Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제8권3호
  • /
  • Pages.801-820
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vulnerability assessment and retrofit solutions of precast industrial structures

  • 투고 : 2014.01.24
  • 심사 : 2014.04.19
  • 발행 : 2015.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The seismic sequence which hit the Northern Italian territory in 2012 produced extensive damage to reinforced concrete (RC) precast buildings typically adopted as industrial facilities. The considered damaged buildings are constituted by one-storey precast structures with RC columns connected to the ground by means of isolated socket foundations. The roof structural layout is composed of pre-stressed RC beams supporting pre-stressed RC floor elements, both designed as simply supported beams. The observed damage pattern, already highlighted in previous earthquakes, is mainly related to insufficient connection strength and ductility or to the absence of mechanical devices, being the connections designed neglecting seismic loads or neglecting displacement and rotation compatibility between adjacent elements. Following the vulnerabilities emerged in past seismic events, the paper investigates the seismic performance of industrial facilities typical of the Italian territory. The European building code seismic assessment methodologies are presented and discussed, as well as the retrofit interventions required to achieve an appropriate level of seismic capacity. The assessment procedure and retrofit solutions are applied to a selected case study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arslan, M.H., Korkmaz, H.H. and Gulay, F.G. (2006), "Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and shortfalls of the Turkish Earthquake Code", Eng. Fail. Anal., 13(4), 537-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.02.006
  2. ASCE (2013), Technical Committee on Structural Identification. Structural Identification of Constructed Systems: Approaches, Methods, and Technologies for Effective Practice of St-Id, Eds. F.N., Catbas, T., Kijewski-Correa, and A.E., Aktan, ASCE.
  3. Belleri, A., Torquati, M. and Riva, P. (2012), "Displacement based assessment for precast concrete structures: application to a three story plane frame", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
  4. Belleri, A., Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R., Pagani, M. and Riva, P. (2014), "Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory", J. Perform. Construct. Facil., ASCE, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000617.
  5. Belleri, A., Moaveni, B. and Restrepo, J.I. (2014), "Damage assessment through structural identification of a three-story large-scale precast concrete structure", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2332
  6. Belleri, A., Torquati, M. and Riva, P. (2013), "Seismic performance of ductile connections between precast beams and roof elements", Mag. Concrete Res., 66(11), 553-562. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.13.00092
  7. Bracci, J.M., Kunnath, S.K. and Reinhorn, A.M. (1997), "Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures", J. Struct. Eng., 123(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3)
  8. Brunesi, E., Bolognini, D. and Nascimbene, R. (2014), "Evaluation of the shear capacity of precastprestressed hollow core slabs: numerical and experimental comparisons", Mater. Struct., 1-19.
  9. CEN (2004), EN 1998-1:2004, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  10. CEN (2005a), EN 1998-3:2005, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  11. CEN (2005b), EN 1996-1-1:2005, Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures - Part 1-1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  12. Chiarabba, C., Amato, A., Anselmi, M., Baccheschi, P., Bianchi, I., Cattaneo, M. and Valoroso, L. (2009), "The 2009 L'Aquila (central Italy) Mw6.3 earthquake: Main shock and aftershocks", Geophys. Res. Lett., 36(18), doi:10.1029/2009GL039627.
  13. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  14. D.M. 14/01/2008, Italian Building Code (2008), Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. (in Italian)
  15. D.M. 3/12/1987, Italian Building Code (1987), Norme tecniche per la progettazione, esecuzione e collaudo delle costruzioni prefabbricate. (in Italian)
  16. Decanini, L., Mollaioli, F., Mura, A. and Saragoni R. (2004), "Seismic performance of masonry infilled RC frames", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
  17. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1996), "The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::AID-EQE534>3.0.CO;2-V
  18. Fan, W. and Qiao, P. (2011), "Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study", Struct. Hlth. Monit., 10(1), 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921710365419
  19. Farrar, C.R. and Worden, K. (2007), "An introduction to structural health monitoring", Philosophic. Transact. Roy. Soc., 365(1851), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1928
  20. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  21. Gruppo di Lavoro (2012), "Linee di indirizzo per interventi locali e globali su edifici industriali monopiano non progettati con criteri antisismici", Available from: http://www.reluis.it/images/stories/Linee_di_indirizzo_GDL_Capannoni.pdf.
  22. Iverson, J.K. and Hawkins, N.M. (1994), "Performance of precast/prestressed concrete building structures during Northridge earthquake", PCI J., 39(2), 38-56.
  23. Kreslin, M. and Fajfar, P. (2011), "The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(14), 1571-1589. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1104
  24. Lauciani, V., Faenza, L. and Michelini, A. (2012), "ShakeMaps during the Emilia sequence", Ann. Geophys., 55(4), 631-637.
  25. Liberatore, L., Sorrentino, L., Liberatore, D. and Decanini, L.D. (2013), "Failure of industrial structures induced by the Emilia (Italy) 2012 earthquakes", Eng. Fail. Anal., 34, 629-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.009
  26. Magliulo, G., Capozzi, V., Fabbrocino, G. and Manfredi, G. (2011), "Neoprene-concrete friction relationships for seismic assessment of existing precast buildings", Eng. Struct., 33(2), 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.011
  27. Magliulo, G., Ercolino, M., Petrone, C., Coppola, O. and Manfredi, G. (2014), "Emilia Earthquake: the Seismic Performance of Precast RC Buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 30(2), 891-912. https://doi.org/10.1193/091012EQS285M
  28. Magliulo, G., Fabbrocino, G. and Manfredi, G. (2008), "Seismic assessment of existing precast industrial buildings using static and dynamic nonlinear analyses", Eng. Struct., 30(9), 2580-2588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.02.003
  29. Muguruma, H., Nishiyama, M. and Watanabe, F. (1995), "Lessons learned from the Kobe earthquake - a Japanese perspective", PCI J., 40(4), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011995.28.42
  30. O.P.C.M 3274 30/3/2003 (2003), Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche. (in Italian)
  31. Papanicolaou, C.G., Triantafillou, T.C., Papathanasiou, M. and Karlos, K. (2008), "Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading", Mater. Struct., 41(1), 143-157 https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9226-0
  32. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  33. Senel, S.M. and Palanci, M. (2013), "Structural aspects and seismic performance of 1-Story precast buildings in Turkey", J. Perform. Construct. Facil., 27(4), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000316
  34. Smith, B.S. (1962), "Lateral stiffness of infilled frames", J. Struct. Div., 88(6), 183-199.
  35. Toniolo, G. and Colombo, A. (2012), "Precast concrete structures: the lessons learned from the L'Aquila earthquake", Struct. Concrete, 13(2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201100052
  36. Vamvatisikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  37. Zheng, W. and Oliva, M.G. (2005), "A practical method to estimate elastic deformation of precast pretopped double-tee diaphragms", PCI J., 50(2), 44-55.

