DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Diverse Atmospheric Conditions on Optical Properties of a Pulse Laser in a Time-of-Flight Laser Range Finder

  • Shim, Young Bo (Department of Physics and Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kwon, Oh-Jang (Department of Physics and Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Hanyang University) ;
  • Choi, Hyun-Yong (IT Convergence Center, KETI) ;
  • Han, Young-Geun (Department of Physics and Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2014.08.05
  • 심사 : 2014.09.25
  • 발행 : 2015.02.25

초록

We investigate the propagation characteristics of a pulse laser in a time-of-flight laser range finder (TOF-LRF) system with variations in atmospheric conditions, such as temperature, pressure, relative humidity, and the concentration of $CO_2$. The measurement error of distance related with the group velocity change in the TOF-LRF system is analyzed by considering the refractive index of the standard atmosphere with variations in atmospheric conditions. The dependence of the pulse width broadening induced by chromatic dispersion of the standard atmosphere on the operating wavelength and the initial pulse width of the light sources is discussed. The transmission of air with variations in the relative humidity or the concentration of $CO_2$ is analyzed by using different values of absorption coefficients depending on the operation wavelength of the light source in the TOF-LRF system.

키워드

I. INTRODUCTION

The time-of-flight laser range finder (TOF-LRF) system have been attracted in a variety of applications, such as military, geometrical surveying, robotics, and autonomous vehicles in order to measure distance precisely [1]. In the TOF-LRF system, the distance to the target is determined by measuring round trip time after propagating a pulse laser through air [1]. In the TOF-LRF system, a pulse laser with short pulse width can dramatically improve the measurement resolution of distance [2-5]. Recently, a femtosecond laser was implemented for the precise measurement of distance in the TOF-LRF system to effectively improve the resolution [6, 7]. For the TOF-LRF system, however, the main limitation of the precise measurement of distance is the unexpected property change of the pulse laser caused by the variation of the standard atmospheric conditions [8]. The measurement error of distance is usually induced by the variation of group velocity because of the pulse width broadening [8-11]. The refractive index of air is analyzed with respect to the atmospheric conditions [12, 13]. The absorption of air related to the molecules of air constituents is investigated [14-16]. However, it is not enough to analyze the propagation characteristics of the pulse laser traveling in the air including group velocity, pulse width broadening, and transmission. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the propagation characteristics of the pulse laser propagating though the air to improve the performance of the TOF-LRF system. In this paper, we discuss the effect of atmospheric conditions on variations of optical properties of a pulse laser in the TOF-LRF system, such as the measurement error of distance, the pulse width broadening, and the transmission. The measurement error of distance in the TOF-LRF system caused by the group velocity change is analyzed by calculating the refractive index of the standard atmosphere with variations in atmospheric conditions, such as temperature, pressure, relative humidity, and the concentration of CO2. The variation of the pulse width broadening induced by chromatic dispersion of the standard atmosphere is also analyzed depending on the operating wavelength and the initial pulse width of the light source in the TOF-LRF system. The transmission of air with variations in the relative humidity or the concentration of CO2 is theoretically analyzed by using different values of absorption coefficients depending on the operation wavelength of the light source in the TOF-LRF system.

 

II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The variation of the refractive index of air with variations in atmospheric conditions, such as temperature, pressure, relative humidity, and the concentration of CO2, can be theoretically calculated. The refractive index of air (n) can be written as [13],

where, ρa is the mass density of the dry air in the atmosphere, Ma is the molar mass of the dry air, λ0 is the operating wavelength of the light source in the TOF-LRF system, xc is the concentration of CO2, ρw is the mass density of water vapor in the atmosphere, P and T are the pressure and temperature, respectively. xw is the molar fraction of the water vapor, s is the saturation vapor pressure, and h is the relative humidity.

