Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 37
  • /
  • Pages.21.1-21.8
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A novel method for the management of proximal segment using computer assisted simulation surgery: correct condyle head positioning and better proximal segment placement

  • Lee, Yong-Chan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bestian Seoul Hospital) ;
  • Sohn, Hong-Bum (Department of Orthodontics, Eton Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Keun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bestian Seoul Hospital) ;
  • Bae, On-Yu (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bestian Seoul Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jang-Ha (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • Received : 2015.07.27
  • Accepted : 2015.07.29
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Computer Assisted Simulation Surgery (CASS) is a reliable method that permits oral and maxillofacial surgeons to visualize the position of the maxilla and the mandible as observed in the patient. The purpose of this report was to introduce a newly developed strategy for proximal segment management according to Balanced Orthognathic Surgery (BOS) protocol which is a type of CASS, and to establish the clinical feasibility of the BOS protocol in the treatment of complex maxillo-facial deformities. The BOS protocol consists of the following 4 phases: 1) Planning and simulation phase, 2) Modeling phase, 3) Surgical phase, and 4) Evaluation phase. The surgical interventions in 80 consecutive patients were planned and executed by the BOS protocol. The BOS protocol ensures accuracy during surgery, thereby facilitating the completion of procedures without any complications. The BOS protocol may be a complete solution that enables an orthognatic surgeon to perform accurate surgery based on a surgical plan, making real outcomes as close to pre-planned outcomes as possible.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim SJ, Lee KJ, Yu HS, Jung YS, Baik HS (2015) Three-dimensional effect of pitch, roll, and yaw rotations on maxillomandibular complex movement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(2):264-273 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.022
  2. Ritto FG, Ritto TG, Ribeiro DP, Medeiros PJ, de Moraes M (2014) Accuracy of maxillary positioning after standard and inverted orthognathic sequencing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 117:567-574 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.016
  3. Gimenez CM, Bertoz FA, Gabrielli MA, Magro Fiho O, Garcia I, Pereirra Fiho VA (2013) Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study. Dental Press J Orthod 18:53-58
  4. Prisse LA, Courvoisier DS, Scolozzi P (2013) Did the hand drawn cephalometric tracing technique for orthognathic surgery planning say its last word? Objective and subjective evaluation. J Craniofac Surg 24:e320-e325 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828a7698
  5. Kim SH, Kim DS, Huh KH, Lee SS, Heo MS, Choi SC et al (2013) Direct and continuous localization of anatomical landmarks for image-guided orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 116:402-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.023
  6. Shokri A, Khajeh S, Khavid A (2014) Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study. J Craniofac Surg 25:1710-1713 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000908
  7. Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF (2009) New clinical protocol to evaluate craniomaxillofacial deformity and plan surgical correction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(10):2093-2106 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.057
  8. Patel PK, Novia MV (2007) The surgical tools: the LeFort I, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible, and the osseous genioplasty. Clin Plast Surg 34(3):447-475 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.012
  9. Becktor JP, Rebellato J, Becktor KB, Isaksson S, VickersPD KEE (2002) Transverse displacement of the proximalsegment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60(4):395-403 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.31227
  10. Alder ME, Deahl ST, Matteson SR, Van Sickels JE, Tiner BD, Rugh JD (1999) Short-term changes of condylar position aftersagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio lEndod 87(2):159-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70266-0
  11. Ellis E 3rd, Hinton RJ (1990) Histologic examination of thetemporomandibular joint after mandibular advancementwith and without rigid fixation: An experimentalinvestigation in adult Macacamulatta. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49(12):1316-1327 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90311-9
  12. Arnett GW, Tamborello JA (1990) Progressive Class II development.Female idiopathic condylar resorption. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia,Pa
  13. Arnett GW (1993) A redefinition of bilateral sagittal osteotomy(BSO) advancement relapse. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104(5):506-515 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93)70076-Z
  14. Lake SL, McNeill RW, Little RM, West RA (1981) Surgicalmandibular advancement: Acephalometric analysis oftreatment response. Am J Orthod 80(4):376-394 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90173-1
