DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Outcomes of Three Reconstruction Methods after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy

  • Kim, Chang Hyun (Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Song, Kyo Young (Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Cho Hyun (Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Seo, Young Joo (Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Seung-Man (Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Jo (Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2015.03.04
  • Accepted : 2015.03.16
  • Published : 2015.03.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical and long-term functional outcomes of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 697 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for operable gastric cancer between January 2009 and December 2012. The patients were classified into three groups according to the reconstruction methods: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y. The parameters evaluated included patient and tumor characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Endoscopic findings of the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, bile (RGB) classification and the Los Angeles classification 1 year postoperatively. Results: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y were performed in 165 (23.7%), 371 (53.2%), and 161 patients (23.1%), respectively. Operation time was significantly shorter ($173.4{\pm}44.7$ minute, P<0.001) as was time to first flatus ($2.8{\pm}0.8$ days, P=0.009), time to first soft diet was significantly faster ($4.3{\pm}1.0$ days, P<0.001), and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter ($7.7{\pm}4.0$ days, P=0.004) in Billroth I in comparison to the other methods. Postoperative complications higher than Clavien-Dindo grade III occurred in 61 patients (8.8%) with no statistically significant differences between groups (P=0.797). Endoscopic findings confirmed that gastric residue, gastritis, bile reflux, and reflux esophagitis were significantly lower in Roux-en-Y (P<0.001) patients. Conclusions: Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer is beneficial in terms of long-term functional outcome, whereas Billroth I reconstruction for distal-third gastric cancer has a superior short-term surgical outcome and postoperative weight change.

Keywords

References

  1. Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:354-362. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i3.354
  2. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Lee DH, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2011. Cancer Res Treat 2014;46:109-123. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.109
  3. Kim JP. Current status of surgical treatment of gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2002;79:79-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.10050
  4. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146-148.
  5. Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 2011;11:69-77. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69
  6. Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Shimada H, Gunji Y. Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1172-1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8207-4
  7. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N; Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 2007;245:68-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225364.03133.f8
  8. Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc 2005;19:168-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8808-y
  9. Uyama I, Suda K, Satoh S. Laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. J Gastric Cancer 2013;13:19-25. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.1.19
  10. Hirao M, Takiguchi S, Imamura H, Yamamoto K, Kurokawa Y, Fujita J, et al; Osaka University Clinical Research Group for Gastroenterological Study. Comparison of Billroth I and Rouxen-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: one-year postoperative effects assessed by a multi-institutional RCT. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1591-1597. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2704-9
  11. Katai H, Nunobe S, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Sano T. Reconstruction after distal gastrectomy. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2008;109:264-268.
  12. Kobori O, Shimizu T, Maeda M, Atomi Y, Watanabe J, Shoji M, et al. Enhancing effect of bile and bile acid on stomach tumorigenesis induced by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in Wistar rats. J Natl Cancer Inst 1984;73:853-861.
  13. Kang KC, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim W, Kim HH, Kim MC, et al; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Comparison of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of large-scale multicenter results from Korea. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1953-1961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1493-0
  14. Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, et al; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a largescale korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2692-2700. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0075-z
  15. Zong L, Chen P. Billroth I vs. Billroth II vs. Roux-en-Y following distal gastrectomy: a meta-analysis based on 15 studies. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:1413-1424. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge10567
  16. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A 3th, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.
  17. Sano T, Aiko T. New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:97-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0040-6
  18. Kim JJ, Song KY, Chin HM, Kim W, Jeon HM, Park CH, et al. Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy with various types of intracorporeal anastomosis using laparoscopic linear staplers: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 2008;22:436-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9446-y
  19. Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Kim JG, et al. Long-term outcomes and survival after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: three-year survival analysis of a single-center experience in Korea. J Surg Oncol 2011;104:511-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21982
  20. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  21. Kubo M, Sasako M, Gotoda T, Ono H, Fujishiro M, Saito D, et al. Endoscopic evaluation of the remnant stomach after gastrectomy: proposal for a new classification. Gastric Cancer 2002;5:83-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101200200014
  22. Miwa H, Yokoyama T, Hori K, Sakagami T, Oshima T, Tomita T, et al. Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: a validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists. Dis Esophagus 2008;21:355-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00788.x
  23. Inokuchi M, Kojima K, Yamada H, Kato K, Hayashi M, Motoyama K, et al. Long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2013;16:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0154-5
  24. Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park do J, Lee HJ, Kim HH, et al. What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc 2012;26:1539-1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2064-8
  25. Mathias JR, Fernandez A, Sninsky CA, Clench MH, Davis RH. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain after Roux-en-Y anastomosis: motility of the jejunal limb. Gastroenterology 1985;88:101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(85)80140-2
  26. Hoya Y, Mitsumori N, Yanaga K. The advantages and disadvantages of a Roux-en-Y reconstruction after a distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Today 2009;39:647-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-009-3964-2
  27. Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M, Kawano T, Sugihara K. A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg 2008;247:962-967. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d9526
  28. Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, Nakayama H, Ishigami H, Fujii S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. World J Surg 2005;29:1415-1420; discussion 1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7830-0
  29. Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Javed MA, Nunes QM, Huang W, Mai G, et al. Roux-en-Y versus BillrothIreconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:1124-1134. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i7.1124
  30. Kumagai K, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Jiang X, Kubota T, Aikou S, et al. Different features of complications with Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:2145-2152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1683-7
  31. Bo T, Zhihong P, Peiwu Y, Feng Q, Ziqiang W, Yan S, et al. General complications following laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy and analysis of techniques to manage them. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1860-1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0312-3
  32. Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, Scandroglio I, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, et al. Total and subtotal laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2007;21:21-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0409-x
  33. Kojima K, Inokuchi M, Kato K, Motoyama K, Sugihara K. Petersen's hernia after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2014;17:146-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0256-8