Figures 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), and 1(d) show theoretical results for the refractive index change of air with variations in atmospheric conditions, such as temperature, pressure, humidity, and the concentration of CO2, respectively. To calculate the dependence of the refractive index of air on temperature, three parameters (pressure, humidity, and the concentration of CO2) were kept as constant at the standard atmosphere (pressure: 101.33 kPa, humidity: 0%, and the concentration of CO2: 300 ppm). The increase of temperature reduces the refractive index of air because the active thermal molecular motion in a certain volume diminishes the density of air as seen in Fig. 1(a) [13]. As temperature is changed from -15℃ to 45℃, the variation of refractive index of air is estimated to be ~5.97 × 10-5.

FIG. 1.Theoretical results for the refractive index change of air with variations in atmospheric conditions: (a) temperature, (b) pressure, (c) humidity, and (d) the concentration of CO2.

To analyze the effect of pressure on the refractive index of air, temperature, humidity, and the concentration of CO2 were kept constant to be 15℃, 0%, and 300 ppm, respectively. By considering the ideal gas equation, we can readily expect that the refractive index of air changes to higher values under higher pressure at constant temperature and volume. As pressure is changed from 80 kPa to 120 kPa, the total amount of refractive index variation of air is approximated to be ~1.12 × 10-4 as shown in Fig. 1 (b). By considering the group velocity of air, the target distance (Dt) can be written as [8]

where c0 is the speed of light, and the tg is the travel time of the laser pulse. The dependence of refractive index of air on atmospheric conditions should definitely induce the measurement distance error of the pulse laser in the TOF-LRF system. By using all results in Fig. 1(b) and Eq. (7), it is evident that the variation of refractive index induced by temperature and pressure results in maximum measurement errors of distances of 6.42 mm and 12.01 mm, respectively, for the 200-m round trip distance through air.

Temperature, pressure, and the concentration of CO2 were kept constant to be 15℃, 101.33 kPa, and 300 ppm, respectively, to calculate the variation of the refractive index of air with respect to humidity. The variation of refractive index of air is calculated to be 6.06 × 10-7 as humidity is changed from 0 to 100% as shown in Fig. 1 (c). Humidity decreases the refractive index of air because water vapor has 15% lower refractive index than dry air [17]. As the concentration of CO2 is changed from 0 to 3000 ppm for a fixed humidity of 0%, the variation of refractive index of air is calculated to be 4.53 × 10-7 as shown in Fig. 1 (d). The concentration of CO2 increases the refractive index of air because the air with CO2 has 50% higher refractive index than the air without CO2 [18]. The variation of refractive index induced by humidity and the concentration of CO2 results in maximum measurement errors of distances of 56.86 μm and 48.98 μm, respectively, for the 200-m round trip distance through air.

When a laser pulse in a TOF-LRF system propagates through a dispersive medium, the pulse width is broadened because of the chromatic dispersion of the medium. The absolute values of the chromatic dispersion (|D|) can be derived from the refractive index of air as [19],

The theoretical result of the absolute value of the chromatic dispersion of the standard atmosphere is shown in Fig. 2(a). The chromatic dispersion of air with respect to the wavelength is changed in a range from -5.95 × 10-1 to -5.33 × 10-3 ps/km/nm. Since the chromatic dispersion depends on the wavelength, the amount of pulse width broadening should be calibrated by considering the operating wavelength of the TOF-LRF system. The amount of the pulse width broadening (Δτ) caused by the chromatic dispersion after the round trip of the pulse laser can be written as [19],

FIG. 2.(a) Absolute value of the chromatic dispersion (|D|) of the standard atmosphere and (b) variation of the amount of pulse width broadening (Δτ) caused by the chromatic dispersion depending on the input pulse width ( τ0) after the 200-m round trip to the target.

where Δλ is the spectral width of the pulse laser, which can be expressed by

where f0= c0/λ0 and Δf is the spectral width in the frequency domain. For an unchirped transform-limited Gaussian pulse laser with a time-bandwidth product of 0.44, the spectral width (Δf ) in the frequency domain can be written as [20],

where τ0 is the initial pulse width. By substituting Eqs. (10) and (11) into Eq. (9), we obtain the amount of the pulse width broadening (Δτ) as [19],

