Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on the CBI, senior technology entrepreneurship promotion - Based on Finland Bridge Program-

시니어 기술창업을 위한 CBI 추진방안 연구 - 핀란드 브릿지 프로그램 기반을 중심으로 -

  • 유순덕 (한세대학교 e-비즈니스학과) ;
  • 최광돈 (한세대학교 e-비즈니스학과)
  • Received : 2014.08.07
  • Accepted : 2015.01.20
  • Published : 2015.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper discusses entrepreneurship as a mean to overcome problems that arise from economic growth with no job growth and with aging population. In particular, this paper focuses on senior (elderly) entrepreneurship based on technology. It examines and defines restraints of various public and private sponsor programs for senior entrepreneurship. In comparison, Bridge Program of Finland was studied and its success factors are presented. Some of these success factors are enterprise-driven program operation, diverse education program focused on successful senior entrepreneurship, providing networking opportunities among entrepreneurs, and increased awareness in social responsibility of private enterprises. This paper suggests CBI (Corporate Business Incubator) in order to promote senior entrepreneurship. This study is expected to foster economic growth and job creation through utilizing increased elderly population in today's aging demographics. In addition, this study will be able to identify direction for government's role in boosting senior entrepreneurship.

본 연구는 고용 없는 성장과 고령화로 진입하는 국내경제 환경에 따라 이를 극복하기 위한 방안으로 시니어 기술창업을 위한 방안에 대해 고찰하였다. 정부와 기업이 운영하고 있는 시니어 창업지원의 한계점을 제시하고 한계점을 극복하기 위해 핀란드의 브릿지 프로그램의 성공요인을 파악하였다. 브릿지의 성공요인은 기업 주도형 시니어 창업지원 프로그램을 운영, 시니어들의 창업성공에 중심을 둔 다양한 교육 프로그램 제공, 창업기업과의 적절한 교류 기회 확대와 민간기업의 사회환원 마인드 확산이다 국내 시니어 기술창업 활성화를 위해 본 연구는 CBI(Corperate Business Incubator)를 통한 방안을 제언 하였다. 본 연구는 창업지원 정책의 발전방향을 파악하고 정부정책 및 산업 활성화 방안수립에 기여할 것이다. 향후 연구는 여러 국가 사례 비교를 통한 분석을 통해 기여점을 제시하는 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Changgoo An, Growth Fund Amendments ladder, Financial Services Commission, 2013.
  2. Hoon Back, Past government policies Comparative Study of the Promotion of Venture Businesses, KOSBI, 2012.
  3. Boram Geun, Crowd funding legislation, national and international status and trend analysis, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, 2013.
  4. Dohun Ha, Using data from the business strategy, SKT, 2014.
  5. Jaesun Han, Big data startup, KAIST, 2014.
  6. Hyun suck Jin, Mobile Business daunting challenge for new revenue models, Mobile loo, 2014.
  7. Dohyun Kang, Re-challenge support business venture plans, Ministry of Science, 2014.
  8. Yooshep Kang, Creative economy entrepreneurship ecosystem Korea, Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, 2013.
  9. Ryulee Kang, ICT trends in venture capital ecosystem, 2013.
  10. Youlee Kang, Current Status and Implications for U.S. Policy of entrepreneurship, 2012.
  11. Gaprea Kim, UK social investment market implications of development policies, Korea Capital Market Institute, 2013.
  12. Geun Kim, Gapsu Lee, Policy recommendations for technology start-ups, Samsung Economic Research Institute, 2004.
  13. Hanjoo Kim, Innovation support policies of Israel, 2012.
  14. Jeapil Kiml, The impact of the crisis on the Nokia Finland, DIGIECO, 2012.
  15. Jongwoon Kim, Support system for the promotion of Venture, Small and Medium Business Administration, 2013.
  16. Seoung keung Kim, Central challenge of youth culture, 2013.
  17. Youngjung Kim, Technology-based entrepreneurship Analysis of the impact and Revitalization of University, Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, 2014.
  18. Youngsoo Kim, Survey of Korea Venture Firms in 2013, 2013.
  19. Duck huan Lee, Entrepreneurship ecosystem, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, 2014.
  20. Gihoon Lee, Technology holding company operating manual presentation, Gangwon Technology Hodings, 2013.
  21. Jungsoo Lee, Start-up Analysis of Big Data, 2014.
  22. Sanggil Lee, Step-by-step for the activation of the venture ecosystem use and expected effects of tax incentives, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, 2014.
  23. Seonghuan Lee, The secret to enable innovative entrepreneurship, Samsung Economic Research Institute, 2013.
  24. Hyunsook Lee, Training of entrepreneurs through innovative entrepreneurship Revitalization, Science and Technology policy institute, 2013.
  25. Yoonjoon Lee, Status and Problems of entrepreneurship, Science and Technology policy institute, 2012.
  26. Gillim Park, Ecosystem changes and implications of entrepreneurship in Finland, Korea International Trade Association, 2013.
  27. Jeasung Park, Establishment of the American College Success Factors and Implications, Small and Medium Business Administration, 2013.
  28. Changsoo Seo, University Entrepreneurship Center Revitalization in the final report, Small and Medium Business Administration, 2012.
  29. Jongkook Song, Technology start-ups and venture ecosystem, Science and Technology policy institute, 2013.
  30. Outcomes and future policy challenges Venture draft measures, Joint Interagency, 2014.
  31. Creative direction and growth of the financial ladder Utilization of Funds data, 2014.
  32. Data store distribution Agency Services, 2014
  33. Start-up support activities at home and abroad, Korea Database Analysis, 2014.
  34. Using data from the business strategy, 2014
  35. Agenda for re-challenge measures, Joint Interagency, 2013.
  36. Presentation material growth fund ladder, KDB Asset Management, 2013.
  37. Venture capital plan ecosystem virtuous cycle, Joint Interagency, 2013.
  38. J. S Kim, D.H Hong, An analysis on the current status and management process of corporate venture capital, 2014