DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intravenous contrast media application using cone-beam computed tomography in a rabbit model

  • Kim, Min-Sung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Bok-Yeol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Hwa-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Yoon-Joo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Oh, Song-Hee (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kang, Ju-Hee (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Sae-Rom (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kang, Ju-Han (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Gyu-Tae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Yong-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hwang, Eui-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.13
  • 심사 : 2014.06.09
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31

초록

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of visualizing soft tissue lesions and vascular structures using contrast-enhanced cone-beam computed tomography (CE-CBCT) after the intravenous administration of a contrast medium in an animal model. Materials and Methods: CBCT was performed on six rabbits after a contrast medium was administered using an injection dose of 2 mL/kg body weight and an injection rate of 1 mL/s via the ear vein or femoral vein under general anesthesia. Artificial soft tissue lesions were created through the transplantation of autologous fatty tissue into the salivary gland. Volume rendering reconstruction, maximum intensity projection, and multiplanar reconstruction images were reconstructed and evaluated in order to visualize soft tissue contrast and vascular structures. Results: The contrast enhancement of soft tissue was possible using all contrast medium injection parameters. An adequate contrast medium injection parameter for facilitating effective CE-CBCT was a 5-mL injection before exposure combined with a continuous 5-mL injection during scanning. Artificial soft tissue lesions were successfully created in the animals. The CE-CBCT images demonstrated adequate opacification of the soft tissues and vascular structures. Conclusion: Despite limited soft tissue resolution, the opacification of vascular structures was observed and artificial soft tissue lesions were visualized with sufficient contrast to the surrounding structures. The vascular structures and soft tissue lesions appeared well delineated in the CE-CBCT images, which was probably due to the superior spatial resolution of CE-CBCT compared to other techniques, such as multislice computed tomography.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2767-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0651-9
  2. Kalender WA. The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging. Radiologe 2003; 43: 379-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-003-0897-4
  3. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80.
  4. Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/12615645
  5. Yu JJ, Kim GT, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Paek J, Kim SH, et al. Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 275-83. https://doi.org/10.2319/060811-374.1
  6. Kim SH, Kang SM, Choi YS, Kook YA, Chung KR, Huang JC. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of miniimplants after placement: is root proximity a major risk factor for failure? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 264-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.026
  7. Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 825-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.002
  8. Kim GT, Kim SH, Choi YS, Park YJ, Chung KR, Suk KE, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of orthodontic miniplate anchoring screws in the posterior maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 628.e1-10.
  9. Choi HS, Kim GT, Choi YS, Hwang EH. Surgical stent for dental implant using cone beam CT images. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2010; 40: 171-8.
  10. Kim SH, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: S82-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.027
  11. Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D. The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 454-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01816.x
  12. Jin JY, Ren L, Liu Q, Kim J, Wen N, Guan H, et al. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Phys 2010; 37: 5634-44. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3497272
  13. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1088-95. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1653
  14. Struffert T, Richter G, Engelhorn T, Doelken M, Goelitz P, Kalender WA, et al. Visualisation of intracerebral haemor-rhage with flat-detector CT compared to multislice CT: results in 44 cases. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 619-25.
  15. Doelken M, Struffert T, Richter G, Engelhorn T, Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, et al. Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 517-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-008-0372-z
  16. Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.027
  17. Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77: 397-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.023
  18. Engelhorn T, Struffert T, Richter G, Doelken M, Ganslandt O, Kalender W, et al. Flat panel detector angiographic CT in the management of aneurysmal rupture during coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1581-4. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1119
  19. Meyer BC, Frericks BB, Albrecht T, Wolf KJ, Wacker FK. Contrast-enhanced abdominal angiographic CT for intraabdominal tumor embolization: a new tool for vessel and soft tissue visualization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30: 743-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9029-2
  20. Meyer BC, Frericks BB, Voges M, Borchert M, Martus P, Justiz J, et al. Visualization of hypervascular liver lesions during TACE: comparison of angiographic C-arm CT and MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: W263-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2695
  21. Struffert T, Doelken M, Adamek E, Schwarz M, Engelhorn T, Kloska S, et al. Flat-detector computed tomography with intravenous contrast material application in experimental aneurysms: comparison with multislice CT and conventional angiography. Acta Radiol 2010; 51: 431-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841851003660073
  22. Kallmes DF, Helm GA, Hudson SB, Altes TA, Do HM, Mandell JW, et al. Histologic evaluation of platinum coil embolization in an aneurysm model in rabbits. Radiology 1999; 213: 217-22. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc16217
  23. Qu XM, Li G, Ludlow JB, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 770-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.06.013
  24. Carrafiello G, Dizonno M, Colli V, Strocchi S, Pozzi Taubert S, Leonardi A, et al. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography. Radiol Med 2010; 115: 600-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0520-5
  25. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367-78. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/15779208
  26. Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Scheer M, Keeve E, et al. The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations on image quality of cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: e108-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.011
  27. Miyayama S, Yamashiro M, Hattori Y, Orito N, Matsui K, Tsuji K, et al. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Jpn J Radiol 2011; 29: 371-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0568-8
  28. Miyayama S, Matsui O, Yamashiro M, Ryu Y, Takata H, Takeda T, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma by CT during arterial portography using a cone-beam CT technology: comparison with conventional CTAP. Abdom Imaging 2009; 34: 502-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9254-9
  29. Kyriakou Y, Richter G, Dorfler A, Kalender WA. Neuroradiologic applications with routine C-arm flat panel detector CT: evaluation of patient dose measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1930-6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1237
  30. Struffert T, Hertel V, Kyriakou Y, Krause J, Engelhorn T, Schick B, et al. Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Acta Otolaryngol 2010; 130: 443-52. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016480903292700

피인용 문헌

  1. Clinical Application of Cone Beam Computed Tomography of the Rabbit Head: Part 2—Dental Disease vol.4, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00005
  2. Evaluation of the diagnostic yield of dental radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of anatomic landmarks in small to medium-sized brachycephalic dogs vol.79, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.79.1.54
  3. Estimation of contrast-to-noise ratio in CT and CBCT images with varying scan settings in presence of different implant materials vol.48, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190139
  4. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different dental restorative materials: an in-vitro cone beam computed tomography study vol.54, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200079