DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes of Ganglioside GM3 Expression in Porcine Oocyte Maturation and Early Embryonic Development In Vitro

  • Chae, Sung-Kyu (Dept. of Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Hyo-Jin (Dept. of Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Dept. of Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Ahn, Jae-Hyun (Dept. of Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Soo-Yong (Dept. of Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Jae-Young (Dept. of Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Yang, Seul-Gi (Dept. of Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Daegu University) ;
  • Koo, Deog-Bon (Dept. of Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Daegu University)
  • Received : 2015.12.01
  • Accepted : 2015.12.21
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Gangliosides exist in glycosphingolipid-enriched domains on the cell membrane and regulate various functions such as adhesion, differentiation, and receptor signaling. Ganglioside GM3 by ST3GAL5 enzyme provides an essential function in the biosynthesis of more complex ganglio-series gangliosides. However, the role of gangliosides GM3 in porcine oocytes during in vitro maturation and early embryo development stage has not yet understood clear. Therefore, we examined ganglioside GM3 expression patterns under apoptosis stress during maturation and preimplantation development of porcine oocytes and embryos. First, porcine oocytes cultured in the NCSU-23 medium for 44 h after $H_2O_2$ treated groups (0.01, 0.1, 1 mM). After completion of meiotic maturation, the proportion MII (44 h) was significantly different among control and the H2O2 treated groups ($76.8{\pm}0.3$ vs $69.1{\pm}0.4$; 0.01 mM, $55.7{\pm}1.0$; 0.1 mM, $38.2{\pm}1.6%$; 1 mM, P<0.05). The expressions of ST3GAL5 in $H_2O_2$ treated groups were gradually decreased compared with control group. Next, changes of ST3GAL5 expression patterns were detected by using immunofluorescene (IF) staining during preimplantation development until blastocyst. As a result, we confirmed that the expressions of ST3GAL5 in cleaving embryos were gradually decreased (P<0.05) according to the early embryo development progress. Based on these results, we suggest that the ganglioside GM3 was used to the marker as pro-apoptotic factor in porcine oocyte of maturation and early embryo production in vitro, respectively. Furthermore, our findings will be helpful for better understanding the basic mechanism of gangliosides GM3 regulating in oocyte maturation and early embryonic development of porcine in vitro.

Keywords

References

  1. Abeydeera LR and Day BN. 1997. Fertilization and subsequent development in vitro of pig oocyte sinse minated in a modified tris-buffered medium with frozen-thawede jaculated spermatozoa. Biology of Reproduction 57:729-734. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.4.729
  2. Agarwal A, Gupta S and Sharma RK. 2005. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology RB&E 3:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-28
  3. Brill A, Torchinsky A, Carp H and Toder V. 1999. The role of apoptosis in normal and abnormal embryonic development. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 16:512-519. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020541019347
  4. Choo YK. 1999. Distribution of ganglioside GM3 in the rat ovary after gonadotropin stimulation. Molecules and Cells 9:365-375.
  5. Choo YK, Chiba K, Tai T, Ogiso M and Hoshi M. 1995. Differential distribution of gangliosides in adult rat ovary during the oestrous cycle. Glycobiology 5:299-309. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/5.3.299
  6. Dalvit GC, Cetica PD, Pintos LN and Beconi MT. 2005. Reactive oxygen species in bovine embryo in vitro production. Biocell : Official Journal of the Sociedades Latinoamericanas de Microscopia Electronica 29:209-212.
  7. Day BN. 2000. Reproductive biotechnologies: Current status in porcine reproduction. Animal Reproduction Science 60-61:161-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00079-8
  8. Hwang SU, Jeon Y, Yoon JD, Cai L, Kim E, Yoo H, Kim KJ, Park KM, Jin M, Kim H and Hyun SH. 2015. Effect of ganglioside GT1b on the in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes and embryonic development. The Journal of Reproduction and Development. In press.
  9. Kolter T. 2012. Ganglioside Biochemistry. ISRN Biochemistry 2012, 506160.
  10. Kwak DH, Jung KY, Lee YC and Choo YK. 2003. Expressional changes of ganglioside GM3 during ovarian maturation and early embryonic development in db/db mice. Development, Growth & Differentiation 45:95-102. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-169X.2003.00678.x
  11. Kwak DH, Seo BB, Chang KT and Choo YK. 2011. Roles of gangliosides in mouse embryogenesis and embryonic stem cell differentiation. Experimental & Molecular Medicine 43:379-388. https://doi.org/10.3858/emm.2011.43.7.048
  12. Petters RM and Wells KD. 1993. Culture of pig embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement 48:61-73.
  13. Popova E, Bader M and Krivokharchenko A. 2011. Effect of culture conditions on viability of mouse and rat embryos developed in vitro. Genes. 2:332-344. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2020332
  14. Posse de Chaves E and Sipione S. 2010. Sphingolipids and gangliosides of the nervous system in membrane function and dysfunction. FEBS Letters 584:1748-1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.010
  15. Suzanne M and Steller H. 2013. Shaping organisms with apoptosis. Cell Death and Differentiation 20:669-675. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2013.11
  16. Vandaele L, Thys M, Bijttebier J, Van Langendonckt A, Donnay I, Maes D, Meyer E and Van Soom A. 2010. Shortterm exposure to hydrogen peroxide during oocyte maturation improves bovine embryo development. Reproduction 139:505-511. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0430
  17. Yoshikawa M, Go S, Suzuki S, Suzuki, A, Katori Y, Morlet T, Gottlieb SM, Fujiwara M, Iwasaki K, Strauss KA and Inokuchi J. 2015. Ganglioside GM3 is essential for the structural integrity and function of cochlear hair cells. Human Molecular Genetics 24:2796-2807. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddv041