수완나부미 (SUVANNABHUMI)

  • 제7권1호
  • /
  • Pages.13-57
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2092-738X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-7839(eISSN)
부산외대 아세안연구원 (Korea Institute for ASEAN Studies)
권호 표지

Southeast Asia and Southeast Asian Studies: Issues in Multidisciplinary Studies and Methodology

  • King, Victor T. (Center for Ethnic Studies and Development, Chiang Mai University, University of Leeds)
  • 투고 : 2015.04.13
  • 심사 : 2015.06.01
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The paper brings together several strands of debate and deliberation in which I have been involved since the early 2000s on the definition of Southeast Asia and the rationale of Southeast Asian Studies. I refer to the relationship between area studies and methodologies as a conundrum (or puzzle), though I should state from the outset that I think it is much more of a conundrum for others than for me. I have not felt the need to pose the question of whether or not area studies generates a distinctive method or set of methods and research practices, because I operate from a disciplinary perspective; though that it is not to say that the question should not be posed. Indeed, as I have earned a reputation for "revisionism" and championing disciplinary approaches rather than regional ones, it might be anticipated already the position that I take in an examination of the relationships between methodologies and the practice of "area studies" (and in this case Southeast Asian [or Asian] Studies). Nevertheless, given the recent resurgence of interest in the possibilities provided by the adoption of regional perspectives and the grounding of data gathering and analysis within specified locations in the context of globalization, the issues raised for researchers working in Southeast Asia and within the field of Southeast Asian Studies require revisiting.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ananda Rajah. 1999. Southeast Asia: Comparatist Errors and the Construction of a Region, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, Special Focus: Reconceptualizing Southeast Asia, Amitav Acharya and Ananda Rajah (eds), 27: 41-53.
  2. Andaya, Barbara Watson. 1997. The Unity of Southeast Asia: Historical Approaches and Questions. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 28: 161-171.
  3. Anderson, Benedict. 1992. The Changing Ecology of Southeast Asian Studies in the United States. Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America. Charles Hirschman, Charles F. Keyes and Karl Hutterer eds. 25-40. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The Association for Asian Studies.
  4. Barnett, Tony and Piers Blaikie. 1994. On Ignoring the Wider Picture: AIDS Research and the Jobbing Social Scientist. Rethinking Social Development. David Booth ed. 226-250. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical.
  5. Bonura, Carlo and Laurie J. Sears. 2007. Introduction: Knowledges that Travel in Southeast Asian Area Studies. Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects. Laurie J. Sears, ed. 3-34. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, and Singapore: NUS Press.
  6. Bowen, John R. 1995. The Forms Culture takes: a State-of-thefield Essay on the Anthropology of Southeast Asia. The Journal of Asian Studies, 54: 1047-1078.
  7. Bowen, John R. 2000. The Inseparability of Area and Ddiscipline in Southeast Asian Studies: a View from the United States. Moussons. Recherche en sciences humaines sur l'Asie du Sud-Est, 1: 3-19.
  8. Bowen, John R. 2004. The Contributions of Southeast Asian Studies in the United States. The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. David L. Szanton, ed. 386-427. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  9. Burgess, Chris. 2004. The Asian Studies "Crisis": Putting Cultural Studies into Asian Studies and Asia into Cultural Studies. International Journal of Asian Studies, 1: 121-136.
  10. Caplan, Pat, ed. 2003. The Ethics of Anthropology. Debates and Dilemmas. London and New York: Routledge.
  11. Chou, Cynthia and Vincent Houben, eds. 2006a. Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Directions. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, and Leiden: International Institute for Asian Studies.
  12. Chou, Cynthia and Vincent Houben, eds. 2006b. Introduction. Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Directions. Cynthia Chou and Vincent Houben, eds. 1-22. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, and Leiden: International Institute for Asian Studies.
  13. Chua Beng Huat. 2014. Inter-referencing Southeast Asia: Absence, Resonance and Provocation. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Mikko Huotari, Jurgen Ruland and Judith Schlehe, eds. 273-288. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Dick, Howard. 2005. Southeast Asia as an Open System: Geo-politics and Economic Geography. Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space. Paul H. Kratoska, Remco Raben and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds. 2005a. Singapore: Singapore University Press, and Ohio: Ohio University Press, Research in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, No. 111, 250-274.
  15. Edmond, Jacob, Henry Johnson and Jacqueline Leckie, eds. 2011a. Recentring Asia; Histories, Encounters, Identities, Leiden and Boston: Global Oriental.
