DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Environmental Impact of Tall vs Small: A Comparative Study

  • 발행 : 2015.06.30

초록

The concept of vertical living has been hailed as a solution to control fast growth and urbanization of cities worldwide. As super tall residential projects become more common and sustainability considerations become more necessary, their efficiency has been called into question. How do vertical residential developments compare with suburban homes? What are the environmental advantages and disadvantages of vertical communities? Is there a middle ground? We present the results from an AS+GG study that compares the environmental performance of different housing typologies ranging from a 215 supertall building to single family residences, including several scales in between. Our samples comprise 2,000 residential units per type and include the infrastructure needed to support them. We analyzed land use, energy use, and lifecycle carbon emissions for each typology. The results show that different typologies perform better depending on the parameter being assessed. We discuss these findings; assess overall performance, and present conclusions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brinkhoff. (2014). Major agglomerations of the world, Thomas Brinkhoff [online] http://www.citypopulation.de/world/Agglomerations.html [1st April 2014]
  2. UN. (2014a). Population density (per square kilometer). Source: World population prospects: The 2012 Revision, United Nations [online], Available: http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=PopDiv&f=variableID%3A14 [12th April 2014]
  3. UN. (2014b). World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision and World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 Revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. [Online], Available: http://esa.un.org/unup/unup/p2k0data.asp [12th April 2014]
  4. USCB. (2014). World POPClock Projection. Source United States Census Bureau [online], Available http://esa.un.org/unup/unup/p2k0data.asp [12th April 2014]