  15. Bettega G, Cinquin P, Lebeau J, Raphael B (2002) Computerassistedorthognathic surgery: Clinical evaluation ofa mandibular condyle repositioning system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60(1):27-34, discussion 34-5 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.29069
  16. Epker BN, Wylie GA (1986) Control of the condylar-proximalmandibular segments after sagittal split osteotomiesto advance the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62(6):613-617 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90251-3
  17. Gassmann CJ, Van Sickels JE, Thrash WJ (1990) Causes, location, and timing of relapsefollowing rigid fixation aftermandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(5):450-454 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90229-U
  18. Yang HJ, Hwang SJ (2015) Bone mineral density and mandibular advancement as contributing factors for postoperative relapse after orthognathic surgery in patients with preoperative idiopathic condylar resorption: a prospective study with preliminary 1-year follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 120(2):112-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.03.004
  19. Breuel W, Krause M, Schneider M, Harzer W (2013) Genetic stretching factors in masseter muscle after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51(6):530-535 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.11.009
  20. Convens JM, Kiekens RM, Kuijpers-Jaqtman AM, Fudalei PS (2015) Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(5):609-614 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.12.015
  21. Schendel SA, Epker BN (1980) Results after mandibular advancement surgery: an analysis of 87 cases. J Oral Surg 38(4):265-282
  22. Rotskoff KS, Herbosa EG, Villa P (1991) Maintenance of condyleproximalsegment position in orthognathic surgery. JOral Maxillofac Surg 49(1):2-7, discussion 7-8
  23. Hsu SS, Gateno J, Bell RB, Hirsch DL, Markiewicz MR, Teichgraeber JF et al (2013) Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71(1):128-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.027
  24. Baker SB, Goldstein JA, Seruya M (2012) Outcomes in computer-assisted surgical simulation for orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 23(2):509-513 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824cd46b
  25. Schwartz HC (2014) Does computer-aided surgical simulation improve efficiency in bimaxillaryorthognathic surgery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(5):572-576 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.018
  26. Liebregts J, Xi T, Timmermans M, de Koning M, Berge S, Hoppenreijs T et al (2015) Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue simulation in bimaxillary osteotomies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:329-335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.12.012
  27. Borba AM, Ribeiro-Junior O, Brozoski MA, Ce PS, Espinosa MM, Deboni MC et al (2014) Accuracy of perioperative mandibular positions in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:972-979 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.04.017
  28. Schendel SA, Jacobson R, Khalessi S (2013) 3-dimensional facial simulation in orthognathic surgery: is it accurate? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:1406-1414 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.02.010
  29. Barrera JE (2014) Virtual surgical planning improves surgical outcome measures in obstructive sleep apnea surgery. Laryngoscope 124:1259-1266 https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24501
  30. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martinez R (2013) New protocol for three-dimensional surgical planning and CAD/CAM splint generation in orthognathic surgery: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:1547-1556 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.025
  31. Hammoudeh JA, Howell LK, Boutros S, Scott MA, Urata MM (2015) Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3, e307 https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184

Cited by

  1. Postoperative Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Mandibular Contouring Surgery Using Computer-Assisted Simulation Planning and a Three-Dimensional-Printed Surgical Guide vol.28, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003442
  2. Occlusion-Fit Three-Dimensional–Printed Zygoma Repositioner vol.29, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004315
  3. Three-Dimensional Virtual Treatment Planning: Presurgical Evaluation vol.29, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004455
  4. Surgery-first orthognathic surgery with computer assisted three-dimensional planning vol.24, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2018.10.007
  5. A Rare Case of Solitary Osteochondroma at the Temporomandibular Joint: A Case Report vol.12, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5856/jkds.2019.12.2.66
  6. The Using Virtual Computer-Assisted Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.20, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2020.064
  7. Surgery-First Approach in a Case of Mandibular Asymmetry vol.9, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4103/ejgd.ejgd_133_20
  8. Full Digital Surgery-First, Skeletal Anchorage and Aligners Approach to Correct a Gummy Smile and Class II Malocclusion with Mandibular Retrusion and Deviation vol.11, pp.21, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219985