  16. Edmond, Jacob, Henry Johnson and Jacqueline Leckie, eds. 2011b. Introduction. Recentring Asia; Histories, Encounters, Identities. Jacob Edmond, Henry Johnson and Jacqueline Leckie, eds. 1-9. Leiden and Boston: Global Oriental.
  17. Ellen, R.F., ed. 1984. Ethnographic Research. A Guide to General Conduct. London and San Diego: Academic Press, Research Methods in Social Anthropology 1.
  18. Evans, Grant. 2002. Between the Global and the Local there are Regions, Culture Areas and National States: a Review Article. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 33: 147-161.
  19. Fifield, Russell H. 1976. Southeast Asian Studies: Origins, Development, Future. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 7: 154-61.
  20. Fifield, Russell H. 1983. Southeast Asia as a Regional Concept. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 11: 1-14.
  21. Goh Beng Lan, ed. 2011a. Disciplines and Area Studies in the Global Age: Southeast Asian Reflections. Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the Region. Goh Beng Lan, ed. 1-59. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
  22. Goh Beng Lan, ed. 2011b. Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the Region. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  23. Goh Beng Lan, ed. 2014. Moving Theory and Methods in Southeast Asian Studies. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Mikko Huotari, Jurgen Ruland and Judith Schlehe, eds. 27-43. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. Goss, Jon and Terence Wesley-Smith. 2010. Introduction: Remaking Area Studies. Remaking Area Studies: Teaching and Learning across Asia and the Pacific. Terence Wesley-Smith and Jon Goss, eds. ix-xxvii. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  25. Harris, Olivia. 1996. The Temporalities of Tradition: Reflections on a Changing Anthropology. Grasping the Changing World: Anthropological Concepts in a Postmodern Era. Vaclav Hubinger, ed. 1-16. London and New York: Routledge.
  26. Heryanto, Ariel. 2002. Can There be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies? Moussons. Recherche en sciences humaines sur l'Asie du Sud-Est, 5: 3-30.
  27. Heryanto, Ariel. 2007. Can There be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies? Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects. Laurie J. Sears, ed. 75-108. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, and Singapore: NUS Press.
  28. Hirschman, Charles. 1992. The State of Southeast Asian Studies in American Universities. Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America. Charles Hirschman, Charles F. Keyes and Karl Hutterer, eds. 41-58. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The Association for Asian Studies.
  29. Hirschman, Charles and Jennifer Edwards. 2007. Social Change, Southeast Asia. The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Sociology, vol. 9. George Ritzer, ed. 4374-4380. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  30. Holy, Ladislav. 1984. Theory, Anthropology and the Research Process. Ethnographic Research. A Guide to General Conduct, R.F. Ellen, ed. 13-34. London and San Diego: Academic Press, Research Methods in Social Anthropology 1.
  31. Mikko Huotari. 2014. Introduction: Fostering Methodological Dialogue in Southeast Asian Studies. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Mikko Huotari, Jurgen Ruland and Judith Schlehe, eds. 1-24. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  32. Mikko Huotari, Jurgen Ruland and Judith Schlehe, eds. 2014. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Jackson, Peter, A. 2003a. Space, Theory, and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies. Sojourn. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 18: 1-41.
  34. Jackson, Peter, A., 2003b. Mapping Poststructuralism's Borders: The Case for Poststructuralist Area Studies. Sojourn. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 18: 42-88.
  35. Kessler, Clive S. 2012. Globalisation: Familiar Issues But a New-fangled Discourse - or "Deja Vu All over Again?" Social Science and Knowledge in a Globalising World. Zawawi Ibrahim, ed. 23-50. Kajang: Malaysian Social Science Association and Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
  36. Keyes, Charles F. 1992. A Conference at Wingspread and Rethinking Southeast Asian Studies. Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America. Charles Hirschman, Charles F. Keyes and Karl Hutterer, eds. 9-24. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The Association for Asian Studies.
  37. King, Victor T. 1990. Between West and East: Policy and Practice in South-East Asian Studies in Britain. Hull: Hull University Press.
  38. King, Victor T. 1994. Reflections of a Jobbing Social Scientist Twenty Years On. The Sarawak Gazette, 121: 15-19.
  39. King, Victor T. 1999. Anthropology and Development in South-East Asia: Theory and Practice. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
  40. King, Victor T. 2001. Southeast Asia: an Anthropological Field of Study? Moussons. Recherche en Sciences humaines sur l'Asie du Sud-Est, 3: 3-31.
  41. King, Victor T. 2005. Defining Southeast Asia and the Crisis in Area Studies: Personal Reflections on a Region. Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, University of Lund: Working Paper no. 13.
