Journal of Forest and Environmental Science

Institute of Forest Science, kangwon National University (강원대학교 산림과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Status, Utilization and Economic Valuation of Non-timber Forest Products of Arunachal Pradesh, India

  • Sharma, Dhruba (Regional Centre, National Afforestation and Eco-development Board, North-Eastern Hill University) ;
  • Tiwari, B.K. (Department of Environmental Studies, North-Eastern Hill University) ;
  • Chaturvedi, S.S. (Department of Environmental Studies, North-Eastern Hill University) ;
  • Diengdoh, Evamary (Regional Centre, National Afforestation and Eco-development Board, North-Eastern Hill University)
  • Received : 2014.05.29
  • Accepted : 2014.08.06
  • Published : 2015.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Non-timber forest products are important component of subsistence and livelihood of tribal communities living in and near forests. This is of particular significance in the state of Arunachal Pradesh having more than 80% of geographical area under forest cover and predominantly inhabited by tribal people. Purpose of this study was to document the status and utilization pattern and to assess the economic value of NTFPs of the state. Present study was carried out in eight districts of Arunachal Pradesh viz., Changlang, East Kameng, Lower Subansiri, Tawang, Tirap, Upper Siang, West Kameng and West Siang covering 34 villages and 350 households. Altogether, 135 plant based and 36 animal based non-timber forest products were recorded. Among plant based NTFPs, 54 species were collected for leaves, 30 for stem and 22 for fruits. Most of the animal based NTFPs (93%) were collected/hunted for food. Average 20~40 kg of NTFPs was collected annually per household. Maximum plant based NTFP collection was recorded from West Siang followed by West Kameng and Tawang. Similarly, highest collection of animal based NTFPs was recorded from West Siang followed by Tirap and Lower Subansiri. NTFP contributed more than 50% of annual income of the people of East Kameng, Tirap, Lower Subansiri and Upper Siang districts. An illiterate and unemployed person with minimum agricultural land was more dependent on forests for his livelihood than a literate jobholder. The study concludes that a large section of people of Arunachal Pradesh are dependent on NTFPs for their livelihood however due to its unscientific harvesting, the availability of NTFPs is receding with time. There is an urgent need to promote cultivation and scientific harvesting of NTFPs in order to conserve the plant and animal diversity of this global biodiversity hotspot and for ensuring livelihood security of the people living in this area.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander SJ, McLain RJ, Blanter KA. 2001. Socio-economic research on non-timber forest products in the Pacific Northwest. J Sustain Forest 13: 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1300/J091v13n03_09
  2. Alexander SJ, Pilz D, Weber NS, Brown E, Rockwell VA. 2002. Mushrooms, trees, and money: Value estimates of commercial mushrooms and timber in the Pacific Northwest. Environ Manage 30: 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2610-1
  3. Ambrose-Oji B. 2003. The contribution of NTFPs to the livelihoods of the forest poor: evidence from the tropical forest zone of south-west Cameroon. Int For Rev 5: 106-117.
  4. Bhardwaj S, Gakhar SK. 2008. Ethnobotanicals used by tribals of Mizoram for furniture and household equipments. Indian J Tradi Knowledge 7: 134-137.
  5. Borthakur SK. 1997. Plants in the folklore and folk life of the Karbis (Mikirs) of Assam. In: Contribution to Indian Ethnobotany Vol 1 (Jain SK, ed). 2nd ed. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India, pp 169-178.
  6. Chettri N, Sharma E, Lama SD. 2005. Non-timber forest produces utilization, distribution and status in a trekking corridor of Sikkim, India. Iyonia 1: 89-101.
  7. Chopra K. 1993. The value of non-timber forest products: An estimation for tropical deciduous forests in India. Econ Bot 47: 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862291
  8. Das BK. 2005. Role of NTFPs among forest villagers in a protected area of West Bengal. J Hum Ecol 18: 129-136.
  9. Das HK, Majumdar K, Datta BK, Ray D. 2009. Ethnobotanical uses of some plants by Tripuri and Reang tribes of Tripura. Nat Prod Rad 8: 172-180.
  10. Dhyani PP, Khali MP. 1993. Fruit yield and economics of jelly and jam production from fruits of some promising Ficus (Fig) tree crops. Ecol Food Nutr 30: 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1993.9991334
  11. FAO. 1992. Forests, Trees and Food. FAO, Rome.
  12. Gangwar AK, Ramakrishnan PS. 1990. Ethnobiological Notes on Some Tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, North-eastern India. Econ Bot 44: 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861071