Figure 2(b) shows the variation of the amount of pulse width broadening of the pulse laser after the 200-m round trip to the target. The amount of pulse width broadening should be severely changed by the operating wavelength of the input light source because of the chromatic dispersion of the standard atmosphere. By considering Eq. (9), it is evident that the amount of the pulse width broadening (Δτ) is directly proportional to the absolute value of the chromatic dispersion of the standard atmosphere. As seen in Fig. 2(a), increasing the operating wavelength of the input light source gradually diminishes the absolute value of the chromatic dispersion of the standard atmosphere. The amount of the pulse width broadening (Δτ) should be substantially reduced by increasing the operating wavelength of the input light source as seen in Fig. 2(b).

The pulse width broadening strongly depends on the initial pulse width of the input light source. Since the spectral width of the pulse laser (Δλ) is reduced by increasing its initial pulse width (τ0), the amount of the pulse width broadening should be changed by the initial pulse width (τ0). For the case of the femtosecond laser, its spectral width is obviously much broader than that of the nanosecond or picosecond laser, the amount of the pulse width broadening for the femtosecond laser should be higher than those of other pulse lasers as seen in Fig. 2(b). The amount of pulse width broadening for various pulse lasers with different initial pulse width were shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.The amount of pulse width broadening for various pulse lasers with different initial pulse width after the 200-m round trip to the target at the operating wavelength of 1550 nm

The measurement accuracy of distance in the TOF-LRF system should be essentially affected by nonlinear refractive index depending on the optical intensity of the laser pulse [21]. The optical intensity of pulse laser required in the TOF-LRF strongly depends on a round trip distance [6, 22]. For the 200-m round trip distance, however, high power is not necessary to the pulse laser because of a relatively short distance of the round trip, and the effect of nonlinear refractive index of air on the measurement error of the round trip distance will be negligible.

A laser pulse at a certain wavelength is generally absorbed by various molecules in air. Particularly, the water vapor and the CO2 in air are strong factors for variation in the transmission of the laser pulse propagating in air [15]. The transmission of the standard atmosphere (Tw) with respect to the water vapor (Pw) can be written as [17],

where α(λ) is an absorption coefficient of the water vapor as a function of the wavelength. ww is a depth of precipitable water which is defined as the depth of water in a column of the atmosphere when if all the water vapor in the optical path is condensed into a layer of liquid water [23]. mw is the molecular weight of water, ρl is the mass density of liquid water, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature. pw is the partial pressure of the water vapor which is closely related to the relative humidity (h) [24]. By using different values of the absorption coefficient (α(λ)) depending on the operating wavelength of the pulse laser, the transmission of the standard atmosphere can be calculated [16]. Figure 3(a) shows the theoretical result of transmission of the standard atmosphere (Tw) with variations in the relative humidity for the 200-m round trip distance of femtosecond laser through air. The transmission of the standard atmosphere is changed by the relative humidity of air because of the water vapor absorption. From Eq. (14) to (16), it is evident that the transmission of the standard atmosphere depends on the partial pressure of the water vapor (pw), which is directly proportional to the relative humidity. Consequently, increasing the relative humidity gradually diminishes the transmission of the standard atmosphere as seen in Fig. 3(a). The transmission of the standard atmosphere corresponding to the relative humidity is also changed by the operating wavelength of the pulse laser because of the strong dependence of the absorption coefficient (α (λ)) of the water vapor on the operating wavelength. The different variation of the transmission in Fig. 3(a) is caused by the different values of the absorption coefficients corresponding to the operating wavelength [16]. The transmission variation of the standard atmosphere with respect to the water vapor at an operating wavelength of 1300 nm is relatively higher than those at other wavelengths because of the high absorption coefficient of water vapor at 1300 nm.