  42. King, Victor T. 2006a. Review of 'Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space', edited by Paul H. Kratoska, Remco Raben and Henk Schulte Nordholt, ASEASUK News, 39: 16-19.
  43. King, Victor T. 2006b. Southeast Asia: Personal Reflections on a Region. Cynthia Chou and Vincent Houben, eds. 23-44. Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Directions. Singapore, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, and Leiden, International Institute of Asian Studies.
  44. King, Victor T. 2008/2011. The Sociology of Southeast Asia: Transformations in a Developing Region. Copenhagen: NIAS Press and Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, reprint 2011.
  45. King, Victor T. 2009a. A History of ASEASUK: On its Fortieth Anniversary. School of Oriental and African Studies: Association of South-East Asian Studies in the United Kingdom.
  46. King, Victor T. 2009b. Borneo Studies: Perspectives from a Jobbing Social Scientist. Akademika, 77: 15-40.
  47. King, Victor T. 2010. The Development of Southeast Asian Studies in the UK: the Making of a Region, Proceedings of the 2010 SIEAS International Conference of Research Clusters, The Historical Construction of Southeast Asia. Seoul: Sogang Institute of East Asian Studies, 29-31 March, 2010, 131-182.
  48. King, Victor T. 2011. The Development of Southeast Asian Studies in the United Kingdom (and Europe): the Making of a Region. Leeds East Asia Papers, New Series No. 3, e-series.
  49. King, Victor T. 2012a. Review Essay. The Problem with Areas: Asia and Area Studies. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 168: 314-324.
  50. King, Victor T. 2012b. Knowledge from the Margins of Malaysia: Globalisation and Research on the Ground. Social Science and Knowledge in a Globalising World. Zawawi Ibrahim, ed. 117-164. Kajang: Malaysian Social Science Association and Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
  51. King, Victor T. 2013. British Perspectives on Southeast Asia and Continental European Comparisons: the Making of a Region. The Historical Construction of Southeast Asian Studies. Korea and Beyond. Park Seung Woo and Victor T. King, eds. 265-323. Singapore: ISEAS Press.
  52. King, Victor T. 2014. Southeast Asian Studies: The Conundrum of Area and Method. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Mikko Huotari, Jurgen Ruland and Judith Schlehe, eds. 44-63. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  53. King, Victor T. and William D. Wilder. 2003/2006. The Modern Anthropology of South-East Asia. An Introduction, London: Routledge, reprint 2006.
  54. Korff, Ruediger and Susanne Schroter. 2006. Current Ttrends in Anthropological and Sociological Research in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 25: 63-72.
  55. Kratoska, Paul H., Remco Raben and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds. 2005a. Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space. Singapore: Singapore University Press, and Ohio: Ohio University Press, Research in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, No. 111.
  56. Kratoska, Paul H., Remco Raben and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds. 2005b. Locating Southeast Asia. Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space. Paul H. Kratoska, Remco Raben and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds. 1-19. Singapore: Singapore University Press, and Ohio: Ohio University Press, Research in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, No. 111.
  57. Kuijper, Hans. 2008. Area Studies versus Disciplines. Towards an Interdisciplinary, Systemic Country Approach. The International Journal of interdisciplinary Social Science, 3 (7): 205-216.
  58. Lieberman, Victor. 1993. Local Integration and Eurasian Analogies: Structuring Southeast Asian History. c.1350-c.1830, Modern Asian Studies, 27: 475-572.
  59. Lieberman, Victor. 1995. An Age of Commerce in Southeast Asia? Problems of Regional Coherence - A Review Article. The Journal of Asian Studies, 54: 796-807.
  60. Lombard, Denys. 1995. Networks and Synchronisms in Southeast Asian History. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26:10-16.
  61. McVey, Ruth T. 1995. Change and Continuity in Southeast Asian Studies. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26: 1-9.
  62. McVey, Ruth T. 1998. Globalization, Marginalization, and the Study of Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Studies: Reorientations. Craig J. Reynolds and Ruth McVey, eds. 37-64. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program Publications.
  63. McVey, Ruth T. 2005. Afterword: In Praise of the Coelacanth's Cousin. Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space. Paul H. Kratoska, Remco Raben and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds. 308-319. Singapore: Singapore University Press, and Ohio: Ohio University Press, Research in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, No. 111.
  64. Milner, Anthony. 1999. Approaching Asia, and Asian Studies, in Australia. Asian Studies Review, 23: 193-203.
  65. Ooi Keat Gin, ed. 2004. Southeast Asia: a Historical Encyclopedia from Angkor Wat to East Timor. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 3 volumes.
