Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal sensor placement for health monitoring of high-rise structure based on collaborative-climb monkey algorithm

  • Yi, Ting-Hua (School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology) ;
  • Zhou, Guang-Dong (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University) ;
  • Li, Hong-Nan (School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Xu-Dong (School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology)
  • Received : 2014.09.25
  • Accepted : 2015.01.13
  • Published : 2015.04.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Optimal sensor placement (OSP) is an integral component in the design of an effective structural health monitoring (SHM) system. This paper describes the implementation of a novel collaborative-climb monkey algorithm (CMA), which combines the artificial fish swarm algorithm (AFSA) with the monkey algorithm (MA), as a strategy for the optimal placement of a predefined number of sensors. Different from the original MA, the dual-structure coding method is adopted for the representation of design variables. The collaborative-climb process that can make the full use of the monkeys' experiences to guide the movement is proposed and incorporated in the CMA to speed up the search efficiency of the algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated by a numerical example with a high-rise structure. The results show that the proposed CMA algorithm can provide a robust design for sensor networks, which exhibits superior convergence characteristics when compared to the original MA using the dual-structure coding method.

Keywords

References

  1. Carne, T.G. and Dohmann, C.R. (1995), "A modal test design strategy for modal correlation", Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, Schenectady, New York, USA.
  2. Chiu, P.L. and Lin, F.Y.S. (2004), "A simulated annealing algorithm to support the sensor placement for target location", Proceedings of the IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ontario, Canada.
  3. Chow, H.M., Lam, H.F., Yin, T. and Au, S.K. (2010), "Optimal sensor configuration of a typical transmission tower for the purpose of structural model updating", Struct. Control Hlth., 18(3), 305-320.
  4. Dutta, R., Ganguli, R. and Mani, V. (2011), "Swarm intelligence algorithms for integrated optimization of piezoelectric actuator and sensor placement and feedback gains", Smart Mater. Struct., 20(10), 1-14.
  5. ETABS, Computer & Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA, http://www.csiberkeley.com.
  6. Fidanova, S., Marinov, P. and Alba, E. (2012), "Ant algorithm for optimal sensor deployment", Comput. Int., 399, 21-29.
  7. Lei, Y. and He, M.Y. (2013a), "Identification of the nonlinear properties of rubber-bearings in base-isolated buildings with limited seismic response data", Sci. China Tech. Sci., 56(5), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5196-3
  8. Lei, Y., Liu, C., Jiang, Y.Q. and Mao, Y.K. (2013b), "Substructure based structural damage detection with limited input and output measurements", Smart Struct. Syst., 12(6), 619-640. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.12.6.619
  9. Lei, Y., Wang, H.F. and Shen, W.A. (2012a), "Update the finite element model of Canton Tower based on direct matrix updating with incomplete modal data", Smart Struct. Syst., 10(4-5), 471-483. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.4_5.471
  10. Lei, Y., Wu, Y. and Li, T. (2012b), "Identification of nonlinear structural parameters under limited input and output measurements", Int. J. Nonlin. Mech., 47, 1141-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.09.004
  11. Liu, W., Gao, W.C., Sun, Y. and Xu, M. (2008), "Optimal sensor placement for spatial lattice structure based on genetic algorithms", J. Sound Vib., 317(1), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.026
  12. Li, J., Hao, H. and Lo. J.V. (2015), "Structural damage identification with power spectral density transmissibility: numerical and experimental studies", Smart Struct. Syst., 15(1), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.1.015
  13. Li, J., Law, S.S., and Hao, H. (2013), "Improved damage identification in bridge structures subject to moving loads: Numerical and experimental studies", Int. J. Mech. Sci., 74, 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.05.002
  14. Li, X., Shao, Z. and Qian, J. (2002), "An optimizing method base on autonomous animates: fish swarm algorithm", Syst. Eng. Theory Pract., 11, 32-38.
  15. MATLAB, The MathWorks, Inc. Natwick, MA (USA), http://www.mathworks.com.
  16. Maul, W.A., Kopasakis, G., Santi, L.M., Sowers, T.S. and Chicatelli, A. (2008), "Sensor selection and optimization for health assessment of aerospace systems", J. Aero. Comp. Inf. Com., 5(1), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34677
  17. Meo, M. and Zumpano, G. (2005), "On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure", Eng. Struct., 27(10), 1488-1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.015
  18. Mini, S., Udgata, S.K. and Sabat, S.L. (2011), "Sensor deployment in 3-D terrain using artificial bee colony algorithm", Lect. Notes Comput. Sc., 6536, 313-324.
  19. Papadimitriou, C., Haralampidis, Y. and Sobczykb, K. (2005), "Optimal experimental design in stochastic structural dynamics", Prob. Eng. Mech., 20(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.06.002
  20. Rao, A.R.M. and Anandakumar, G. (2007), "Optimal placement of sensors for structural system identification and health monitoring using a hybrid swarm intelligence technique", Smart Mater. Struct., 16(6), 2658-2672. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/6/071
  21. Shen, W., Guo, X.P., Wu, C. and Wu, D. (2011), "Forecasting stock indices using radial basis function neural networks optimized by artificial fish swarm algorithm", Knowl. Bas. Syst., 24(3), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.11.001
  22. Tsai, H.C. and Lin, Y.H. (2011), "Modification of the fish swarm algorithm with particle swarm optimization formulation and communication behavior", Appl. Soft Comput., 11(8), 5367-5374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.022
  23. Yao, L., Sethares, W.A. and Kammer, D.C. (1993), "Sensor placement for on orbit modal identification via a genetic algorithm", AIAA J., 31(10), 1167-1169. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49057
  24. Yi, T.H. and Li, H.N. (2012a), "Methodology developments in sensor placement for health monitoring of civil infrastructures", Int. J. Distrib. Sens. N., 2012, 612726.
  25. Yi, T.H., Li, H.N. and Gu, M. (2011a), "A new method for optimal selection of sensor location on a high-rise building using simplified finite element model", Struct. Eng. Mech., 37(6), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.37.6.671
  26. Yi, T.H., Li, H.N. and Gu, M. (2011b), "Optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring based on multiple optimization strategies", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 20(7), 881-900. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.712
  27. Yi, T.H., Li, H.N. and Gu, M. (2013), "Recent research and applications of GPS-based monitoring technology for high-rise structures", Struct. Control Hlth., 20(5), 649-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1501
  28. Yi, T.H., Li, H.N. and Zhang, X.D. (2012b), "A modified monkey algorithm for optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring", Smart Mater Struct., 21(10), 105033. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/10/105033
  29. Yi, T.H., Li, H.N. and Zhang, X.D. (2012c), "Sensor placement on Canton Tower for health monitoring using asynchronous-climbing monkey algorithm", Smart Mater. Struct., 21(12), 125023. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/12/125023
  30. Zhao, R.Q. and Tang, W.S. (2008), "Monkey algorithm for global numerical optimization", J. Uncertain Syst., 2(3), 165-176.