Cited by

  1. Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer in 2014 vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.131
  2. Uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.10, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2016.1248404
  3. SINGLE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS (ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS OR MINI GASTRIC BYPASS): THE EXPERIENCE WITH BILLROTH II MUST BE CONSIDERED AND IS A CHALLENGE FOR THE NEXT YEARS vol.30, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201700040010
  4. Long-term functional outcomes of Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstructions after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis vol.32, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6192-2
  5. Comparison between uncut Roux-en-Y and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis vol.24, pp.24, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i24.2628
  6. Revisiting Laparoscopic Reconstruction for Billroth 1 Versus Billroth 2 Versus Roux-en-Y After Distal Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in the Modern Era vol.43, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04943-x
  7. Clinical Comparative Study of Laparoscopic D2 Radical Gastrectomy and Open Operation for Gastric Cancer vol.81, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1825-1
  8. Comparison of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction After Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study vol.36, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01104-3
  9. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) comparing the quality of life between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric vol.19, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5396-8
  10. Postoperative complications and nutritional status between uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis and Billroth II anastomosis after D2 distal gastrectomy: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3531-0
  11. Uncut Roux-en-Y Reconstruction in a Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Study of 228 Consecutive Cases and Short-Term Outcomes vol.26, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350619860964
  12. Billroth‐I vs Roux‐en‐Y after distal gastrectomy: A comparison of long‐term nutritional status and survival rates from a large‐scale multicenter cohort study vol.4, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12309
  13. Risk Factors for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e4
  14. Uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: Learning curve and surgical outcomes vol.16, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.20008
  15. Comparison of Quality of Life and Nutritional Status of Between Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I Reconstruction After Distal Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.72, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2019.1656262
  16. Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair and Roux-en-Y Conversion for Refractory Duodenogastroesophageal Reflux after Billroth I Distal Gastrectomy vol.20, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e23
  17. Postprandial Asymptomatic Glycemic Fluctuations after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device vol.21, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e31
  18. Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy Reduced Endoscopic Reflux Esophagitis in Older Adults: Propensity Score-Matching Analysis vol.105, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00045.1
  19. Uncut Roux-en-Y might reduce the rate of reflux gastritis after radical distal gastrectomy: An evidence mapping from a systematic review vol.97, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106184