DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multilevel performance-based procedure applied to moderate seismic zones in Europe

  • Catalan, Ariel (Department of Construction, University of Oviedo, Campus of Gijon) ;
  • Foti, Dora (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Polytechnic of Bari)
  • Received : 2014.01.10
  • Accepted : 2014.07.26
  • Published : 2015.01.25

Abstract

The Performance-based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE) concept implies the definition of multiple target performance levels of damage which are expected to be achieved (or not exceeded), when the structure is subjected to earthquake ground motion of specified intensity. These levels are associates to different return period (RP) of earthquakes and structural behaviors quantified with adopted factors or indexes of control. In this work an 8-level PBEE study is carried out, finding different curves for control index or Engineering Demand Parameters (EDP) of levels that assess the structural behavior. The results and the curves for each index of control allow to deduce the structural behavior at an a priori unspecified RP. A general methodology is proposed that takes into account a possible optimization process in the PBEE field. Finally, an application to 8-level seismic performance assessment to structure in a Spanish seismic zone permits deducing that its behavior is deficient for high seismic levels (RP > 475 years). The application of the methodology to a low-to-moderate seismic zone case proves to be a good tool of structural seismic design, applying a more sophisticated although simple PBEE formulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrahamson, N.A. and Silva, W.J. (1997), "Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes", Seismol. Res. Lett., 68(1), 94-127. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.94
  2. Ambraseys, N.N., Douglas, J., Sigbjornsson, R., Berge-Thierry, C., Suhadolc, P., Costa, G. and Smit, P.M. (2004), Dissemination of European Strong-Motion Data, vol. 2, using Strong-Motion Datascape Navigator, CD ROM Collection, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom.
  3. Ambraseys, N.N., Simpson, K.A. and Bommer, J.J. (1996), "Prediction of Horizontal Response Spectra in Europe", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25, 371-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199604)25:4<371::AID-EQE550>3.0.CO;2-A
  4. ASCE 7-05. (2006), Minimum design loads for building and other structures. ASCE Standard. SEI. American Society of Civil Engineers. ASCE.
  5. Baker, J. and Cornell, C.A. (2005), "A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34, 1193-1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.474
  6. Benjamin, J.R., and Cornell C.A. (1970), Probability, Statistics and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, London.
  7. Bertero, R. and Bertero, V.V. (2002), "Performance-based seismic engineering: The need for reliable conceptual comprehensive approach", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 627-652. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.146
  8. Bommer, J. and Pinho, R. (2005), "Adapting earthquake actions in EC8 for performance-based seismic design", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 39-55.
  9. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.F. and Fumal, T.E. (1997), "Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from Western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work", Seismol. Res. Lett, 68, 128-153. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.128
  10. Bozorgnia, Y. and Bertero, V. (2004), Earthquake Engineering from Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering, CRC Press LLC. International Code Council (ICC), Boca Raton (USA),
  11. Campbell, K. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2007), NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters, Report No. PEER 2007/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
  12. Catalan, A., Benavent-Climent, A. and Cahis, X. (2010), "Selection and scaling of earthquake records in assessment of structures in low-to-moderate seismicity zones", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.09.003
  13. Diaferio M., Foti D., Sepe, V. (2007), "Dynamic identification of the tower of the provincial administration building", Proceeding of the Eleventh International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, Malta, 18-21 Sept. 2007, paper n. 2.
  14. Diaferio, M., Foti, D. and Giannoccaro, N.I. (2014), "Non-destructive monitoring of an old masonry clock tower with forced and environmental actions", Proceeding of the International Forum "Le Vie dei Mercanti", Editor La Scuola di Pitagora, in "Fabbrica della Conoscenza", 12-14 June 2014, ID 111.
  15. Diaferio M., Foti D. and Giannoccaro N.I. (2015), "Identification of the modal properties of a building of the Greek heritage", Key Eng Mater, 628,150-159. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.628.150.
  16. Douglas, J., Faccioli, E., Cotton, F. and Cauzzi, C. (2010), Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for GEM 1, Technical Report 2010-E1. GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy (www.globalquakemodel.org),
  17. EHE. (2008), Instruccion de Hormigon Estructural. Ministerio de Fomento. Madrid, Spain (in Spanish),
  18. Eurocode 8. EN 1998-1:2004. (2004), Design of structures for earthquake resistant. General rules, seismic actions, rules for buildings, Bruxelles, Belgium.
  19. Fardis, N.N. (2002), "Code developments in earthquake engineering", Proceeding of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Paper 845.
  20. FEMA 273. NEHRP. (1997), Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building, FEMA, Washington, DC.
  21. FEMA 356. (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA, Washington DC, SAC Joint Venture.
  22. FEMA 451B. NEHRP. (2007), Recommended Provisions for New Building and Other Structures: Training and Instructional Materials, FEMA, Washington, DC.
