DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of an Efficient Screening System for Resistance of Tomato Cultivars to Ralstonia solanacearum

토마토 풋마름병에 대한 효율적인 저항성 검정 방법 개발

  • Lee, Ji Hyun (Center for Eco-friendly New Materials, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Jang, Kyoung Soo (Center for Eco-friendly New Materials, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Choi, Yong Ho (Center for Eco-friendly New Materials, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Cheol (Division of Applied Bioscience and Biotechnology, Institute of Environmentally-Friendly Agriculture, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Gyung Ja (Center for Eco-friendly New Materials, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
  • 이지현 (한국화학연구원 친환경신물질연구센터) ;
  • 장경수 (한국화학연구원 친환경신물질연구센터) ;
  • 최용호 (한국화학연구원 친환경신물질연구센터) ;
  • 김진철 (전남대학교 응용생물공학부) ;
  • 최경자 (한국화학연구원 친환경신물질연구센터)
  • Received : 2015.10.16
  • Accepted : 2015.12.07
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to establish an efficient screening system for resistant tomato to bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Under several conditions such as inoculation methods, growth stages of tomato seedlings, inoculum concentrations, and incubating temperatures after inoculation, development of bacterial wilt on nine resistant or susceptible cultivars of tomato was investigated. To inoculate by drenching the non-cut roots with the bacterial suspension was better to distinguish resistance and susceptibility of tomato cultivars than by drenching the cut roots using scalpel. And 'Hawaii7996' a resistant tomato to R. solanacearum showed high resistance at all the tested conditions including growth stages (3-, 6-, 8-, 10-leaf stages), inoculum concentrations ($OD_{600}=0.1-0.4$) and incubation temperatures (25, 30, $35^{\circ}C$). On the other hands, susceptible cultivars represented disease index of 3.7 and 3.9 at 6- and 8-leaf stages, respectively. At 3- and 10-leaf stages, the cultivars demonstrated lower disease severity of 2.1 and 0.5, respectively, than at 6- and 8-leaf stages. When the inoculated seedlings were incubated in growth chambers of 25, 30 and $35^{\circ}C$, disease severity of susceptible cultivars was significantly greater at 30 and $35^{\circ}C$ than at $25^{\circ}C$. In addition, the level of resistance of the tomato cultivars was not significantly affected by inoculum concentrations of $OD_{600}=0.1-0.4$. On the basis of the results, we suggest an efficient screening method to measure resistance level of tomato cultivars to bacterial wilt. The eight-leaf stage seedlings transplanted 7 days before inoculation, are inoculated with R. solanacearum by drenching the non-cut roots with a bacterial suspensions ($OD_{600}=0.4$) to give inoculum volume of 50 ml/soil l. The inoculated plants are incubated in a growth room at $30^{\circ}C$ for 12-13 days with 12-hour light a day.