FIG. 3.Theoretical results for variation of the transmission of the standard atmosphere with respect to the relative humidity (a) and the concentration of CO2 (b).

For the concentration of CO2, the transmission of the standard atmosphere (Tc) can be written as [15],

where β(λ) and γ(λ) are the empirical parameters which are closely related to the line strength in the spectra line induced by molecular collisions based on CO2 [15]. Figure 3(b) shows the transmission variation of the standard atmosphere (Tc) with variations in the concentration of CO2. CO2 absorbs the optical power of the pulse laser resulting in the variation of the transmission of the standard atmosphere for the 200-m round trip distance of femtosecond laser through air. We considered two operating wavelengths with weak absorption bands of CO2, such as 1400 nm and 1600 nm [15]. By considering Eq. (17), it is readily understandable that the transmission of the standard atmosphere is reduced by increasing the concentration of CO2 as shown in Fig. 3(b). Since the absorption coefficients at 1400 nm is higher than those at 1600 nm, the transmission reduction at 1400 nm is higher than that at 1600 nm. By comparing the influence of water vapor and the concentration of CO2 on the transmission of the standard atmosphere, it can be seen that the absorption of water vapor is the more dominant factor in reducing the transmission.

 

III. CONCLUSION

We have analyzed the propagation characteristics of the pulse laser of TOF-LRF system with variations in atmospheric conditions, such as temperature, pressure, relative humidity, and the concentration of CO2. The refractive index variation of air induced by the temperature, pressure, relative humidity, and the concentration of CO2 results in a maximum distance measurement error of 6.42 mm, 12.01 mm, 56.86 μm and 48.98 μm, respectively, when the laser pulse propagates the 200-m round trip distance through air. Therefore, for the realization of the precise TOF-LRF system using the femtosecond laser, the measurement error of distance measurement error with variations in the atmospheric conditions should be corrected. We also have shown the dependence of the propagation characteristics of the pulse laser on the operating wavelength. Since the air is a dispersive medium, the pulse width should be broadened because of the chromatic dispersion of the standard atmosphere when a pulse laser propagates through the air. Considering the initial pulse width, the amount of pulse width broadening of femtosecond laser is higher than that of the nanosecond laser or picosecond laser. The absolute value of the chromatic dispersion of the standard atmosphere is diminished by increasing the operating wavelength of the pulse laser. Increasing the relative humidity gradually degrades the transmission of the standard atmosphere. The transmission of the standard atmosphere corresponding to the relative humidity is also changed by the operating wavelength of the pulse laser because of the strong dependence of the absorption coefficient (α(λ)) of the water vapor on the operating wavelength. The transmission of the standard atmosphere is also reduced gradually by increasing the concentration of CO2 because of the enhancement of optical absorption of CO2.

