Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hybrid PSO and SSO algorithm for truss layout and size optimization considering dynamic constraints

  • Kaveh, A. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Bakhshpoori, T. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Afshari, E. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2014.05.03
  • Accepted : 2014.11.11
  • Published : 2015.05.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A hybrid approach of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Swallow Swarm Optimization algorithm (SSO) namely Hybrid Particle Swallow Swarm Optimization algorithm (HPSSO), is presented as a new variant of PSO algorithm for the highly nonlinear dynamic truss shape and size optimization with multiple natural frequency constraints. Experimentally validation of HPSSO on four benchmark trusses results in high performance in comparison to PSO variants and to those of different optimization techniques. The simulation results clearly show a good balance between global and local exploration abilities and consequently results in good optimum solution.

Keywords

References

  1. Eberhart, R.C. and Shi, Y. (2000), "Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization", Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 84-88.
  2. Gomes, H.M. (2011), "Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm", Expert Syst. Appl., 38(1), 957-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.086
  3. Grandhi, R.V. (1993), "Structural optimization with frequency constraints-a review", AIAA J., 31(12), 2296-2303. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11928
  4. Grandhi, R.V. and Venkayya, V.B. (1988), "Structural optimization with frequency constraints", AIAA J., 26, 858-866. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9979
  5. Gholizadeh, S. and Barzegar, A., (2013), "Shape optimization of structures for frequency constraints by sequential harmony search algorithm", Eng. Optim., 45(6), 627-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2012.704028
  6. Kaveh, A. (2014), Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
  7. Kaveh, A. and Bakhshpoori, T. (2013), "Optimum design of space trusses using cuckoo search algorithm with Levy flights", IJST, Tran. Civil. Eng., 37(C1), 1-15.
  8. Kaveh, A., Bakhshpoori, T. and Afshary, E. (2014), "An efficient hybrid particle swarm and swallow swarm optimization algorithm", Comput. Struct., 143, 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.07.012
  9. Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A. (2011), "Shape and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints using enhanced charged system search algorithm", Asian J. Civil Eng., 12(4), 487-509.
  10. Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A. (2013), "Topology optimization of trusses considering static and dynamic constraints using the CSS", Appl. Soft Comput., 13(5), 2727-2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.014
  11. Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A. (2014), "Democratic PSO for truss layout and size optimization with frequency constraints", Comput. Struct., 130, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.09.002
  12. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. (2011), Swarm Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
  13. Khot, N.S. (1985), "Optimization of structures with multiple frequency constraints", Comput. Struct., 20, 869-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(85)90006-9
  14. Lingyun, W., Mei, Z., Guangming, W. and Guang, M. (2005), "Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on genetic algorithm", Comput. Mech., 25, 361-368.
  15. Lingyun, W., Tianbing, T., Xianghong, X. and Wenjie, S. (2011), "Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on parallel genetic algorithm", Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 43, 665-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0600-0
  16. Miguel, L.F.F. and Miguel, L.F.F. (2012), "Shape and size optimization of truss structures considering dynamic constraints through modern meta-heuristic algorithms", Expert Syst. Appl., 39(10), 9458-9467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.113
  17. Neshat M., Sepidnam, G. and Sargolzaei, M. (2013), "Swallow swarm optimization algorithm: a new method to optimization", Neural. Comput. Applic., 23, 429-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0939-9
  18. Sedaghati, R., Suleman, A. and Tabarrok, B. (2002), "Structural optimization with frequency constraints using finite element force method", AIAA J., 40, 382-388. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1657
  19. Tong, W.H. and Liu, G.R. (2001), "An optimization procedure for truss structure with discrete design variables and dynamic constraints", Comput. Struct., 79, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00124-3
  20. Wang, D., Zhang, W.H. and Jiang, J.S. (2004), "Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints", AIAA J., 42, 622-630. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.1711
  21. Zuo, W., Xu, T., Zhang, H. and Xu, T. (2011), "Fast structural optimization with frequency constraints by genetic algorithm using adaptive eigenvalue reanalysis methods", Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 43, 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0610-y

Cited by

  1. Robust optimization of reinforced concrete folded plate and shell roof structure incorporating parameter uncertainty vol.56, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.5.707
  2. Optimum design of steel floor system: effect of floor division number, deck thickness and castellated beams vol.59, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.5.933
  3. Proposing optimum parameters of TMDs using GSA and PSO algorithms for drift reduction and uniformity vol.63, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.2.147
  4. A new hybrid optimization algorithm based on path projection vol.65, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.6.707