DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation of Near Stereoacuity and Phoria, and Refractive Error

근거리 입체시와 사위 및 굴절이상의 상관관계

  • Shim, Hyun-Suk (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Hyun (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Cheong (Dept. of Medical science, Graduate School Chonnam National University)
  • 심현석 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김상현 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김영청 (전남대학교 일반대학원 의학과)
  • Received : 2015.02.11
  • Accepted : 2015.03.17
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was investigated the relationship between the male and female of near stereoacuity and phoria, and was examined the correlations between near stereoacuity and phoria and refractive error. Methods: Adult 83 (male 36, female 47, mean age $21.09{\pm}1.74$(19~29) years old) target was examined after full correction of refractive error. Near stereoacuity was measured by using Titmus-fly Stereotest(Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and RANDOT Stereotest (Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), phoria was measured by using modified torrington method, at distance 40 cm. Results: In near stereoacuity, male was better good than female, and there was no difference between male and female (p>0.05). In near phoria, female was more higher than male, and there was a significant difference between male and female (p<0.05). Near stereoacuity by Titmus-fly test and Randot test result respectively was $262.17{\pm}562.43$ sec (second of arc) $243.08{\pm}68.04$ sec in esophoria, $148.42{\pm}269.54$ sec, $107.40{\pm}263.74$ sec in orthophoria, $113.94{\pm}152.46$ sec, $79.70{\pm}136.83$ sec in exophoria, there was a no difference between three phoria groups (p>0.05), and was a high correlation between phoria and near stereoacity(r=0.68). In addition, near stereoacuity in the refractive error respectively was $80.00{\pm}571.43$ sec, $68.75{\pm}36.82$ sec in myopia, $133.57{\pm}224.15$ sec, $93.14{\pm}214.95$ sec in hyperopia, $511.20{\pm}855.00$ sec, $511.4{\pm}855.60$ sec, there was a significant difference between three phoria groups (p<0.05). when was classfiied near stersoacuity into degree of refractive error, near stersoacuity was best in emmetropia, and was reduced when refractive error was highest in high degree myopia, and hyperopia. Conclusions: Titmus-fly Stereotest and RANDOT Stereotest result, near stereoacuity of adults, when esophoria and high degree refractive error, was reduced, there was a relationship between near stereoacuity with phoria, and refractive error. In this both stereotests if was bad when near stereoacuity can expect a phoria and refractive error.

