DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Hydraulic Pressure on Organic Fouling in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) Process

압력지연삼투 (PRO) 공정에서 유도용액에서의 압력이 유기물 파울링에 미치는 영향

  • Suh, Dongwoo (World Class University (WCU) Program of Chemical Convergence for Energy & Environment (C2E2), School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Institute of Chemical Processes (ICP)) ;
  • Yoon, Hongsik (World Class University (WCU) Program of Chemical Convergence for Energy & Environment (C2E2), School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Institute of Chemical Processes (ICP)) ;
  • Yoon, Jeyong (World Class University (WCU) Program of Chemical Convergence for Energy & Environment (C2E2), School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Institute of Chemical Processes (ICP))
  • 서동우 (서울대학교 공과대학 화학생물공학부 에너지환경화학융합기술) ;
  • 윤홍식 (서울대학교 공과대학 화학생물공학부 에너지환경화학융합기술) ;
  • 윤제용 (서울대학교 공과대학 화학생물공학부 에너지환경화학융합기술)
  • Received : 2014.12.05
  • Accepted : 2015.02.15
  • Published : 2015.02.15

Abstract

Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process is one of membrane processes for harvesting renewable energy by using salinity difference between feed and draw solutions. Power is generated by permeation flux multiplied by hydraulic pressure in draw side. Membrane fouling phenomena in PRO process is presumed to be less sever, but it is inevitable. Membrane fouling in PRO process decreases water permeation through membrane, resulting in significant power production decline. This study intended to investigate the effect of hydraulic pressure in PRO process on alginate induced organic fouling as high and low hydraulic pressures (6.5 bar and 12 bar) were applied for 24 h under the same initial water flux. In addition, organic fouling in draw side from the presence of foulant (sodium alginate) in draw solution was examined. As major results, hydraulic pressure was found to be not a significant factor affecting in PRO organic fouling as long as the same initial water flux is maintained, inidicating that operating PRO process with high hydraulic pressure for efficient energy harvesting will not cause severe organic fouling. In addition, flux decline was negligible from the presence of organic foulant in draw side.

Keywords

References

  1. Loeb, S. (1976) Production of energy from concentrated brines by pressure retarded osmosis. I. Preliminary technical and economic correlations. J.MEMBR.SCI. 1(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82257-7
  2. Achilli, A., Prante, J.L., Hancock, N.T., Maxwell, E.B. and Childress, A.E. (2014) Experimental Results from RO-PRO: A Next Generation System for Low-Energy Desalination. Environmental Science & Technology 48(11), 6437-6443. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405556s
  3. Lin, S., Yip, N.Y., Cath, T.Y., Osuji, C.O. and Elimelech, M. (2014) Hybrid pressure retarded osmosis-membrane distillation system for power generation from low-grade heat: Thermodynamic analysis and energy efficiency. Environmental Science and Technology 48(9), 5306-5313. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405173b
  4. Prante, J.L., Ruskowitz, J.A., Childress, A.E. and Achilli, A. (2014) RO-PRO desalination: An integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination. Applied Energy 120, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.013
  5. Kim, J., Park, M., Snyder, S.A. and Kim, J.H. (2013) Reverse osmosis (RO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) hybrid processes: Model-based scenario study. Desalination 322, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.05.010
  6. Fritzmann, C., Lowenberg, J., Wintgens, T. and Melin, T. (2007) State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 216(1-3), 1-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.009
  7. Baker, J.S. and Dudley, L.Y. (1998) Biofouling in membrane systems - a review. Desalination 118(1-3), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00091-5
  8. Li, Q. and Elimelech, M. (2004) Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: Measurements and mechanisms. Environmental Science and Technology 38(17), 4683-4693. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0354162
  9. Zularisam, A.W., Ismail, A.F. and Salim, R. (2006) Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment - a review. Desalination 194(1-3), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.030
  10. Fan, L., Harris, J.L., Roddick, F.A. and Booker, N.A. (2001) Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Water Research 35(18), 4455-4463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00183-X
  11. Meng, F., Chae, S.-R., Drews, A., Kraume, M., Shin, H.-S. and Yang, F. (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Research 43(6), 1489-1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044
  12. Hong, S. and Elimelech, M. (1997) Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 132(2), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00060-4
  13. She, Q., Jin, X., Li, Q. and Tang, C.Y. (2012) Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes. Water Research 46(7), 2478-2486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.024
  14. Mi, B. and Elimelech, M. (2008) Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 320(1-2), 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.036
  15. Parida, V. and Ng, H.Y. (2013) Forward osmosis organic fouling: Effects of organic loading, calcium and membrane orientation. Desalination 312, 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.029
  16. Thelin, W.R., Sivertsen, E., Holt, T. and Brekke, G. (2013) Natural organic matter fouling in pressure retarded osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 438, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.020
  17. She, Q., Hou, D., Liu, J., Tan, K.H. and Tang, C.Y. (2013) Effect of feed spacer induced membrane deformation on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis (PRO): Implications for PRO process operation. Journal of Membrane Science 445, 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.061
  18. Zhang, M., Hou, D., She, Q. and Tang, C.Y. (2014) Gypsum scaling in pressure retarded osmosis: Experiments, mechanisms and implications. Water Research 48(0), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.051
  19. Zhao, S., Zou, L., Tang, C.Y. and Mulcahy, D. (2012) Recent developments in forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Membrane Science 396, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023
  20. McCutcheon, J.R. and Elimelech, M. (2008) Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science 318(1-2), 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.021
  21. Lay, W.C.L., Chong, T.H., Tang, C.Y., Fane, A.G., Zhang, J. and Liu, Y. (2010) Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: Investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon, pp. 927-936.

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of water permeability of forward osmosis membranes using osmotically driven membrane test vol.30, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2016.30.4.417