피인용 문헌

  1. Precast industrial buildings in Southern Europe: loss of support at frictional beam-to-column connections under seismic actions vol.16, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0196-5
  2. Evaluation of out-of-plane seismic performance of column-to-column precast concrete cladding panels in one-storey industrial buildings vol.47, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2956
  3. The Influence of Overhead Cranes in the Seismic Performance of Industrial Buildings vol.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00064
  4. Failure of a precast RC building due to Emilia-Romagna earthquakes vol.118, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.054
  5. Observational failure analysis of precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquakes vol.11, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.327
  6. Influence of modelling assumptions in the expected loss evaluation of a precast industrial building vol.199, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.499
  7. Simplified building models as advanced seismic screening tools for steel industrial buildings vol.138, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.06.027
  8. Seismic behavior of an industrial steel structure retrofitted with self-centering hysteretic dampers vol.139, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.025
  9. Seismic assessment of existing precast structures with dry-friction beam-to-column joints 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0271-y
  10. Dissipating and re-centring devices for portal-frame precast structures vol.150, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.072
  11. Cyclic shear tests on RC precast beam-to-column connections retrofitted with a three-hinged steel device vol.15, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0114-x
  12. Seismic design and performance of dry-assembled precast structures with adaptable joints vol.106, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.016
  13. Seismic fragility functions of industrial precast building classes vol.118, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.069
  14. Seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings with dowel pin connections vol.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.06.013
  15. Horizontal cladding panels: in-plane seismic performance in precast concrete buildings vol.14, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9861-8
  16. Cyclic response of hammer-head strap cladding-to-structure connections used in RC precast building vol.119, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.002
  17. Displacement based design for precast concrete frames with not-emulative connections vol.141, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.020
  18. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of an Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame Structure Designed for Gravity Loads vol.21, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1172372
  19. Diaphragm effectiveness of precast concrete structures with cladding panels under seismic action pp.1573-1456, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0452-3
  20. Displacement-Based Seismic Assessment for Precast Concrete Frames with Non-Emulative Connections pp.1559-808X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1475311
  21. The Influence of Dowel-Pin Connections on the Seismic Fragility Assessment of RC Precast Industrial Buildings vol.11, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501711011138
  22. Performance evaluation of a seismic retrofitted R.C. precast industrial building vol.12, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.013
  23. Seismic fragility curves of single storey RC precast structures by comparing different Italian codes vol.12, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.3.359
  24. Effects of diaphragm flexibility on the seismic design acceleration of precast concrete diaphragms vol.25, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.25.3.273
  25. Displacement-Based Simplified Seismic Loss Assessment of Italian Precast Buildings vol.24, pp.suppl1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1724215
  26. Verification of diaphragm seismic design factors for precast concrete office buildings vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.1.013
  27. Recent Advances in the Research of the Seismic Response of RC Precast Buildings at the University of Ljubljana vol.7, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.630952
  28. Seismic Retrofitting Solutions for Precast RC Industrial Buildings Struck by the 2012 Earthquakes in Northern Italy vol.7, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.631315
  29. Multi-Stripe Seismic Assessment of Precast Industrial Buildings With Cladding Panels vol.7, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.631360
  30. Crescent-Moon Beam-To-Column Connection for Precast Industrial Buildings vol.7, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.645497
  31. Parametric study on module wall-core system of concrete modular high-rises considering the influence of vertical inter-module connections vol.241, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112436
  32. An AHP model for multiple-criteria prioritization of seismic retrofit solutions in gravity-designed industrial buildings vol.45, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103493