Smart Structures and Systems

  • 제15권3호
  • /
  • Pages.577-592
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1738-1584(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-1991(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Can we substitute the intuition of an experienced bridge inspector by monitoring?

  • 투고 : 2014.11.27
  • 심사 : 2015.01.20
  • 발행 : 2015.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Damage quantification is a major goal of the SHM community. Methodologies to introduce a quantity for actual condition of a structure into the assessment process are desired. The idea that the condition of a structure is represented in the character of its dynamic response is fully accepted by the SHM community. The VCLIFE methodology quantifies condition analyzing input from monitoring.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Furtner, P. (2009), Flughafen Wien Schwechat Vorfahrt Ost Terminal 2 -Objekt 102, Dynamische Charakteristik der Bauwerke, Periodische Nachmessung und Interpretation der Ergebnisse. Report 09/1042, April 2009.
  2. Wenzel, H. (2009), Health Monitoring of Bridges, J. Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester -England, ISBN 9780470031735, 2009.
  3. Wenzel, H. et al. (2013), Industrial Safety and Life Cycle Engineering, VCE Vienna Consulting Engineers ZT GmbH, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 9783200031791, 2013.
  4. Wenzel, H. and Pichler D. (2005), Ambient Vibration Monitoring, J. Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester -England, ISBN 0470024305, 2005.
  5. Wenzel, H., Veit-Egerer, R., Widmann, M. and Jaornik, P. (2009), WP3 Demonstration Report. Deliverable D11.1, October 2009.