelago. Vol. 11. Brill Archive, Leiden, pp. 1-438.
  42. Williams EH, Bunkley-Williams L, 1996. Parasites of off shore, big game sport fishes of Puerto Rico and the Western North Atlantic. Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, pp. 1-384.
  43. Wirtz P, Brito A, Falcón JM, Freitas R, Fricke R, Monteiro V, Reiner F, Tariche O, 2013. The coastal fishes of the Cape Verde Islands: new records and an annotated check-list (Pisces). Spixiana, 36:113-142.