Cited by

  1. Multi-swarm fruit fly optimization algorithm for structural damage identification vol.56, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.3.409
  2. Bioinspired Intelligent Algorithm and Its Applications for Mobile Robot Control: A Survey vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3810903
  3. A flexible traffic stream model and its three representations of traffic flow vol.75, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.006
  4. A survey on sensor placement for contamination detection in water distribution systems 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1358-0
  5. Empirical validation of vehicle type-dependent car-following heterogeneity from micro- and macro-viewpoints pp.2168-0582, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2018.1517057
  6. Sensor placement for structural health monitoring using hybrid optimization algorithm based on sensor distribution index and FE grids vol.25, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2160
  7. Reliable monitoring of embankment dams with optimal selection of geotechnical instruments vol.4, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/smm.2017.4.1.085
  8. A measuring system for determination of a cantilever beam support moment vol.19, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.19.4.431
  9. Improved block-wise MET for estimating vibration fields from the sensor vol.64, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.64.3.279
  10. BB-BC optimization algorithm for structural damage detection using measured acceleration responses vol.64, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.64.3.353
  11. Optimal sensor placement for cable force monitoring using spatial correlation analysis and bond energy algorithm vol.20, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.6.769
  12. A multitype sensor placement method for the modal estimation of structure vol.21, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.21.4.407
  13. A state-of-the-art review of an optimal sensor placement for contaminant warning system in a water distribution network vol.15, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2019.1597378
  14. Experimental and numerical studies on mechanical behavior of buried pipelines crossing faults vol.75, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.75.1.071