  13. GBPIHED. 2007. http://gbpihed.gov.in/Northeast_unit.htm
  14. Hegde NG, Daniel JN. 1992. Promotion of non wood forest produces through social forestry. Proceedings of a National Workshop held in March 8-11, 1992. BAIF Development Research Foundation, Pune, India.
  15. Hegde R, Suryaprakash S, Achoth L, Bawa KS. 1996. Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India: 1. contribution to rural income. Econ Bot 50: 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907328
  16. Lalfalzuala R, Lalramnghinglova H, Kayang H. 2007. Ethnobotanical usage of plants in western Mizoram. Indian J Tradi Knowledge 6: 486-493.
  17. Maikhuri RK, Semwal RL, Singh A, Nautiyal MC. 1994. Wild fruits as a contribution to sustainable rural development: a case study from the Garhwal Himalaya. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 1: 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509409469861
  18. Malhotra KC, Deb D, Dutta M, Vasulu TS, Yadav G, Adhikari M. 1991. Role of Non Timber Forest Produce in Village Economy: A Household Survey in Jamboni Range. Mimeographed, Indian Institute of Bio-social Research and Development, Calcutta.
  19. Myers N, Muttermeier RA, Muttermeier CG, de Fonseca GAB, Kents J. 2000. Biodiversity hot-spots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  20. Panayotou T, Ashton P. 1992. Not by timber alone: economics and Ecology for sustaining tropical forests. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  21. Peters CM, Gentry AH, Mendelsohn RO. 1989. Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339: 655-656. https://doi.org/10.1038/339655a0
  22. Phillips O. 1993. The potential for harvesting fruits in tropical rainforest: new data from Amazonian Peru. Biodiversity Conserv 2: 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055100
  23. Prasad BN. 1985. Regional non wood forest product industries. Forest Industries Development Group. Asia Pacific Region, FAO, Kualalampur.
  24. Rethy P, Singh B, Kagyung R, Gajurel PR. 2010. Ethnobotanical studies of Debang-Debang Biosphere Reserve of Arunachal Pradesh with special reference to Memba tribe. Indian J Tradi Knowledge 9: 61-67.
  25. Saha D, Sundriyal RC. 2013. Perspectives of tribal communities on NTFP resource use in a global hotspot: implications for adaptive management. J Nat Sc Res 3: 125-169.
  26. Sarin M, Ray L, Raju MS, Chatterjee M, Banerjee N, Hiremath S. 1998. Gender and Equity concerns in Joint Forest Management. In: Communities and Conservation (Kothari A, Pathak N, Anuradha RV, Taneja B, eds). Sage Publications, New Delhi.
  27. Sarmah R. 2006. Non-timber forest products and their utilization pattern in Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh. PhD thesis. Rajiv Gandhi University, Itanagar, India.
  28. Sarmah R. 2010. Commonly used non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by the Lisu tribe in Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh, India. J Front Res 5: 68-77.
  29. Saxena NC, Farrington J. 2003. Trends and prospects for poverty reduction in rural India: context and options. Working paper, London: Overseas Development Institute. UK, pp 59.
  30. Sharma P. 1995. Non-wood forest products and integrated mountain development: observations from Nepal. Non-Wood Forest Products, FAO, Rome, Italy, pp 157-166.
  31. Shiva MP. 1995. Collection, utilization and marketing of Medicinal plants from the forests of India. In: Beyond Timber: social, economic and cultural dimensions of non wood forest products in Asia and the Pacific (Patrick B. Durst, Ann Bishop, eds). FAO of the UN, RAP, Bankok.
  32. Singh J, Bhuyan TC, Ahmed A. 1996. Ethnobotanical studies on the Mishing tribes of Assam with special reference to food and medicinal plants. J Econ Tax Bot 12: 350-356.
  33. Sundriyal M, Sundriyal RC, Sharma E. 2004. Dietary use of wild plant resources in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Econ Bot 54: 626-638.
  34. Tiwari BK. 2000. Non-Timber Forest Produce of North East India. J Hum Ecol 11: 445-455.
  35. Tiwari BK, Barik SK, Tripathi RS. 1997. Production and marketing of non-timber forest produce in Karbi-Anglong district of Assam. RCNAEB publication, NEHU, Shillong, pp 20.
  36. Tiwari BK, Kumar C, Lynser MB. 2009. The future of non-wood forest production. Session 3c- Wood and other products. In: The future of forests in Asia and Pacific: Outlook for 2020 (Produced by Regional Office for Asia and Pacific, ed). FAO Corporate Document Repository, UN, Bangkok, Thailand. pp 17-28.

Cited by

  1. Contribution of NTFPs on livelihood of forest-fringe communities in Jaldapara National Park, India pp.1540-756X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2018.1528158