목적: 본 연구는 성인 남녀의 근거리 입체시와 근거리 사위의 관계를 알아보고, 근거리 입체시와 사위 및 굴절이상과의 상관성을 조사하였다. 방법: 성인 83명(남자 36명, 여자 47명, 평균 연령 $21.09{\pm}1.74$(19~29)세)을 대상으로 굴절이상자는 완전교정 후, 검사거리 40 cm에서 근거리 입체시는 Titmus-fly Stereotest(Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)와 RANDOT Stereotest(Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), 사위는 수정토링톤법(modified torrington method)으로 측정하였다. 결과: 근거리 입체시는 남자가 여자보다 더 좋았고 남녀 간에 차이는 없었으나, 근거리 사위는 여자가 남자보다 더 높았으며 남녀 간에 유의한 차이가 있었다(p<0.05). 근거리 입체시는 Titmus-fly Stereotest와 RANDOT Stereotest 결과 각각 내사위에서 $262.17{\pm}562.43$초, $243.08{\pm}68.04$초, 정위에서 $148.42{\pm}269.54$초, $107.40{\pm}263.74$초, 외사위에서 $113.94{\pm}152.46$초, $79.70{\pm}136.83$초로 사위 세 그룹 간에는 차이가 없었으나(p>0.05), 내사위와 근거리 입체시는 높은 상관성이 있었다(r=0.68). 또한 근거리 입체시가 굴절이상에서는 각각 정시에서 $80.00{\pm}571.43$초, $68.75{\pm}36.82$초, 근시에서 $133.57{\pm}224.15$초, $93.14{\pm}214.95$초 원시에서 $511.20{\pm}855.00$초, $511.4{\pm}855.60$초로 세 그룹 간에 유의한 차이를 나타냈다(p<0.05). 근거리 입체시를 굴절이상도로 분류했을 때, 정시에서 가장 좋고 고도 근시, 고도원시로 굴절이상도가 높았을 때 감소하였다. 결론: Titmus-fly Stereotest와 RANDOT Stereotest 결과, 성인의 근거리 입체시는 내사위일 때, 굴절이상이 높을 때 감소되어 사위 및 굴절이상과 관계가 있었고, 이 두 입체시 검사에서 근거리 입체시가 나쁠 경우에 사위 또는 굴절이상을 예상할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Saladin JJ. Effects of heterophoria on stereopsis. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72(7):487-492. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199507000-00008
  2. Hong SW, Park SC. Stereoacuity of normal subjects assessed by frisby davis distance stereotest. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;47(1):154-159.
  3. Von Noordern GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility, 5th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996;24-28.
  4. Tychsen L. Binocular vision. In: William MH(ed) Adler's physiology of the eye: clinical applications, 9th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1992;773-853.
  5. Jin YH. Strabismology, 2nd Ed. Seoul: UUP, 1999;67-75.
  6. Simons K. Stereoacuity norms in young children. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(3):439-445. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010441010
  7. Campos EC, Enoch JM. Amount of aniseikonia compatible with fine binocular vision: some old and new concepts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980;17(1):44-47.
  8. Lovasik JV, Szymkiw M. Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance and pupil size on stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(5):741-750.
  9. Jung SA, Kim HJ. Comparison of stereopsis by influence factors in induced aniseikonia. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2013;18(4):465-471. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2013.18.4.465
  10. Colenbrander MC. The limits of stereoscopis vision. Ophthalmologica. 1948;115(6):363-366.
  11. Levy NS, Glick EB. Stereoscopic perception and snellen visual acuity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;78(4):722-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76312-3
  12. Larson WL, Lachance A. Stereoscopic acuity with induced refractive errors. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983;60(6):509-513. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198306000-00011
  13. Jimnez JR, Olivares JL, Prez-Ocn F, del Barco LJ. Associated phoria in relation to stereopsis with random-dot stereograms. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(1):47-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200001000-00013
  14. Shin HS, Lee SH, Yun MO, Kim MY, Bae HS, Park SC. Relationship between the degree of exophoria and stereoacuity. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2009;14(2):41-46.
  15. Matsubayashi A, Graham CH. Visual space perception. vision and pecerption, 1st Ed. New York: John Wiley&Sons, 1965;292.
  16. Stimar G. Blurred visual stimuli on vernier and stereoacuity. Acta Ophthalmol. 1971;49(3):364-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1971.tb00963.x
  17. Cooper J, Warshowsky J. Lateral displacement as a response cue in the titmus stereotest. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977; 54(8):537-541. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197708000-00009
  18. Hansell R. Stereopsis and arc. Am Orthopt J. 1991;41:122-127.
  19. Frisby JP, Mein J, Saye A, Stanworth A. Use of random-dot sterograms in the clinical assessment of strabismic patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975;59(10):545-552. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.59.10.545
  20. Cooper J, Feldman J. Random-dot-stereogram performance by strabismic, amblyopic, and ocular-pathology patients in an operant-discrimination task. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978;55(9):599-609. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197809000-00001
  21. Schroeder TL, Rainey BB, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Reliability of and comparisons among methods of measuring dissociated phoria. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73(6):389-397. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199606000-00006
  22. Rainey BB, Schroeder TL, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(10):719-726. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199810000-00016
  23. Casillas EC, Rosenfield M. Comparison of subjective heterophoria testing with a phoropter and trial frame. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(4):237-241. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000214316.50270.24
  24. Sung PJ. Optometry, 7th Ed. Seoul: Deihakseolim, 2011;195-276.
  25. Cho YA, Cho SW, Roh GH. Evaluation of criteria of stereoacuity for titmus, randot & tno stereotests. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;40(2):532-537.
  26. Sheedy JE, Saladin JJ. Phoria, vergence, and fixation disparity in oculomotor problems. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977;54(7):474-478. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197707000-00008
  27. Ogle KN. Researches in Binocular Vision, 1st Ed. New York; Hafner, 1964;159-162.
  28. Sethi B, North RV. Vergence adaptive changes with varying magnitudes of prism-induced disparities and fusional amplitudes. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64(4):263-268. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198704000-00006
  29. Min BM, Park WC. The relationship between visual acuity and titmus stereoacuity. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1987;28(6):1339-1342.

Cited by

  1. The Change of the Near Eye Position according to the Spectacle and Contact Lens Wearing vol.3, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15205/kschs.2015.3.4.435
  2. Changes of Visual Acuity and Visual Function in the Elderly Generation and their Subjective Satisfaction by the Use of Tinted Ophthalmic Lenses vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2016.21.1.1
  3. Study of the Correlation of Static Stereoacuity according to the Astigmatism Power and the Degree of Uncorrected Astigmatism vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.1.19
  4. Contrast Sensitivity of Dominant and Non-Dominant Eyes in Adults vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.4.433