Biomaterials Research (생체재료학회지)

Korean Society for Biomaterials (한국생체재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance of universal adhesives on bonding to leucite-reinforced ceramic

  • Kim, Ryan Jin-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Woo, Jung-Soo (Dental Research Institute and School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yi, Young-Ah (Department of Dentistry, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital) ;
  • Hwang, Ji-Yun (Nutrition Education Major, Graduate School of Education, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Seo, Deog-Gyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2015.01.10
  • Accepted : 2015.04.13
  • Published : 2015.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the microshear bond strength of universal bonding adhesives to leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic. Methods: Leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic blocks were polished and etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 1 min. The specimens were assigned to one of four groups based on their surface conditioning (n = 16): 1) NC: negative control with no further treatment; 2) SBU: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE); 3) ABU: ALL-BOND Universal (Bisco); and 4) PC: RelyX Ceramic Primer and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive (3M ESPE) as a positive control. RelyX Ultimate resin cement (3M ESPE) was placed on the pretreated ceramic and was light cured. Eight specimens from each group were stored in water for 24 h, and the remaining eight specimens were thermocycled 10,000 times prior to microshear bond strength evaluation. The fractured surfaces were examined by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: After water storage and thermocycling, the microshear bond strength values decreased in the order of PC > SBU and ABU > NC (P < 0.05). Thermocycling significantly reduced the microshear bond strength, regardless of the surface conditioning used (P < 0.05). Cohesive failure in the ceramic and mixed failure in the ceramic and resin cement were observed in the fractured specimens. The percentage of specimens with cohesive failure after 24 h of water storage was: NC (50%), SBU (75%), ABU (75%), and PC (87%). After thermocycling, the percentage of cohesive failure in NC decreased to 25%; however, yet the percentages of the other groups remained the same. Conclusions: Although the bond strength between resin and hydrofluoric acid-etched glass ceramic was improved when universal adhesives were used, conventional surface conditioning using a separate silane and adhesive is preferable to a simplified procedure that uses only a universal adhesive for cementation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References

  1. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater. 2005;21:262-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.009
  2. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent. 1998;26:53-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00078-4
  3. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4:17-23.
  4. Barghi N. To silanate or not to silanate: making a clinical decision. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21:659-62.
  5. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent. 1998;23:250-7.
  6. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  7. Suh BI. Principles of adhesion dentistry - a theoretical and clinical guide for dentists : current issues in adhesion dentistry, classification, curing, compatibility and sensitivity. 1st ed. AEGIS Communications: Newtown, PA; 2012.
  8. Hattan MA, Pani SC, Alomari M. Composite bonding to stainless steel crowns using a new universal bonding and single-bottle systems. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:607405.
  9. Kalavacharla V, Lawson N, Ramp L, Burgess J. Influence of Etching Protocol and Silane Treatment with a Universal Adhesive on Lithium Disilicate Bond Strength. Operative Dent 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
  10. Kim JH, Chae SY, Lee Y, Han GJ, Cho BH. Effects of Multipurpose, Universal Adhesives on Resin Bonding to Zirconia Ceramic. Oper Dent. 2015;40:55-62. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-303-L
  11. McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, et al. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces. Biomaterials. 2002;23:3603-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00089-3
  12. Fabianelli A, Pollington S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Ferrari M, et al. The effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between leucite reinforced feldspathic ceramic and composite resin. J Dent. 2010;38:39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.010
  13. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhesive Dent. 2000;2:305-13.
  14. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater. 2012;28:467-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
  15. Soderholm KJ, Shang SW. Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res. 1993;72:1050-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720061001
  16. Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Effect of incorporating BisGMA resin on the bonding properties of silane and zirconia primers. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110:402-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.04.005
  17. Kadoma Y. Surface treatment agent for dental metals using a thiirane monomer and a phosphoric acid monomer. Dent Mater J. 2002;21:156-69. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.156
  18. Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent. 2012;25:103-8.
  19. Shin YJ, Shin Y, Yi YA, Kim J, Lee IB, Cho BH, et al. Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Y-TZP Ceramic After Different Surface Treatments. Scanning. 2014;36:479-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21142
  20. Yi YA, Ahn JS, Park YJ, Jun SH, Lee IB, Cho BH, et al. The Effect of Sandblasting and Different Primers on Shear Bond Strength Between Yttria-tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal Ceramic and a Self-adhesive Resin Cement. Oper Dent. 2014;40:63-71.
  21. Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;77:28-33.
  22. Aledris A, Aljabr A, Cooley RL, Barghi N. Sem Evaluation of Etch Patterns by 3 Etchants on 3 Porcelains. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:734-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90307-X

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Microshear Bond Strength on Leucite-Reinforced Glass-Ceramic with/without Pure Silane Primer or Universal Adhesive Surface Treatment vol.2015, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/361893
  2. Performance of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns After Endodontic Treatment and Different Repair Strategies vol.43, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2341/17-063-l
  3. Efficacy of prostheses bonding using silane incorporated to universal adhesives or applied separately: A systematic review vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_144_18
  4. Impact of Silane-containing Universal Adhesive on the Biaxial Flexural Strength of a Resin Cement/Glass-ceramic System vol.44, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2341/17-356-l
  5. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems vol.23, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2678-5
  6. Effect of different surface treatments and multimode adhesive application on the Weibull characteristics, wettability, surface topography and adhesion to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic vol.28, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0122
  7. The comparison of shear bond strength of metal orthodontics bracket to porcelain surface using silane and single bond: An in vitro study vol.12, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_52_20
  8. Effects of Universal Adhesive on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Zirconia Ceramic with Different Surface Treatments vol.2021, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5517382