INTRODUCTION
Neodilsea Tokida (1943), which was established based on N. yendoana from Japan, was separated from Dilsea Stackhouse by some reproductive characters, such as anatomical features of spermatangia, auxiliary cell branches, cystocarps, and tetrasporangia (Tokida 1943). However, it was known that both genera could be distinguished from each other only by a single feature, tetrasporangial position in cortical filaments: intercalary (or possibly terminal) in Dilsea vs. lateral in Neodilsea (see Bert 1966). Kraft (1978) and Hansen (1980) had a question on this use of a single diagnostic character for generic distinction. According to Lindstrom and Scagel (1987) and Lindstrom (1988, 1994), it is difficult to find characters to separate between the two genera. Recently, Tai et al. (2001) found that the recognition of Dilsea and Neodilsea as distinct genera is tenuous in the molecular analyses. Nevertheless, Neodilsea is currently accepted as a distinct genus within Dumontiaceae Bory de Saint-Vincent (Saunders 2008, Guiry and Guiry 2015). Six species in this genus have been recognized worldwide (Guiry and Guiry 2015): N. borealis (I.A. Abbott) S.C. Lindstrom, N. crispata Masuda, N. longissima (Masuda) S.C. Lindstrom, N. orientalis N.G. Kloczcova, N, tenuipes Yamada & Mikami and N. yendoana.
A red algal species belonging to the Dumontiaceae was collected from the southern coast of Korea during a survey of indigenous species of marine algae. This species is identified as Neodilsea yendoana based on morphological and molecular data. This is the first record of the genus Neodilsea and N. yendoana in Korea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens for this study were collected along the southern coast of Korea. Taxonomic data were obtained from fresh, liquid-preserved and herbarium specimens. Liquid-preserved material was stored in a 10% solution of formalin/seawater. For anatomical observations, the material was cleared in 5–10% NaOH in distilled water for 2–7 days, and then rinsed in distilled water. Blades dissected from the cleared materials were hand sectioned, transferred to a slide with a drop of distilled water, and mounted in pure glycerin. In some instances, a smearing method for microscopic examination was employed. Measurements are given as widths and lengths. For photographs, the sections were stained with 0.5–1.0% aqueous methylene blue, aniline blue, or hematoxylin. For permanent slides, the glycerin was exchanged with 10–20% corn syrup.
Total genomic DNA was extracted from silica gel-dried samples using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Before extraction, dried material was crushed with liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Concentrations of extracted DNA were assessed by using gel electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. Extracted DNA was used for the amplification of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase large subunit (rbcL) regions. PCR amplifications were performed in a TaKaRa PCR Thermal Cycler Dice (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). The PCR products were moved to the Macrogen Sequencing Service for sequencing (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). The PCR primers were also used for sequencing.
Sequences for the rbcL region were aligned using BioEdit (Hall 1999). Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the neighbor-joining, maximum-likelihood, and maximum-parsimony methods. Bootstrap values were calculated with 1,000 replications. The rbcL sequences of other species were obtained from GenBank. Dumontia contorta (S.G.Gmelin) Ruprecht was used as an outgroup.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Neodilsea Tokida 1943: 96
Neodilsea yendoana Tokida 1943: 96. figs. 1-9
Type locality: Osyoro, Prov. Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan.
Specimens examined: NIBR 0000146289, PKNU 0000 127055, PKNU 0000127048, PKNU 0000127058, PKNU 0000127060 (Jindo: 13.ii.2014).
Habitat: Rock near upper to lower intertidal zone.
Morphology: The thalli are 10–15 cm high (Fig. 1a), flattened, multiaxial, red to brown in color, gelatinous in texture, and attached on the substrate by discoid holdfast. The main axes have dichotomous branches. The branches are divided dichotomously to subdichotomously (Fig. 1b), with a rounded or blunt apex, and an entire margin that is 1–2 cm wide and 300–400 μm thick. The proliferations are rare (Fig. 2a) and arranged pinnately to irregularly. The axial cells are large (Fig. 2d). The cortex consists of small and pigmented cells (Fig. 2b) and is one to two cell layers thick (4–5 × 5–6 μm) (Fig. 2c). The medullary cells are arranged in one to three layers and are ellipsoid (100–150 × 50–100 μm) in the transverse section. In female plant, the supporting cell is intercalarily large and ellipsoidal (Fig. 3a). The carpogonial branch is produced from the large supporting cell (Fig. 3b). The gonimoblast initial is produced from auxiliary cell transformed from supporting cell (Fig. 3c). The gonimoblast filaments develop inwardly toward medulla (Fig. 3d), and then form carposporophytes with masses of carposporangia. The carposporangia are round and 10–12 μm in diameter. The cystocarps are immersed in the medulla solitarily or in irregular groups, but are protruded toward surface. They have a thickened pericarp (Fig. 3e and 3f). Male and tetrasporangial plants were not collected during the present study.
