대한산업공학회지 (Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)

  • 제41권2호
  • /
  • Pages.144-149
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1225-0988(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6457(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

체계개발 사업의 효과적인 기술성숙도 평가방법에 대한 연구

A Study on The Effective Technology Readiness Assessment Method for System Development Project

  • 김현우 (발사체임무보증실 한국항공우주연구원) ;
  • 고정환 (발사체임무보증실 한국항공우주연구원) ;
  • 정의승 (발사체임무보증실 한국항공우주연구원)
  • Kim, Hyun Woo (Launcher Mission Assurance Division, Korea Aerospace Research Institute) ;
  • Ko, Jeong Hwan (Launcher Mission Assurance Division, Korea Aerospace Research Institute) ;
  • Chung, Eui Seung (Launcher Mission Assurance Division, Korea Aerospace Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2014.07.15
  • 심사 : 2015.01.05
  • 발행 : 2015.04.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, the effective technology readiness assessment (TRA) method for system development project is suggested. We analyze the domestic and foreign TRA practice and derive the new idea to resolve the problems found from the analysis. Domestic and foreign organizations develop and use checklist for the precise TRA, but the checklist has some problems in type of questions and analysis of assessment. TRA method using the original TRL definition or the checklist should be selected depending on the project characteristic. Questions of the checklist should be classified into critical or non-critical according to their importance. Finally, Test and evaluation master plan (TEMP) in system engineering process can provide an obvious criteria to assess technology readiness level (TRL) of critical technology elements (CTE) composing the system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bilbro, J. W. (2007), Systematic Assessment of the Program/Project Impacts of Technological Advancement and Insertion, A White Paper.
  2. DAPA (2012), Technology Readiness Assessment Guideline, Korea.
  3. DoD (2005), Technology Readiness Assessment Deskbook, USA.
  4. DoE (2011), Technology Readiness Assessment Guide, USA.
  5. ESA (2008), Technology Readiness Levels Handbook for Space Applications, EU.
  6. GAO (1999), Better Management of Technology Development Can Improve Weapon System Outcomes, USA.
  7. Hwang, H.-W., Kim, H.-R., and Jang, Y.-K. (2012), TRL Impact on Development Schedule and Cost in the Aerospace Project, Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 40(3), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2012.40.3.264
  8. Kim, T.-G., Kwon, S.-J., and Kang B.-G. (2013), Modeling and Simulation Methodology for Defense Systems Based on Concept of System of Systems, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 39(6), 450-460. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2013.39.6.450
  9. Majumdar, W. S. (2007), System of Systems Technology Readiness Assessment (Thesis for Degree of Master), USA.
  10. Mankins, J. C. (1995), Technology Readiness Levels (A White Paper), USA.
  11. Nolte, W. L., Kennedy, B. C., and Dziegiel, R. J. (2003), Technology Readiness Level Calculator, NDIA System Engineering Conference.
  12. Park, K.-J. (2009), The Framework of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Assessment and Case Study, Journal of the Korea Society of Systems Engineering, 5(2), 43-48.
  13. Sadin, S T., Povinelli, F. P., and Rosen, R. (1989), NASA Technology Push towards Future Space Mission Systems, Acta Astronautica, 20, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(89)90054-4
  14. Sauser, B. J., Henry, D., and Dimarzio, D. (2008), A System Maturity Index for the Systems Engineering Life Cycle, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 3(6), 8-30.