References
- Veeresh GS, Kumar P, Mehrotra I. Treatment of phenol and cresols in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) process: a review. Water Res. 2005;39:154-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.028
- Odegaard H. Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2006;53:17-33.
- Li YM, Gu GW, Zhao JF, Yu HQ, Qiu YL, Peng YG. Treatment of coke- plant wastewater by biofilm systems for removal of organic compounds and nitrogen. Chemosphere 2003;52:997-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00287-X
- Vazquez I, Rodriguez J, Maranon E, Castrillon L, Fernandez Y. Study of the aerobic biodegradation of coke wastewater in a two and three-step activated sludge process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006;137:1681-1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.007
- Hung CH, Pavlostathis SG. Fate and transformation of thiocyanate and cyanate under methanogenic conditions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998;49:112-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051146
- Zhao W, Huang X, Lee D. Enhanced treatment of coke plant wastewater using an anaerobic-anoxic-oxic membrane bioreactor system. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009;66:279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.12.028
- Chakraborty S, Veeramani H. Effect of HRT and recycle ratio on removal of cyanide, phenol, thiocyanate and ammonia in an anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic continuous system. Process Biochem. 2006;41:96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.067
- Sahariah BP, Chakraborty S. Kinetic analysis of phenol, thiocyanate and ammonia-nitrogen removals in an anaerobic-anoxic- aerobic moving bed bioreactor system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;190:260-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.038
- Sahariah BP, Chakraborty S. Effect of cycle and fill time on performance of sequential anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic fed batch moving bed reactor. Environ. Technol. 2013;34:245-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2012.692712
- APHA, AWWA, WPCF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1998.
- Kim YM, Cho HU, Lee DS, Park C, Park D, Park JM. Response of nitrifying bacterial communities to the increased thiocyanate concentration in pre-denitrification process. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102:913-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.032
- Li H, Han H, Du M, Wang W. Inhibition and recovery of nitrification in treating real coal gasification wastewater with moving bed biofilm reactor. J. Environ. Sci. 2011;23:568-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60449-4
- Kim YM, Park D, Lee DS, Park JM. Inhibitory effects of toxic compounds on nitrification process for cokes wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;152:915-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.065
- Kaballo HP, Zhao Y, Wilderer PA. Elimination of p-chlorophenol in biofilm reactors- a comparative study of continuous flow and sequenced operation. Water Sci. Technol. 1995;31: 51-60.
- Wilderer PA, Roske I, Ueberschar A, David L. Continuous flow and sequenced batch operation of biofilm reactors: A comparative study of shock loading responses. Biofouling 1993;6: 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927019309386232
- Mendoza-Espinosa LG, Tom S. Organic and hydraulic shock loadings on a biological aerated filter. Environ. Technol. 2001;22:321-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332208618281
- Woolard CR. The advantages of periodically operated biofilm reactors for the treatment of highly variable wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 1997;35:199-206.
Cited by
- Stability of continuous and fed batch sequential anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic moving bed bioreactor systems at phenol shock load application pp.1479-487X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1343388