Fig. 1.Neodilsea yendoana Tokida. (a) Habit of female plant collected from Jindo, Korea, (b) details of female branches with cystocarps. Scale bars are presented on the figures.
Fig. 2.Neodilsea yendoana Tokida. (a) Rarely produced proliferation, (b) large ellipsoid medullary cells in transverse section of branch, (c) cortical cell layers, (d) large axial cells (asterisks) in transverse section of branch. Scale bars are presented on the figures.
Fig. 3.Neodilsea yendoana Tokida. (a) Large supporting cell (arrow), (b) supporting cell (arrow) with carpogonial branch, (c) gonimoblast initial (arrow) produced from auxiliary cell (arrowhead), (d) gonimoblast filaments (arrows) developing inwardly, (e) carposporophyte in early stage, (f ) solitarily developed cystocarp with protrusion on both surfaces. Scale bars are presented on the figures.
Neodilsea yendoana is morphologically similar to N. borealis, N. crispata, N. orientalis, and N. tenuipes in having a dichotomous branching pattern and compressed axes. Of these, N. borealis and N. crispata are the most similar to N. yendoana, in that they have a gelatinous texture and erect and linear branches. However, N. yendoana is readily distinguished from the two species, as proliferations are rarely produced near the apex of their branches. In those species, proliferations are pinnately or alternately arranged on the branches. N. tenuipes (which shows, together with the dichotomous branching, narrow axes and rare proliferations except for on the apex) differs from N. yendoana in thallus size. N. tenuipes shows a large thallus (20–30 cm), while that of N. yendoana is relatively small (10–15 cm). Neodilsea orientalis can be confused with N. yendoana in gross morphology. In texture, however, the former species has a membranous thallus, while the latter species has a gelatinous one. N. yendoana is characterized by a large and cartilaginous thallus, a dichotomous branching pattern, compressed axes, and rare proliferations near the apex. The Korean alga collected from Jindo in the present study shares these morphological features found in N. yendoana.
In a phylogenetic tree based on the rbcL sequence (Figs. 4–6), this Korean alga nests in the same clade as N. yendoana from Japan. The genetic distance between both sequences within the clade was calculated as 0.2%. Based on the genetic divergence range of 2.0–3.8% found between other Neodilsea species (the present study), this distance value is considered to be in the intraspecific range. This Korean alga is identified as N. yendoana based on the morphological and molecular analyses. This is the first record of the genus Neodilsea and N. yendoana in Korea.
Fig. 4.Phylogenetic tree of Neodilsea species obtained from neighbor-joining method based on rbcL sequences. Bootstrap proportion values (1,000 replicates samples) are shown above branches. Scale bar, 0.01 substitutions/site.
Fig. 5.Phylogenetic tree of Neodilsea species obtained from maximum-likelihood method based on rbcL sequences. Bootstrap proportion values (1,000 replicates samples) are shown above branches. Scale bar, 0.02 substitutions/site.
Fig. 6.Phylogenetic tree of Neodilsea species obtained from maximum-parsimony method based on rbcL sequences. Bootstrap proportion values (1,000 replicates samples) are shown above branches. Scale bar, 10 changes.
References
- Bert JJ. 1966. Remarques sur le genres Dilsea et Neodilsea. Bull Soc Linn Norm 10: 148-154.
- Guiry MD, Guiry GM. 2015. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org/. Accessed 06 September 2015.
- Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41: 95–98.
- Hansen GI. 1980. A morphological study of Fimbrifolium, a new genus in the Cystocloniaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta). J Phycol 16: 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1980.tb03021.x
- Kraft GT. 1978. Studies of marine algae in the lesser-known families of the Gigartinales (Rhodophyta). III. The Mychodeaceae and Mychodeophyllaceae. Aust J Bot 26: 515-610. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9780515
- Lindstrom SC. 1988. The Dumontieae, a resurrected tribe of red algae (Dumontiaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 27: 89-102. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-27-1-89.1
- Lindstrom SC. 1994. Dilsea and Neodilsea. In: The Biology of Economic Seaweeds (Akatsuka I, ed). SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 77-94.
- Lindstrom SC, Scagel RF. 1987. The marine algae of British Columbia, northern Washington, and southeast Alaska: division Rhodophyta (red algae), class Rhodophyceae, order Gigartinales, family Dumontiaceae, with an introduction to the order Gigartinales. Can J Bot 65: 2202-2232. https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-303
- Saunders GW. 2008. A DNA barcode examination of the red algal family Dumontiaceae in Canadian waters reveals substantial cryptic species diversity. 1. The foliose Dilsea-Neodilsea complex and Weeksia. Botany 86: 773-789. https://doi.org/10.1139/B08-001
- Tai V, Lindstrom SC, Saunders GW. 2001. Phylogeny of the Dumontiaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) and associated families based on SSU rDNA and internal transcribed spacer sequence data. J Phycol 37: 184-196. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037001184.x
- Tokida J. 1943. On the so-called Dilsea edulis of Japan. Bot Mag Tokyo 57: 93~97. https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.57.93