References
- Beven, K. (2001), Revisiting the problem of model choice in Rainfall-runoff modeling: The primer, Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 297-306
- Beven, K. (2002), Towards an alternative blueprint for a physicallybased digitally simulated hydrologic response modeling system, Hydrological Processes, Vol. 16, No. 2, 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.343
- Beven, K. (2006), A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 320, pp. 18-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
- Beven, K. and Binley, A. M. (1992), The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrological Processes, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305
- Beven, K. and Freer, J. (2001), Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 249, pp. 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8
- Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V. and Sorooshian, S. (2000), Toward improved calibration of hydrological models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resources Research, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 3663-3674. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900207
- Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Koren, V., Zhang, Z. and Smith, M. (2001), Toward improved streamflow forecast: The value of semi-distributed modeling, Water Resources Research, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 2739-2759.
- Duan, Q., Gupta, V. K. and Sorooshian, S. (1993), Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939380
- Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S. and Gupta, V. K. (1992), Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resources Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1015-1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985
- Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S. and Gupta, V. K. (1994), Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 158, pp. 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4
- Feyen, L., Vrugt, J. A., Nualláin, B. Ó., Knijff, J. and Roo, A. D. (2007), Parameter optimization and uncertainty assessment for large-scale streamflow simulation with the LISFLOOD model, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 332, pp. 276-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.004
- Freer, J., Beven, K. and Ambroise, B. (1996), Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of GLUE approach, Water Resources Research, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 2161-2173. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR03723
- Gan, T. Y., Dlamini, E. M. and Biftu, G. F. (1997), Effects of model complexity and structure data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 192, pp. 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03114-9
- Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B. (1992), Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statistical Science, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136
- Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Hogue, T. S. and Boyle, D. P. (2003), Advances in automatic calibration of watershed models, in Advances in calibration of watershed models, edited by Q. Duan, S. Sorooshian, H.V. Gupta, Rosseau, A. and R. Turcotte, Washington, AGU, pp. 9-28.
- Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S. and Yapo, P. O. (1998), Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resources Research, Vol. 134, No. 4, pp. 751-763.
- Ichikawa, Y., Shiiba, M., Tachikawa, Y. and Takara, K. (2000), Object-oriented hydrological modeling system, Proceeding of 4th International Conference Hydro- informatics 2000 CD-ROM, Iowa, pp. 8-15.
- Jakeman, A. J. and Hornberger, G. M. (1993), How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?, Water Resources Research, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 2637-2649. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00877
- Kuczera, G. and Parent, E. (1998), Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 211, pp. 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00198-X
- Refsgaard, J. C. and Knudsen J. (1996), Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrologic models, Water Resources Research, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 2189-2202. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00896
- Sorooshian, S. and Dracup, J. A. (1980), Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologic rainfall-runoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases, Water Resources Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 430-442. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i002p00430
- Spear, R. C. and Hornberger, G. M. (1980), Eutrophication in Peel Inlet - Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis, Water Research, Vol. 14, pp. 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90040-8
- Tachikawa, Y., Nagatani, G. and Takara, K. (2004), Development of stage-discharge relationship equation incorporating saturatedunsaturated flow mechanism, Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 48, pp. 7-12 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/prohe.48.7
- Takasao, T. and Shiiba, M. (1988), Incorporation of the effect of concentration of flow into the kinematic wave equations and its applications to runoff system lumping, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 102, pp. 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(88)90104-7
- Takasao, T., Shiiba, M. and Ichikawa, Y. (1996), A runoff simulation with structural hydrological modeling system, Journal of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 47-55.
- Uhlenbrook, S., Seibert, J., Leibundgut, C. and Rohde, A. (1999), Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems in identifying model parameters and structures, Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 779-797. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669909492273
- Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W. and Sorooshian, S. (2003), A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resources Research, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 1-14.
- Wagener, T. (2003), Evaluation of catchment models, Hydrological Processes, Vol. 17, pp. 3375-3378. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5158
- Wagener, T., Boyle, D. P., Leeds, M. J., Wheater, H. S., Gupta, H. V. and Sorooshian, S. (2001), A framework for development and application of hydrological models, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 5, pp. 13-26. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-13-2001
- Wagener, T. and Gupta H. V. (2005), Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 19, pp. 378-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0006-5
- Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S. and Gupta, H. V. (2003a), Identification of Watershed Models in Advances in calibration of watershed models, edited by Q. Duan, S. Sorooshian, H.V. Gupta, Rosseau, A. and R. Turcotte, Washington, AGU, pp. 29-47.
- Wagener, T., Leeds, M. J., Wheater, H. S. and Gupta, H. V. (2003b), Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfallrunoff modeling: dynamic identifiability analysis. Hydrological Processes, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 455-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1135
- Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S. and Gupta, H. V. (2004), Rainfallrunoff modeling in gauged and ungauged catchments, London, Imperial College Press, 306 pp.
- Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V. and Sorooshian, S. (1998), Multiobjective global optimization for hydrologic models, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 204, pp. 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00107-8
- Yu, P. S., Yang, T. C. and Chen, S. J. (2001), Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall-runoff model, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 244, pp. 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00328-6