참고문헌

  1. M.-C. Amann, T. Bosch, M. Lescure, R. Myllyla, and M. Rioux, "Laser ranging: A critical review of usual techniques for distance measurement," Opt. Eng. 40, 10-19 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1330700
  2. M. Laurenzis, F. Christnacher, and D. Monnin, "Long-range three-dimensional active imaging with superresolution depth mapping," Opt. Lett. 32, 3146-3148 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.32.003146
  3. H. Ailisto, V. Heikkinen, R. Mitikka, R. Myllylȁ, J. Kostamovaara, A. Mantyniemi, and M. Koskinen, "Scannerless imaging pulsed-laser range finding," J. Opt. 4, S337-S346 (2002).
  4. A. Biernat and G. Kompa, "Powerful picosecond laser pulses enabling high-resolution pulsed laser radar," J. Opt. 29, 225-228 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0150-536X/29/3/023
  5. L. A. Vazquez-Zuniga and Y. Jeong, "Power-scalable, subnanosecond mode-locked erbium-doped fiber laser based on a frequency-shifted-feedback ring cavity incorporating a narrow bandpass filter," J. Opt. Soc. Korea 17, 117-181 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3807/JOSK.2013.17.2.117
  6. J. Lee, Y.-J. Kim, K. Lee, S. Lee, and S.-W. Kim, "Time-of-flight measurement with femtosecond light pulses," Nat. Photon. 4, 716-720 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.175
  7. S. H. Lee, J. H. Lee, Y. J. Kim, K. W. Lee, and S. W. Kim, "Active compensation of large dispersion of femtosecond pulses for precision laser ranging," Opt. Express 19, 4002- 4008 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.004002
  8. P. Jian, O. Pinel, C. Fabre, B. Lamine, and N. Treps, "Real-time displacement measurement immune from atmospheric parameters using optical frequency combs," Opt. Express 20, 27133-27146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.027133
  9. H.-S. Jeong, D. W. Kim, K. H. Kim, and J.-M. Lee, "All-optical signal-conversion efficiency with a parameterdependent four-wave-mixing process in a silicon nanowaveguide," J. Korean Phys. Soc. 62, 428-434 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.62.428
  10. D. H. Song, S. I. Hwang, and D.-K. Ko, "Dynamics of sub-microjoule femtosecond pulse formation in a negative dispersion regime," J. Korean Phys. Soc. 61, 730-734 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.730
  11. M. Hebert and E. Krotkov, "3D measurements from imaging laser radars: How good are they?," Img. Vision Comput. 10, 170-178 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-8856(92)90068-E
  12. B. Edlen, "The refractive index of air," Metrol. 2, 71-80 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/2/2/002
  13. P. E. Ciddor, "Refractive index of air: New equations for the visible and near infrared," Appl. Opt. 35, 1566-1573 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.001566
  14. J. N. Howard, D. E. Burch, and D. Williams, "Infrared transmission of synthetic atmospheres. I. Instrumentation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 186-190 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.46.000186
  15. J. N. Howard, D. E. Burch, and D. Williams, "Infrared transmission of synthetic atmospheres. II. Absorption by carbon dioxide," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 237-241 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.46.000237
  16. R. G. Eldridge, "Water vapor absorption of visible and near infrared radiation," Appl. Opt. 6, 709-713 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.6.000709
  17. H. Barrell and J. E. Sears, "The refraction and dispersion of air for the visible spectrum," Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 238, 1-64 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1939.0004
  18. K. P. Birch and M. J. Downs, "An updated Edlén equation for the refractive index of air," Metrologia 30, 155-162 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/30/3/004
  19. M. Tateda, N. Shibata, and S. Seikai, "Interferometric method for chromatic dispersion measurement in a single-mode optical fiber," IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 17, 404-407 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1981.1071115
  20. K. L. Sala, G. A. Kenney-Wallace, and G. E. Hall, "CW autocorrelation measurements of picosecond laser pulses," IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 16, 990-996 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1980.1070606
  21. W. E. Martin and R. J. Winfield, "Nonlinear effects on pulsed laser propagation in the atmosphere," Appl. Opt. 27, 567-577 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.27.000567
  22. Rairoux, H. Schillinger, S. Niedermeier, M. Rodriguez, F. Ronneberger, R. Sauerbrey, B. Stein, D. Waite, C. Wedekind, H. Wille, L. Woste, and C. Ziener, "Remote sensing of the atmosphere using ultrashort laser pulses," Appl. Phys. B 71, 573-580 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003400000375
  23. S. E. Tuller, "The relationship between precipitable water vapor and surface humidity in New Zealand," Arch. Met. Geoph. Biokl. 26, 197-212 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247163
  24. H. J. Liebe, "MPM-An atmospheric millimeter-wave propagation model," Int. J. Infrared Mill. Waves 10, 631-650 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01009565

피인용 문헌

  1. Improving the performance of time-domain pulsed echo laser profile using tunable lens vol.25, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.007970
  2. A method for calibrating coil constants by using an atomic spin co-magnetometer vol.70, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2016-70091-y