Ralstonia solanacearum에 의해 발생하는 토마토 풋마름병에 대한 효율적인 저항성 검정법을 확립하고자 감수성 및 저항성 토마토 9개 품종의 접종 방법, 토마토의 생육시기, 접종 농도 및 접종 후 재배 온도에 따른 풋마름병 발생을 조사하였다. 상처없이 풋마름병균 현탁액을 관주하여 접종한 토마토는 뿌리에 scalpel로 인위적인 상처를 내고 접종한 토마토보다 감수성과 저항성 반응이 더 분명하게 나타났다. 그리고 저항성 토마토인 'Hwaii7996'은 실험한 모든 조건 즉 접종하는 토마토의 생육 시기(3, 6, 8, 10엽기), 접종 농도($OD_{600}=0.1-0.4$), 접종 후 재배온도(25, 30, $35^{\circ}C$)에서 고도의 저항성을 보였다. 그러나 감수성 품종들은 6엽기와 8엽기 토마토는 각각 3.7과 3.9의 높은 발병도를 보였으나, 3엽기와 10엽기 토마토는 각각 2.1과 0.5로 풋마름병 발생이 낮았다. 그리고 풋마름병균을 접종하고 25, 30, $35^{\circ}C$에 재배하였을 때, 감수성 품종들은 $25^{\circ}C$에서는 0.5 이하의 낮은 발병도를 보였으나 30와 $35^{\circ}C$에서는 각각 3.1과 2.9 이상의 높은 발병도를 나타냈다. 한편, 실험한 감수성 토마토 품종들은 접종원 농도($OD_{600}=0.1-0.4$)와 관계없이 높은 감수성을 나타냈다. 이상의 결과로부터 토마토 풋마름병에 대한 효율적인 저항성 검정 방법으로 접종 1주일 전에 이식하여 재배한 8엽기 토마토 유묘를 사용하여 뿌리에 상처를 내지 않고 풋마름병균 현탁액($OD_{600}=0.4$)을 토양 리터 당 50 ml씩 관주하여 접종하고, $30^{\circ}C$ 생육상에서 하루 12시간씩 광을 조사하면서 12-13일 동안 재배하는 것을 제안하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Acosta, J. C., Gilbert, J. C. and Quinon, V. L. 1964. Heritability of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato. P. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 84: 455-462.
  2. Anand, N., Sadashiva, A. T., Tikoo, S. K., Ramkishun, M. and Reddy, K. 1993. Resistance to bacterial wilt in tomato: gene dosage effects. In: Bacterial Wilt, eds. by G. L. Hartman and A. C. Hayward, pp. 142-148. Hayward ACIAR Proc. 45, Kaoshiung, Taiwan.
  3. Anon. 1975. The Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. Tomato Report for 1975. pp. 25-28.
  4. Buddenhagen, I. and Kelman, A. 1964. Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2: 203-230. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.02.090164.001223
  5. Buddenhagen, I., Sequeira, L. and Kelman, A. 1962. Designation of races in Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 52: 726.
  6. Carmeille, A., Caranta, C., Dintinger, J., Prior, P., Luisetti, J. and Besse, P. 2006. Identification of QTLs for Ralstonia solanacearum race 3-phylotype II resistance in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113: 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0277-3
  7. Danesh, D., Aarons. S., McGill, G. E. and Young, N. D. 1994. Genetic dissection of oligogenic resistance to bacterial wilt in tomato. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 7: 464-471. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-7-0464
  8. Grimault, V., Gelie, B., Lamattre, M., Prior, P. and Schimidt, J. 1994. Comparative histology of resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars infected by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Physiol. Mol. Pathol. 44: 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-5765(05)80105-5
  9. Han, Y., Min, J., Park, J., Han, K., Kim, D., Lee, J. and Kim, H. 2009. Screening of tomato cultivars resistant to bacterial wilts. Res. Plant Dis. 15: 198-201. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2009.15.3.198
  10. Han, Y.-K., Han, K.-S., Lee, S.-C. and Kim, S. 2011. Control of bacterial wilt of tomato using copper hydroxide. Korean J. Pestic. Sci. 15: 298-302. (In Korean)
  11. Hayward, A. C. 1991. Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 29: 6587.
  12. He, L. Y., Sequeira, L. and Kelman, A. 1983. Characteristics of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from China. Plant Dis. 67: 1357-1361. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-67-1357
  13. Jeong, Y., Kim, J., Kang, Y., Lee, S. and Hwang, I. 2007. Genetic diversity and distribution of Korea isolates of Ralstonia solanacearum. Plant Dis. 91: 1277-1287. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-10-1277
  14. Kelman, A. and Sequeira, L. 1965. Root to root spread of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 55: 304-309.
  15. Krausz, J. P. and Thurston, H. D. 1975. Breakdown of resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato. Phytopathology 34: 443-458.
