DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등학생을 위한 융합활동-로봇분야 교육과정 모델 개발

A Development of Robot and Convergence Activity Curriculum Model for Elementary School Students

  • 김철 (광주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Kim, Chul (Dept. of Computer Education, Kwangju National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2015.11.21
  • 심사 : 2015.12.14
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31

초록

최근에 초등학교에도 융합 인재 교육 정책이 시행됨에 따라 교육현장에서는 로봇교육의 중요성이 높아지고 있다. 본 연구는 초등학교의 소프트웨어 교육에서 융합활동 영역의 로봇분야 교육과정을 제안하였다. 제안한 로봇 교육과정은 반복적이고 점진적으로 학습이 가능하도록 교육내용 체계를 7단계의 무지개 색깔로 구분하였으며, 각 단계별 2개씩 총 14개의 성취기준을 제시하였다. 이는 무학년제로 단계별 학습내용을 이수하면 상급 단계로 진급할 수 있도록 하였다. 제안된 로봇교육과정을 토대로 교재와 콘텐츠를 개발하여 일선학교현장에 제공한다면 초등학교 로봇교육에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Lately, the importance of robot education is rising in elementary schools, because of STAEM education. In this study, robot and convergence activity curriculum in software education was developed to robot education for elementary school. We suggested robot education framework based on the Rainbow system, which is repeatable and progressive. The framework is divided into 7 steps, 14 criteria. So, their students can be promoted to the higher level when they complete the lower level, regardless of their grade. It is necessary for robot education in elementary schools to develop the contents and programs according to suggested curriculum.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. CSTA (2011). CSTA Computer Science Standards Revised 2011, The CSTA Standards Task Force, https://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/K12Standards.html
  2. Department for Education (2014). The national curri culum in England, Retrieved from : https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-primary-curriculum
  3. KAIE (2014). Contents of Information Science Curriculum for Elementary School, KAIE.
  4. Kim, C. (2014). A Study on Contents of Robot Education Curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(3), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.3.443
  5. Moon, W. S. (2007). A Programming Language Learning Model Using Educational Robot. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 11(2), 231-241.
  6. Papert, S., Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  7. Park, E.S., Moon, S. H. (2009). Development and Application of a Robot Education Program for Logical Thinking Ability in Elementary Students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(1), 175-198.
  8. Park, J. H., Kim, C. (2010). A Study in Program Development of Course Incorporated Education by Utilizing Robots in Elementary Schools. Korean Association of Computer Education, 14(1), 35-44.
  9. Park, J. H., Kim, C. (2010), The Effects of Robot Based Mathematics Learning on Learners' Attitude and Problem Solving Skills. Korean Association of Computer Education, 13(5), 71-80.
  10. Park, J. H., Kim, C. (2014). A Study on the Curriculum for Elementary and Middle School in Robot and Convergence Activity. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(2), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.2.285
  11. Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing for a More Seeds the Creative Society. Learning & Leading with Technology. 18-22.
  12. Wing, J. M. (2015). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

피인용 문헌

  1. 개념이해와 학습활동을 고려한 네트워크 및 디지털 창작도구 교육과정 모델 개발 vol.20, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.6.563
  2. 개념이해와 학습활동을 고려한 초등학교 로봇 교육과정 모델 개발에 관한 연구 vol.20, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.6.645
  3. 초등학교 로봇컴퓨팅교육을 위한 교육내용체계의 성취기준에 관한 연구 vol.21, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.1.97
  4. 초등 소프트웨어 교육 연구 동향 분석: 국내 학술지 중심으로 vol.21, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.5.509