  66. Park Seung Woo and Victor T. King, eds. 2013. The Historical Construction of Southeast Asian Studies. Korea and Beyond. Singapore: ISEAS Press.
  67. Quinlan, Tim. 1996. Circumscribing the Environment: Sustainable Development, Ethnography and Applied Anthropology in Southern Africa. Grasping the Changing World: Anthropological Concepts in a Postmodern Era. Vaclav Hubinger, ed. 74-99. London and New York: Routledge.
  68. Reid, Anthony. 1988/1993. Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce: 1400-1680, Vol. 1, The Land Below the Winds; Vol. 2, Expansion and Crisis. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  69. Reid, Anthony. 1994. Recent Trends towards Future Directions in Southeast Asian Studies (Outside SE Asia). Towards the Promotion of Southeast Asian Studies in Southeast Asia. T. Abdullah and Y. Manuati, eds. 256-276. Jakarta: Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
  70. Reid, Anthony. 1999. A Saucer Model of Southeast Asian Identity. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, Special Focus: Reconceptualizing Southeast Asia, Amitav Acharya and Ananda Rajah, eds. 27: 7-23.
  71. Reid, Anthony., ed. 2003a. Southeast Asian Studies: Pacific Perspectives. Tempe, Arizona State University: Arizona Monograph Series Press, Program for Southeast Asian Studies.
  72. Reid, Anthony. 2003b. Introduction. Southeast Asian Studies: Decline or Rebirth? Southeast Asian Studies: Pacific Perspectives. Anthony Reid, ed. 1-23. Tempe, Arizona State University: Arizona Monograph Series Press, Program for Southeast Asian Studies.
  73. Reynolds, Craig J. 1995. A New Look at Old Southeast Asia. The Journal of Asian Studies, 54: 419-446.
  74. Robinson, Kathryn. 2014. What Does a Gender Relations Approach Bring to Southeast Asian Studies? Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Mikko Huotari, Jurgen Ruland and Judith Schlehe, eds. 107-127. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  75. Saw Swee-Hock and John Wong. 2007. Southeast Asian Studies in China. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
  76. Schafer, Wolf. 2010. Reconfiguring Area Studies for the Global Age. Globality Studies Journal, Global History, Society, Civilization, no 22, December 31 (https://globality cc.stonybrook.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/no.22.pdf)
  77. Schippers, Thomas K. 1995. A History of Paradoxes. Anthropologies of Europe. Fieldwork and Footnotes: Studies in the History of European Anthropology. Han F. Vermeulen and Arturo Alvarez Roldan, eds. 234-246. London and New York: Routledge.
  78. Schlehe, Judith and Sita Hidayah. 2014. Transcultural Ethnography: Reciprocity in Indonesian-German Tandem Research. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Mikko Huotari, Jurgen Ruland and Judith Schlehe, eds. 253-272. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  79. Sears, Laurie J. 2007. Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, and Singapore: NUS Press.
  80. Shamsul Amri Baharuddin. 1994. A Comment on Recent Trends and the Future Direction of Southeast Asian Studies. Towards the Promotion of Southeast Asian Studies in Southeast Asia. T. Abdullah and Y. Manuati, eds. 277-296. Jakarta: Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
  81. Simandjuntak, Deasy and Michaela Haug. 2014. Doing Anthropological Fieldwork with Southeast Asian Characteristics? Identity and Adaptation in the Field. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Mikko Huotari, Jurgen Ruland and Judith Schlehe, eds. 67-90. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  82. Steedly, Mary. 1999. The State of Culture Theory in the Anthropology of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28: 431-454.
  83. Sutherland, Heather. 2005. Contingent Devices. Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space. Paul H. Kratoska, Remco Raben and Henk Schulte Nordholt, eds. 20-59. Singapore: Singapore University Press, and Ohio: Ohio University Press, Research in International Studies, Southeast Asia Series, No. 111.
  84. Szanton, David L. 2004a. The Origin, Nature, and Challenges of Area Studies in the Uunited States. The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. David L. Szanton, ed. 1-33. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  85. Szanton, David L., ed. 2004b. The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  86. Teiawa, Teresia K. 2010. For or Before an Asian Pacific Studies Agenda? Specifying Pacific Studies. Remaking Area Studies; Teaching and Learning across Asia and the Pacific. Terence Wesley-Smith and Jon Goss, eds. 110-124. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  87. Wesley-Smith, Terence and Jon Goss, eds. 2010. Remaking Area Studies; Teaching and Learning across Asia and the Pacific. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  88. Wolters, O.W. 1999. History, Culture and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program Publications, Studies on Southeast Asia, No. 26; revised edition in cooperation with the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies; originally published by the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, 1982.