Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quantification of Pediatric Cervical Growth : Anatomical Changes in the Sub-Axial Spine

  • Lee, Ho Jin (Department of Neurosurgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jung Jae (Department of Neurosurgery, Cheongju St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Jae Taek (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jong Tae (Department of Neurosurgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2014.06.11
  • Accepted : 2014.11.25
  • Published : 2015.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : In order to provide normal values of the pediatric sub-axial cervical spinal canal and vertebral body growth pattern using computed tomographic scans, a total of 318 patients less than 10 years old were included. Methods : The growth of the vertebral body and canal space was investigated using four different age groups. The Torg ratio (TR) was calculated and all patients were classified into a low TR group and a high TR group according to a cutoff value of 1.0. To account for spinal curvature, the C3-7 angle was measured. Results : Very little axial expansion and growth in height were observed (2.9 mm and 3.4 mm, respectively), and the spinal canal increments (1.8 mm) were much smaller than the dimensions of the vertebral body. The mean TR values were $1.03{\pm}0.14$ at the C3 vertebral level, $1.02{\pm}0.13$ at C4, $1.05{\pm}0.13$ at C5, $1.04{\pm}0.13$ at C6, and $1.02{\pm}0.12$ at C7 in all patients. The mean sub-axial angle (C3-7) was $7.9{\pm}10.6^{\circ}$ (range: $-17-47^{\circ}$). Conclusion : The upper sub-axial spinal canal continuously increased in size compared to the lower sub-axial spine after 8 years of age. Considerable decrements in the TR was found after late childhood compared to younger ages. Generally, there were no significant differences between boys and girls in vertical length of the cervical vertebrae. However, the axial dimension of the vertebral body and the spinal canal space varied according to gender.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Mroz TE : Morphometric and volumetric analysis of the lateral masses of the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : 1476-1479, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a8f649
  2. Bailey DK : The normal cervical spine in infants and children. Radiology 59 : 712-719, 1952 https://doi.org/10.1148/59.5.712
  3. Cattell HS, Filtzer DL : Pseudosubluxation and other normal variations in the cervical spine in children. A study of one hundred and sixty children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 47 : 1295-1309, 1965 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196547070-00001
  4. Dubousset J, Herring JA, Shufflebarger H : The crankshaft phenomenon. J Pediatr Orthop 9 : 541-550, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198909010-00008
  5. Evangelopoulos D, Kontovazenitis P, Kouris S, Zlatidou X, Benneker L, Vlamis J, et al. : Computerized tomographic morphometric analysis of the cervical spine. Open Orthop J 6 : 250-254, 2012 https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001206010250
  6. Fesmire FM, Luten RC : The pediatric cervical spine : developmental anatomy and clinical aspects. J Emerg Med 7 : 133-142, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(89)90258-8
  7. Goto S, Umehara J, Aizawa T, Kokubun S : Comparison of cervical spinal canal diameter between younger and elder generations of Japanese. J Orthop Sci 15 : 97-103, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1427-7
  8. Hashimoto I, Tak YK : The true sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal and its diagnostic significance in cercical myelopathy. J Neurosurg 47 : 912-916, 1977 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1977.47.6.0912
  9. Hukuda S, Kojima Y : Sex discrepancy in the canal/body ratio of the cervical spine implicating the prevalence of cervical myelopathy in men. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 250-253, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200202010-00009
  10. Kanna PR, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S : Anatomical feasibility of pediatric cervical pedicle screw insertion by computed tomographic morphometric evaluation of 376 pediatric cervical pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 : 1297-1304, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fb3c17
  11. Kasai T, Ikata T, Katoh S, Miyake R, Tsubo M : Growth of the cervical spine with special reference to its lordosis and mobility. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 2067-2073, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199609150-00003
  12. Kokubun S, Sato T, Ishii Y, Tanaka Y : Cervical myelopathy in the Japanese. Clin Orthop Relat Res (323) : 129-138, 1996
  13. Lim JK, Wong HK : Variation of the cervical spinal Torg ratio with gender and ethnicity. Spine J 4 : 396-401, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.011
  14. Matveeva N, Janevski P, Nakeva N, Zhivadinovik J, Dodevski A : Morphometric analysis of the cervical spinal canal on MRI. Prilozi 34 : 97-103, 2013
  15. Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K : Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 : 861-869, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199108000-00001
  16. Parenteau CS, Wang NC, Zhang P, Caird MS, Wang SC : Quantification of pediatric and adult cervical vertebra-anatomical characteristics by age and gender for automotive application. Traffic Inj Prev 15 : 572-582, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2013.843774
  17. Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, Jahre C : Cervical spinal stenosis : determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology 164 : 771-775, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.164.3.3615879
  18. Penning L : Some aspects of plain radiography of the cervical spine in chronic myelopathy. Neurology 12 : 513-519, 1962
  19. Rajasekaran S, Kanna PR, Shetty AP : Safety of cervical pedicle screw insertion in children : a clinicoradiological evaluation of computer-assisted insertion of 51 cervical pedicle screws including 28 subaxial pedicle screws in 16 children. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37 : E216-E223, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318231bb81
  20. Sasaki T, Kadoya S, Iizuka H : Roentgenological study of the sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in normal adult Japanese. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 38 : 83-88; discussion 88-89, 1998
  21. Solanki GA, Lo WB, Hendriksz CJ : MRI morphometric characterisation of the paediatric cervical spine and spinal cord in children with MPS IVA (Morquio-Brailsford syndrome). J Inherit Metab Dis 36 : 329-337, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-013-9585-3
  22. Stemper BD, Pintar FA, Rao RD : The influence of morphology on cervical injury characteristics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 (25 Suppl) : S180-S186, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182387d98
  23. Ulbrich EJ, Schraner C, Boesch C, Hodler J, Busato A, Anderson SE, et al. : Normative MR cervical spinal canal dimensions. Radiology 271 : 172-182, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120370
  24. Vara CS, Thompson GH : A cadaveric examination of pediatric cervical pedicle morphology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 1107-1112, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000216591.47505.17

Cited by

  1. Morphometric analysis of the developing pediatric cervical spine vol.18, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.3.peds1612
  2. Cervical Facet Orientation Varies with Age in Children : An MRI Study vol.100, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.00979
  3. SOF System; A New Nomenclature System for the Surgical Techniques of Cervical Spine Deformity vol.17, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040472.236