  16. Lee, H. J., Jo, E. J., Kim, N. H., Chae, Y. and Lee, S. W. 2011. Disease responses of tomato pure lines against Ralstonia solanacearum strains from Korea and susceptibility at high temperature. Res. Plant Dis. 17: 326-333. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2011.17.3.326
  17. Mew, T. W. and Ho, W. C. 1976. Varietal resistance to bacterial wilt in tomato. Plant Dis. Rep. 60: 264-268.
  18. Monma, S. and Sakata, Y. 1993. Inheritance of resistance to bacterial wilt in tomato. In: Bacterial Wilt, eds. by G. L. Hartman and A. C. Hayward, pp. 149-153. Hayward ACIAR Proc. 45. Kaoshiung, Taiwan.
  19. Nakaho, K. and Takaya, S. 1993. Resistance of tomato rootstock cultivars to Pseudomonas solanacearum evaluated by infection rate under different testing conditions. In: Bacterial Wilt, eds. by G. L. Hartman and A. C. Hayward, pp. 138-141. Hayward ACIAR Proc. 45, Kaoshiung, Taiwan.
  20. Park, E. J., Lee, S. D., Chung, E. J., Lee, M. H., Um, H. Y., Murugaiyan, S., Moon, B. J. and Lee, S.-W. 2007. MicroTom-A model plant system to study bacterial wilt by Ralstonia solanacearum. Plant Pathol. J. 23: 239-244. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2007.23.4.239
  21. Roberts, P. D., Denny, T. P. and Schell, M. A. 1988. Cloning of the egl gene of Pseudomonas solanacearum and analysis of its role in phytopathogenicity. J. Bacteriol. 170: 1445-1451. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.170.4.1445-1451.1988
  22. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT user' guide, version 6.4th ed. SAS Institute Inc., Gary, N. C.
  23. Sceelathakumary, L. A. and Peter, K. V. 1984. Inheritance of combined wilt resistance in tomato. Tomato Genet. Coop. Rep. 34: 16.
  24. Schaad, N. W., Jones, J. B. and Chun, W. 2001. Laboratory, Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. 3rd ed. APS Press, St. Paul, USA.
  25. Schmit, J. 1978. Microscopic study of early stages of infection by Pseudomonas solanacearum E. F. S. on "in vitro" grown tomato seedlings. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Plant Pathol. Bacteriol. pp. 841-856.
  26. Seo, S. T., Park, J. H., Han, K. S., Cheong, S. R. and Lee, S. 2007. Genetic diversity of Ralstonia solanacearum strain isolated from pepper and tomato plants in Korea. Res. Plant Dis. 13: 24-29. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2007.13.1.024
  27. Singh, K. 1961. Inheritance of North Carolina type of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato Lycopersicon esculentum L.M.S. Thesis. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
  28. Thoquet, P., Olivier, J., Sperisen, C., Rogowsky, P., Laterrot, H. and Grimsley, N. 1996a. Quantitative trait loci determining resistance to bacterial wilt in tomato cultivar Hawaii7996. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9: 826-836. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-9-0826
  29. Thoquet, P., Olivier, J., Sperisen, C., Rogowsky, P., Prior, P., Anais, G., Mangin, B., Bazin, B., Nazer, R. and Grimsley, N. 1996b. Polygenic resistance of tomato plants to bacterial wilt in the French West Indies. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9: 837-842. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-9-0837
  30. Vasse, J., Frey, P. and Trigalet, A. 1995. Microscopic studies of intercellular infection and protoxylem invasion of tomato roots by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 8: 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-8-0241
  31. Walker, J. M. 1967. Hereditary resistance to disease in Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 42: 628-634.
  32. Wang, J.-F., Olivier, J., Thoquet, P., Mangin, B., Sauviac, L. and Grimsley, N. H. 2000. Resistance of tomato line Hawaii7996 to Ralstonia solanacearum Pss4 in Taiwan is controlled mainly by a major strainspecific locus. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 13: 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.1.6
  33. Winstead, N. N. and Kelman, A. 1952. Inoculation techniques for evaluating resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 42: 628-634.