  23. Foti, D., Diaferio, M., Mongelli, M., Giannoccaro, I.N. and Andersen, P. (2011), "Operational modal analysis of a historical tower in bari, Civil engineering topics, Volume 4", ISBN 978-1-4419-9315-1, Conference Proceeding of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, "IMAC XXIX", 2011, Volume 7, pp. 335-342, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  24. Foti, D., Diaferio, M., Giannoccaro, I.N. and Mongelli, M. (2012a), "Dynamic testing and model updating of a historic concrete tower", NDT and E Int., 47, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.11.009
  25. Foti, D., Ivorra S., Bru, D. and Di Maggio, G. (2012b), "Dynamic Identification of a Pedestrian Bridge using OMA: Previous and Post-Reinforcing, In: B.H.V. Topping, (Editor)", Proceeding of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Dubrovnik, 4-7 sept. 2012, STIRLINGSHIRE:Civil-Comp Press, ISBN: 978-1-905088-54-6.
  26. Foti, D., Ivorra-Chorro, S. and Sabba, M.F. (2012c), "Dynamic investigation of an ancient masonry bell tower with operational modal analysis", Open Constr. Build. Tech. J., 6, 384-391. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801206010384
  27. Foti, D. (2013), "Dynamic identification techniques to numerically detect the structural damage", Open Constr. Build.Tech. J., 7, 43-50. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801307010043
  28. Foti, D., Gattulli, V. and Potenza, F. (2014), "Output-only identification and model updating by dynamic testing in unfavorable conditions of a seismically damaged building", Computer-Aided Civil Infrastructure Eng., 29(9), 659-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12071
  29. Foti, D. (2014), "dentification of the Modal Properties of a Medieval Tower Next to a Landslide, Proc International Forum "Le Vie dei Mercanti", Editor La Scuola di Pitagora, in "Fabbrica della Conoscenza", 12-14 June 2014, ID 184.
  30. Foti, D. (2015a), "Non-destructive techniques and monitoring for the evolutive damage detection of an ancient masonry structure", Key. Eng. Mater., 628, 168-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.052
  31. Foti, D. (2015b), "A new experimental approach to the pushover analysis of masonry buildings", Comput. Struct., 147.
  32. Gasparini, G., Silvestri, S. and Trombetti, T. (2011), "A new procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering", Proceeding of the 11th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, August 1-4, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
  33. Giovenale, P., Cornell, C.A. and Esteva, L. (2004), "Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motions intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 951-979. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.386
  34. Iervolino, I. and Cornell, C.A. (2005), "Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures", Earthq. Spectra, 21(3), 685-713. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1990199
  35. Lepidi, M., Gattulli, V. and Foti, D. (2009), "Swinging-bell resonances and their cancellation identified by dynamical testing in a modern bell tower", Eng. Struct., 31, 1486-1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.014
  36. NCSE-02. (2002), Norma de Construccion Sismorresistente, Parte General y Edificacion, Ministerio de Fomento. BOE N 244. Madrid, Spain (in Spanish),
  37. Palermo, M., Ricci, I., Gagliardi, S., Silvestri, S., Trombetti, T. and Gasparini, G. (2014), "Multi-Performance seismic design through an enhanced first-storey isolation system", Eng. Struct., 59, 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.002
  38. Palermo, M., Silvestri, S., Gasparini, G. and Trombetti, T. (2014), "Crescent shaped braces for the seismic design of building structures", Mater. Struct., published online February 2014: doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0249-z.
  39. Park, Y.J. and Ang, A.H.S. (1985), "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete", J. Struct Eng., 111(4), 722-739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  40. Park, Y.J., Ang, M. and Wen, Y.K. (1987), "Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings", Earthq Spectra, 3(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585416
  41. Qiang, X., Chia-Wei, W., Cheng-Chung, C. and Kuo-Ching, C. (2008), "The draft code for performance-based seismic design of buildings in Taiwan", Eng. Struct., 30, 1535-1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.002
  42. Reinhorn, A.M., Kunnath, C.K., Valles, R.E., Li, C. and Madan, A. (2006), Idarc 2D Version 6.1, A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Buildings, SUNY, Buffalo; NY.
  43. Shome, N. and Cornell, C.A. (2000), "Structural seismic demand analysis: consideration of "Collapse", Proceeding of the 8th ACSE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanic and Structural Reliability, Notre Dame, Indiana.
  44. Shome, N. and Cornell, C.A. (1999), Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures, RMS Report-35, Reliability of Marine Structures Group, Stanford University, Stanford CA.
  45. Silvestri, S., Trombetti, T. and Gasparini, G. (2009), "A procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis which allows to account for poisson or non-poissonian models", Proceeding of 10th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR 2009), Osaka, Japan, Paper 0470.
  46. Trombetti, T., Silvestri, S., Malavolta, D. and Gasparini G. (2007), "Identification of representative and efficient groups of design earthquake inputs", Proceeding of the 4th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, ISEC-4-Innovations in Structural Engineering and Construction. Melbourne, 977-983.
  47. Trombetti, T., Silvestri, S. and Gasparini, G. (2008), "The role of epsilon for the identification of groups of earthquake inputs of given hazard, Paper 07-0088", Proceeding of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE), Beijing, China, 12-17 October.

Cited by

  1. Seismic response analysis of isolated offshore bridge with friction sliding bearings vol.16, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.641